The Queen's Speech and the digital economy

Start-ups will cheer, but our copyright system remains a mess.

The Queen and Prince Philip.
The Queen and Prince Philip at the state opening of Parliament. Photograph: Getty Images

As soon as the Queen began to list her government’s priorities on Wednesday it came as no surprise to hear that the Government’s top priority in the next parliamentary session is going to be delivering economic growth. When the Government comes to look at which industries that growth will come from, they will undoubtedly turn to the growing potential of digital businesses and the Internet.

The UK economy has the most Internet-dependent economy of all the industrialised nations. A study by the Boston Consulting Group found that the Internet is currently worth £120bn to the UK Economy, or 8 per cent of GDP, and is forecasted to rise to 12 per cent by 2016. The only other nation coming close to this high a percentage was South Korea with 7.3 per cent. We are world leaders in digital start-ups and SMEs across the UK are the job creators and wealth creators of the future.

The Government signalled in the Queen’s Speech its plans to introduce some really helpful measures for digital businesses. The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill being introduced to Parliament holds some real potential. We understand the Government intends this to be a wide ranging bill and will include key issues such as employment regulation, which is a huge concern for a small business needing to scale up rapidly. This will definitely be one to watch as there is a great opportunity for the Government to provide real benefits to startups and SMEs. Business owners face heavy administrative burdens and significant risks if they get it wrong, so allowing entrepreneurs to do what they do best and grow their businesses more easily will help push forward the growth the UK desperately needs.

Also included was a reference to the much-trailed Draft Communications Data Bill. This refers to plans to allow intelligence agencies to collect data on communications, including across the Internet, also known as Communications Capabilities Development Programme (CCDP). The bill is likely to come up against significant opposition, and not just from free speech advocates. We are yet to see the details of the plans but there will be key questions over who the financial burden of data retention will fall upon, and whether Government intends to break SSL, the system used for secure communications which underpins businesses and e-commerce sites.

However, absent from the speech was any reference to reforming Britain’s outdated copyright law. The purpose of intellectual property protection is to foster innovation, but many aspects of the current copyright regime are having the opposite effect for digital businesses. Innovative entrepreneurs are creating brilliant new models for distributing creative content, yet they have to spend too long navigating complicated licensing schemes rather than developing and growing their business.

Implementing recommendations from the Hargreaves Review, commissioned by the Prime Minister in 2010 and accepted by Government last year, will allow today’s technology start-ups to compete with their European and US rivals.

The Queen’s speech is designed to set the parliamentary agenda, but Government and Parliament are still free to respond legislatively to issues as they arise. We hope they will realise there has never a better time to reform copyright law than now. The recommendations are raring and ready to go and they will allow Britain’s vibrant digital businesses to be able to harness the web’s potential to contribute to deliver the vital economic growth the UK economy needs.

3 comments

mzaryta's picture

anim3snipe
sadt3ars
animeonlye
nsf7
3solat
mnoms
magicians4all
animexyt
mexyt
delegnet

Mrs.Josephine Hyde-Hartley's picture

"there will be key questions over who the financial burden of data retention will fall upon"
Does this mean there may be questions about who owns data control? Like whether data control can be bought or sold? Data control is a very confused topic at the moment, I find.

The best data control is designed to affect one's real authenticity, autonomy and integrity as an individual person in the most favourable and beneficial way, I think. So data control is a personal thing I think. It's not about protecting workers and fostering an "us and them " mentality. We're well placed here in the UK to personalise data control appropriately for the occasion, I think - thanks to our largely unwritten, generous and therefore flexible UK constitution.

For example Neelie Kroes, vice-president of the European Commission said earlier this week, with regard to making digital data control work both ways in health care services;

"Central to taking this leap forward is the need to put patients in control of their personal data – while also using anonymised data to deliver life-saving innovation"

Paulie's picture

There's rather more evidence against the assertion that 'outdated' copyright laws are stalling the UK digital economy than there is for it, as this article illustrates.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/03/28/shoreditch_meh/

On the other hand, the UK has a huge comparative advantage in the creative industries and the unions that work in them are unanimous in calling for the speedy implementation of the Digital Economy Act that I know that Sara Kelly opposes.

By the way, has the New Statesman started using employees of commercial pressure groups as journalists now? Tax-dodging US corporations have a huge amount to gain from Coadec's lobbying on their behalf - and the UK's creative sector has a lot to lose. Sara Kelly should be declaring interests when she writes here, surely? I hope that NS is at least getting paid for carrying advertorial?

Latest tweets