The Olympic opening ceremony shows why lefties should embrace pageantry
The NHS, the Windrush - this was a Britain to make us proud.
By Steven Baxter Published 28 July 2012 17:37
Elizabeth II, long to parachute over us, plummeting from a helicopter with James Bond, is what will live longest in the memory, perhaps. (It certainly gives a new meaning to 'I'll treat you like a Queen.')
But what we should take away from Danny Boyle's stellar Olympic opening ceremony is how even the fun-hating wet blankets of the laughless Left - you know, us - can find something to enjoy in a bit of pageantry, celebration and (gasp) patriotism. If it's done well.
If you put the right totems in front of the right people, they press the right buttons. I felt my liberal buttons being pressed a lot by Boyle: I knew I was being exploited, manipulated and whatever, but by jingo I enjoyed the thrill.
It wasn't just the excitement of seeing my own favourite things about Britain - the NHS, multiculturalism, and so on - brought to the hillocky altar that floated my leftleaning boat. It was also the slightly more childish delight of knowing - and being able to see, through seething tweets - just how much it was going to irk my political foes.
I could imagine them fuming and wincing at scenes such as when the Windrush arrived. Some, Tory MP Aidan Burley for instance, were less able to think before they tweeted their reaction to what they were seeing. Others were more capable of biting their tongues, perhaps.
There were other bits I was less keen on - the bowing and scraping to royalty, for example; the Seb Coe speech hinting at a future political rehabilitation for William Hague's former judo sparring partner, in particular.
We've all got favourites. Wasn't it terrific, though, to see something like the NHS so publicly celebrated, at a time when it's under so much threat? (No, you're entitled to grumble in the comments, no, it was awful, the NHS is awful and it should all be privatised tomorrow morning. One person's joy is another's sorrow.)
Some lefties are uncomfortable about being patriotic, for a huge range of reasons. What's worth noticing in a huge sporting event like the Olympics or a World Cup is the pride and passion of the participants. It's not xenophobic, scary nationalism but a more benign celebration of what we have in common, despite our differences.
Not just that, though, but it's worth remembering how much people from across a range of backgrounds can be brought together in a sense of shared endeavour and collective participation.
There's nothing wrong with that and in a lot of ways it's exactly what we've always been about: those of us old enough to remember trade unions have a faint recollection of banner-waving, galas and marches. There was a time when we weren't so coy about getting together and enjoying ourselves, rather than sneering from the sidelines.
So. Let us take the lead from our gracious Queen, and take the plunge from that helicopter. Let's not be afraid of pomp and pageantry; let's just dive in.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists





















32 comments
Pageantry is all very well and good when it's not costing two fortunes that the public purse can ill afford. I'd have much rather seen the money spent on organising the dancing nurses redirected to putting actual nurses on the wards...
And all this expenditure, for what? To celebrate a super-annuated sports day, a gross celebration of those whose lives have been so focussed on running a bit fast, jumping, or throwing things that they absolutely require a bauble to validate their own existence. This is not to be celebrated: it is pitiable. The saddest element of the whole sorry nonsense, however, was seeing normally sensible members of the press get caught up in the whole nonsense - particularly those who fooled themselves into thinking the current government will even Boyle's little flag waving for the NHS, let alone permit it to trouble them with even a second thought as they gleefully set about dismantling it.
On the plus side, though, the whole sorry farce is now over and will never return during my lifetime. As a bonus, it is to be hoped that FIFA also took note of events such as the farcial situation over security contractors to perform as per contractual obligations, the large piles of appalling, unsold tat featuring those hideous logos and mascots, the half-empty stadiums, and thus we Londoners will not have to suffer hosting a World Cup any time soon, which would assuredly be even worse.
Will we ever hear the end of Doreen Laurence? She really has turned her son's murder into a long term career. Why didn't they have any of the relatives of all the elderly white people who have died after being mugged by members of the Afro-Carribean community? Or we could have had some relatives of the 7/7 bombing victims telling us how much they appreciate immigration and cultural enrichment.
Although the Opening Ceremony was described as three hours long, with the Parade of Nations occupying a significant portion, there was probably less than an hour to work with to provide a potted history of the UK. The "Green and Pleasant Land" segment apparently took place before the official start, so the rest was divided into "Pandemonium" (which I felt lasted a little too long and slightly confused timeline wise, with Brunel's chimneys being 'built' at the same time as the Suffragettes, Windrush and the forging of the rings), the NHS / children's literature bit, the Abide With Me bit (which the commentators said was related to 7/7, but the stadium voiceover said was dedicated to relatives of those in the stadium who "couldn't be with us" so probably covering all forms of death), the pop music / technology bit and "Happy and Glorious" (sorry Daniel and Liz, but for me the Corgis were better actors than either of you two - and they didn't have to learn any lines!)
I suppose in presenting a positive image of the country, the industrial segment had to stop at that point, after all particularly in the 1980s and 1990s the factories and chimneys were largely torn down to make way for retail sheds, with the remaining mills either abandoned or converted into trendy apartments. As for the pop music bit, much of what I remembered from the 1990s was absent - apparently there was a Blur track, but no Oasis, Pulp or (heaven forbid) Spice? Then again, I suppose pop (in the eyes of many) has gone downhill recently - we don't seem to have much in the way of original acts that write their own stuff, let alone bands that include musicians (rather than a bunch of talent[less] contest winners or those who auditioned for the part, singing either covers or stuff written by songwriting companies hired by the record label)...
I suppose for any director, working out which key (positive!) achievements of Britain can not only be celebrated in under an hour, but incorporated into a multimedia song-and-dance spectacular, would be tricky - especially as we have a habit of being self-deprecatory (and not without good reason, given all the subjugation of various peoples - including those in far-flung bits of our own country! - we've done in the past). I suppose at the least they could have had a nod to Charles Dickens as well as Will Shakespeare (who of course comes from the *other* Stratford), and got the Welsh children to sing Land of My Fathers (which is the Welsh National Anthem, rather than a hymn which happened to be written by a Welshman: Danny Boy, while written by an Englishman to an Irish tune, was noted at the time to have been sung widely by "Sinn Feiners and Ulstermen alike", so I suppose was an appropriate tune for that region, while Flower of Scotland is one of the main candidates for unofficial Scottish National Anthem).
Still, despite my misgivings (including the half hour of cuts - which presumably included the battle of the music genres in the mosh pits, the Doctor Who theme [which was alluded to by the TARDIS materialisation sound effect during Bohemian Rhapsody] and The Liberty Bell), I enjoyed it overall.
Actually, with our sense of self-deprecation, perhaps they should grab Eric Idle for the closing ceremony to lead everyone in a rendition of ALOTBSOL :D
Our long suffering pop stars, MCcartney should have played "Get Back" go home Pakistanis instead of "Hey Jude".
Israeli athletes killed by muslims at an Olympic venue, each athlete is worth a billion "Stephen Lawrences", surely our spineless third reich, opium for the masses should have said. .
Yes art reflects society. Someone else pays for your sex life and the support for a never ending streaming of welfare babies!!!!!They never included the riots???
I like the way we, as a country, no longer care about any other news that doesn't in any way shape or form involve the Olympics. I heard a few seconds worth of announcements about Syria, but then it was straight back to The Games.
This must have been what it was like to live in a self contained (utterly self obsessed) tribe.
On the plus side, a terrorist attack anywhere other than at the games would be an utter waste of time (more so), as no one in this country would hear anything about it.
It was basically a very good show for the home audience and people of the former British Empire, and those of us foreigners who know omething about things British. While this adds up to a very large portion of the global audience, there were still millions upon millions of people out there for whom much of the content was totally irrelevant or incomprehensible. Does it matter? Not really, but it might be a good idea to remember that while the known world is British to a lot of people, Britain isn't the whole world.
Lefties don't do pageantry lefties just moan, whinge and complain, having fun is not in their nature..
One Indian online commenter said it was a showcase of out TV programmes and wondered aloud if this was all British culture amounted to now. It kind of is isn't it. It's not the fall of the empire that is responsible for that I feel, I thinkit's been the accompanying masochism.
Shouldn't the genuine left decry such extravagance, saying that the money should have gone to help the poor? I'm not lefty but I think that.
The poor can watch from the gutters of the world and get the same sense of escapism that we get. Then they go back to being poor.
Since pop music was hot topic on the night, let me tell you what's going on - this industry has been all but taken over by a group of evil men who first of all entice young artists to join "the club". They then make the young up-and-coming singers/performers, literally sign their contracts in their own blood in order to become rich and famous. A number of them have said they've "sold their souls to the devil", and in fact are seen making the devil sign, ie. holding the first and little finger up as horns.
Once they've been initiated, they are then used as puppets to corrupt people's and children's minds either subliminally or in plain sight. Another gesture is to shape their fingers in a triangle (pyramid) shape, which is an Illuminati sign. Another much used gesture is to cover one eye, or point to one eye, or make a V shape with the fingers around one eye, which symbolises the all-seeing eye of Horus. If you don't know the meaning, do a little research and look it up. You can see all this on the dollar, and who prints the dollar? The Federal Reserve, and this will give you an idea who's behind it.
The artists become under total mind control. The plan is to corrupt society, especially our youth. A materially-minded society is easier to get at, to get control of. We all know the storm that raged over the sexualising of children's clothes, how little girls want to look like their favourite singers, like Rihanna and Willow Smith. Well, we're also being mind-controlled by the media, led by the nose to accept it. The music and movie industries are all part of the plan to indoctrinate us to accepting the New World Order.
If you look at past footage, you can also see ex-presidents GEORGE W BUSH and HIS WIFE make the devil sign, ALSO BILL CLINTON. Hillary Clinton has been photographed holding her middle finger up in a "F*ck you" gesture. You might think, "Oh, this is America!" but you may also remember Tony Blair and Gordon Brown talk of the New World Order, and Tony Blair has also been photographed making the devil sign. In other words, these people have come under the sway of the big bank owners, which include the Rothschilds and Rockefellers and also the Vatican. YES, that paeon of rightousness and supposed speaking-for-God evil crew.
Some artists sport a little butterfly tattoo somewhere on their body. This represents the Monarch butterfly which Nazi scientists discovered this butterfly has homing device. They call it Monarch programming, and we've come to see a lot of celebrities break under the strain of it all, like Britney Spears, Eminem, Bob Dylan, Marilyn Monroe... oh yes, this goes back a long way, well before the 60's.
Those who go under and start taking sleeping pills to escape, are quickly whisked away for re-programming, and they can either accept their fate and carry on, or die. Those who rebelled totally and tried to warn the public, were found dead soon after often in mysterious circumstances, but easily blamed on a drug or alcohol related lifestyle. If you recall, Michael Jackson did try to tell us without mentioning the actual name, called it "The Industry". DMX was imprisoned on a trumped up charge for speaking out against "The Industry" and afterwards assigned to a mental institution. Look what happened to Amy Winehouse and Witney Houston. This begs the question as to how much the judicial system has been contaminated in USA and here, by these evil bankers.
They go by different names, but they like to remain hidden in a cloud of secrecy and have done for many years. Names such as the Industry, the Illuminati, the Elite, the Higher-Ups, the Big Bankers. Their aim is to drastically reduce the world's population by mass elimination through a programme of vaccinations and wars, if they can bring them about. They try to engineer fear by creating "terrorist" activity and stir up hate, so going to war is acceptable. This Syrian rebellion has been "got up" in order to create a war involving more countries. JFK tried to warn us about the secret societies before he was assassinated:
"The very word 'secrecy' is repugnant, in a free and open society. And we are as a people, inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings".
Well, it's too late, because these people are masters of deception and we have been oblivious to the evil. They have infiltrated and control all the major industries, so our fight will have to be, to stick together as a people. We don't know to what extent the present government has been infiltrated, but the way it's looking, it's us against them. We are millions, they are hundreds. We can defeat them but only if we stay strong for what we know to be right. Don't forget they are trying to reduce our numbers by stealth. Do not accept any inoculations or let your children be "vaccinated". The big pharmas cannot be trusted. They own the big pharmas. It's a war for survival, and we have God on our side. Goodness will win in the end, but many people will die defending it. Just make sure you're well prepared. Do your research - start with INFO.WARS .COM
Nothing like a big event like the Olympics to create excitement among the conspiracy theorists (who probably wish the recent discovery of a new Mayan calendar which extends beyond December hadn't been made - but still, the triangular shape of the stadium floodlights in particular had them leaping to conclusions and spouting buzzwords like "illuminati" and "New World Order" [hmm... I wonder if they've enough buzzwords to compile a game of Buzzword Bingo?]) - and judging by the results when searching for Olympics-related videos or the recommended videos after you've watched one, they've also been busy with their video editing software...
Compared to you sanity is boring. All hail your madness.
That's one of the worst strings of nothing I've ever skimmed through, my friend.
Bill Clinton was photographed with his middle finger up? - Which proves your point?
Amy Winehouse died? Which proves your point?
You don't need to have an evil conspiracy you big nut. It's enough that the music industry aims to seduce our youth to make money and push their mind towards sex and consumerism...
Overall a fantastic ceremony.
However it was predictable in it's portrayal of British history. An example being the number of non-white performers up to the 1950s. For this display to be historically accurate there should have been an overwhelming white presence up to the arrival of the Windrush feature.
The presence of the libertarian extremist Shami Chakrabarti also indicated a liberal/left wing bias in this performance.
In this sense it was lefty/multicultural crap!!!
You do realise do you that the descendants of the mill workers and steel workers who marched from Jarrow are the people who went on to march against mass immigration and multiculturalism, while Leftie multiculturalists sneered at them from afar? And who now sit in long-term unemployment and discarded cultures thanks to Labour unable to compete with millions prepared to dispense with workers' rights.
Trying to portray yourselves as the inheritors of their legacy adds insult to injury. Does hypocrisy come any bigger than that?
Enthusiastic crowds "celebrating our diversity" while being instructed by "their betters" (natch)and "coming together" sounds both sinister and pathetically pedantic. One of the many reasons mass events are too much money and trouble and why many people simply tune out those who want them to "come together and celebrate" while having the latest version of a clergyman/teacher/"activist" wave his finger in their faces.
The Olympics were a harmless affectation in the 1890s; they're now a monstrosity, just like the World Cup or a US presidential election.
You are right. It was fabulous seeing the things I care about being celebrated and that hasn't happened for a long long time from Left, Right and/or Centre. We have been beaten into submission by scandals from MPs, bankers, the Press and anyone else we laid our trust in.
This is OUR country and we should keep fighting to keep it a fair and just country. I thank Danny Boyle for reminding me.
This didn't feel like Danny Boyle's vision, but Nu Labour's vision calling out from beyond the grave. After all it was under their tenure that the brief was given and the show compiled. It was clear that the Conservatives had reviewed it and tried to shoehorn in a bit of traditional stuff, which sat incongruously with the rest ( Chelsea pensioners, classical filler music, and I shouldn't be surprised if they weren't responsible for the James Bond and Mr Bean stuff). But the rest was a homage to everything Nu Labour held dear, the glorying of 60s pop stars seemed a throwback to the Cool Britannia days and were old fashioned in more ways than one.
The supposedly edgy political points about exploitation of the poor and of the NHS were a showcase of what wealthy metropolitan labourites hope are the priorities of the working classes.
Lefties and multiculturalists have nothing to feel self-congratulatory about, they sold the efforts of the Jarrow marchers and Suffragettes down the river, and they turned us into a weak, PR-driven nightmare, and were apologists for cultural sexism and mosogynist violence. Don't dare try to lay claim to the blood and sweat of our forebearers.
What last nights performance aptly demonstrated to many, including those commenting from abroad was that as time wore on we became steadily more shallow and confused and now have nothing to celebrate except portraying ourselves as clowns.
Regarding representation of the part ethnic minorities have played in Britain in thladder 50 years, itwasn't the Windrush's arrival that annoys your political foes, it's the fact that the typical English family is presented as mixed race, and the third act representing the future included one white person and three black ones. And the Olympic flag had no white Britons carrying it, but two minority ones. It's not as if this happened by accident, that was by totally conscious design.
Given the two previous acts in the show which showcased only a tiny selection of what Britain gave the world pre-Windrush (no Newton, Darwin, Parliamentary system, Enlightenment, canon of great authors), it feel like an arrogant and depressing slap in the face. The message I got last night was: you're part of the past and the future is vacuous, yay!
Yes that pisses people off.
Yes, wasn't it awfully left-wing and simplistic? Still, maybe a suitable Murdoch-Mail version of the ceremony can be devised, combining extended readings from the King James Version by Michael Gove while troops re-enact the storming of Goose Green to a chorus of 'Land of Hope and Glory' sung by an all-white chorus of investment bankers and Russian mafiosi.
I prefer the term "anti-racist humanitarian" to "leftie" and as such a person I too was impressed with the attempt at a social history of England in the 2012 London Olympic Games Opening Ceremony (Serra-moan-ee in Americanized, US lackey Australia) - however I was angered by the gross lying by omission.
It was greatly inferior to Beijing in terms of Art and Spectacle but it did provide some English social history including the Enclosures, the Industrial Revolution, England as factory of the world, World War 1, the post-WW2 Welfare State and the NHS. However in doing this it followed a long tradition of dishonest English historiography involving massive lying by omission (what British-Sierra Leonian heritage Aminatta Forna called "the secret lie" in her recent novel "The Memory of Love" (Google "Review "The Memory of Love" War, trauma & lying").
Some of the Elephant in the Room historical realities involving London-based genocidal violence that were utterly ignored by the Opening Ceremony:
1. The Scottish Clearances in which Highland Scots (including my forebears) were replaced by sheep and driven from their lands by deprivation and starvation (a Scots choir sang in English).
2. The ethnocide of Wales (a Welsh choir sang in English).
3. The Irish Famine in which 1 million perished and 1-2 million were forced to emigrate (a Northern Irish choir sang "Danny Boy", in English).
4. Over 2 centuries of an Indian Holocaust in which 1.8 billion Indians died avoidably from imposed deprivation, 10 million were butchered in reprisals in the decade after the 1857 Rebellion, massive famines from the 1769-1770 Bengal Famine (10 million killed) to the WW2 Bengali Holocaust (6-7 million Indians deliberately starved to death with Australian complicity; Google “Australian ABC Censors Australia- And UK-Complicit WW2 Bengali Famine (6-7 Million Dead)” ).
5. Anglo-imposed imperial genocide on all inhabited continents (continuing this century today in Palestine, Somalia, Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan), slavery, imperial theft, indentured labor, opium to China etc that enabled Victorian "civilization" and industrialization (see my book "Jane Austen and the Black Hole of British History" now available for free perusal on the Web ).
6. 1950-2005 avoidable deaths from deprivation in countries variously occupied by the UK in the post-war era totalled 727 million (see my book "Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950" now available for free perusal on the Web).
7. 1,000 years of bloody Celtic conflict with England was dismissed as rugby union "game" in the TV version fed to Australia - with the English finally winning with the final drop goal by Jonny Wilkinson to defeat an Australia borne of English and Celtic refugees and convicts.
Some of the real truth did emerge e.g. the dominant role of "men in top hats" who still run the show (formerly the gentry, aristocrats, nabobs and industrialist freemasonry, now Pacmen or Prosperous Anglo-Celtic Men); Her Majesty greeting Mr Bond (007 with a licence to kill, such licence having been exercised in Iraq, Afghanistan , Libya in recent years) and now evidently in Syria); and the statue of Winston Churchill conducting proceedings (there is no mention in his Nobel Prize-winning, 6-volume “The Second World War” any mention of the 6-7 million Indians he deliberately starved to death in the 1942-1945 Bengali Holocaust).
And what the Ceremony ignored was the glory of multicultural London and the brilliant British science behind the continuing Industrial Revolution (notably chemistry and physics) and the NHS (notably biochemistry, pharmaceuticals , immunology) - instead we had "pop". History ignored yields history repeated.
Yeah and what about when I stubbed my toe on the pavement
why should the British feel proud? what has that nonsense got to do with the Olympics? I didn't see the ceremony, but it sounds absolutely ridiculous, and, it follows, typically British. what has the NHS got to do with the world gathering of athletes? after all, it's no great shakes, the NHS... In the last evaluation of health care by WHO the UK's NHS was in 12th place. France was first, Italy third.... the US, about 23rd as I recall. Patriotism? patriotism is love of country. That's all. Love of the place of birth of oneself and one's fathers. I am a patriot. i love England, and Europe, both being the place of my birth and my fathers. And hate the Coca Cola, Macdonald's Olympic Games (London) 2012. Vive Jose Bove.
After its starring role in projecting Britain to the world, the National Health Service is probably now more or less safe from the Coalition's neo-Blairism, although only the first Labour Government since 1979 will secure it firmly.
In fact, from the celebration of agriculture and manufacturing, to that of the NHS, to Shami Chakrabati, the whole thing amounted to a splendid repudiation of Blairism, and thus of Blair himself.
Last night, his scheme for a return as Prime Minister at the head of New Labour-Cameroon-Orange Book technocracy was gloriously torn to shreds and burned, as if in the cauldron, before the eyes of the whole wide world.
Right, I could never be accused of being a leftie and there are certainly parts of the whole thing I found a bit boring but I enjoyed it. I enjoyed the spectacle, the enthusiasm and the imagery, the rings being a particular highlight for me. I enjoyed that the people organising the show had a sense of humour and went to bed thinking what a good show.
Then I woke up to this drivel. Right and left wing idiots, as per usual, making it all about them. And if the fact that part of what you enjoyed is that you think other people would have hated it, well, that says a heck of a lot about you.
Personally I hope that everyone found something in it to enjoy.
From Andrew Murray the Spectator: couldn't have put it better meself.
Until last night I thought Danny Boyle was the respected director of a film about smack-heads. But after seeing the Olympics opening ceremony I now realize ‘Danny Boyle’ is the nom de guerre of the satirical team of Rod Liddle and James Delingpole.
In their capable hands what might have been merely an opportunity to showcase Britain became instead a hilarious example of our national humour. This included pretending that our national life only really began with the Empire Windrush, that our national religion is the NHS and that our leading icons include – and I never thought the boys would get away this this one – Shami Chakrabarti. It was so funny I almost wept at times. But then I reflected on their choice of music and became solemn.
Because of Delingpole’s deeply proletarian tastes, this element was far too limited. I am willing to tolerate jokes about us being a nation of idiotic lefties who spend our days bouncing on NHS beds, but the organisers should have shown that our nation’s musical heritage started before the 1960s.
My hopes were raised when Sir Simon Rattle emerged. But he was only there for an extended joke with Mr Bean – the classical masterpiece he was permitted to conduct being the theme from Chariots of Fire. Otherwise it was all the Clash and the Sex Pistols with extended episodes given to Dizzee Rascal, the Arctic Monkeys and Sir Paul McCartney struggling to sing a song he has bored us with for forty years.
So in the end I regretted the choice of directors. My main fear is that a young person from elsewhere in the world – better educated, but possibly lacking our sense of humour – might take it all literally. They may have learned of a Britain which was a serious country and produced many of the world’s greatest writers, leaders, thinkers and artists. After watching last night’s ceremony they will realise that Britain is in fact a country which, though once inhabited by hobbits, is only around fifty years old and stuck in a state of permanent adolescence. This will make them doubt their teachers and probably end up becoming anarchists. So while congratulating my colleagues on the quality of their satire, in the end I think it was misjudged and could end up doing serious damage to our tourism industry.
Thank goodness the whole thing is now turned over to the athletes.
I didn't see it, I refused to. I have no interest in seeing the wasted cash directly, it would turn my stomach.
For example, "celebrating" the NHS has cost it the ability to treat how many people?
You are right. It was fabulous seeing the things I care about being celebrated and that hasn't happened for a long long time from Left, Right and/or Centre. We have been beaten into submission by scandals from MPs, bankers, the Press and anyone else we laid our trust in. This is OUR country and we should keep fighting to keep it a fair and just country. I thank Danny Boyle for reminding me.
Yes. All good fun. And jolly patriotic.
I don't think I was alone in being excited & proud but acutely 'embaressed' in equal parts, with particular reference to the interesting re-working of the 'Industrial Revolution' narrative.
Where were Mr Marx and Mr Engels who carefully and dispassionately described the suffering of the ordinary people of Manchester in the the shadow of the greed of the Northen Industrialists during the Industrial Revolution? Satanic mills and fat sadistic stove-hatted capitalists.
Shame on all you 'Liberals' who deny this reality.
Er, would this be the Mr Marx who spent his whole life leeching off Engels, who in turn spent his whole life leeching off his rich daddy whose family made their money grinding the faces of the poor in industrial revolution Germany?