In praise of regional journalism
Will we miss it when its gone? I think we will.
By Steven Baxter Published 18 June 2011 12:39
I've been accused of being a little unfair towards journalists in the past, which is somewhat ironic given that I laughably call myself one -- but let me put it right anyway.
Most journalists I've met, and worked with, and known, are hardworking, diligent, decent folk. They mostly come from good families, and god knows their parents tried -- but for some tragic reason, their offspring at one time or another came to the sad conclusion that they'd be better off writing or broadcasting things for a living.
It's not their fault. You don't choose journalism as a career: it finds you, whether you want it to or not.
You don't really want to be doing what you're doing for a living, but sooner or later, you just seem to have ended up doing it -- and by then, it's too late. You're doomed. It's somewhere warm to go during the day, and people don't bother you too much -- except for when those rude folk from the general public dare to use the telephone to try and contact you -- so it makes for an acceptable lifestyle.
Better than sitting around the park with a three litre bottle of cider, anyway, or whatever it is that we'd be up to otherwise. It could be worse, couldn't it.
I have spent most of my career working in the regional press, which is a curious thing, a world of residents up in arms, old ladies complaining about their boilers and old Jaff from down the dominoes club wondering when his bloody league tables are going to go in the paper.
It's a world where, when they get a letter from the PCC, editors are actually dismayed and worried about the consequences, rather than shrugging it off as a gnat-bite inconvenience. It's a world where, more often than not, people really care about what they write, because they can see the consequences.
You're actually working right next door to the people you're writing about. There isn't that level of detachment; you know that what you say and write can really upset someone, and they're often within walking distance of your office - even if, as is often the case nowadays, your newspaper has been relocated to some faceless industrial estate in the middle of nowhere rather than the middle of town. You can't hide when people come calling with complaints -- and if they're legitimate, you're left feeling ruined about what you've done to them.
I say all this for few reasons.
Firstly, as I say it's to right a perceived wrong, in that I may appear to have seemed to be anti-journalist or anti-newspaper in the things I've said and written, whereas the reality couldn't be further from that. Secondly, these hardworking, underpaid, undervalued hacks at local rags -- and "local rag" really is a term of affection among readers, no matter what wafer-thin-skinned editors might tell you otherwise - are dwindling in their numbers, not because they're actually no longer needed, but to prop up the profits of their huge parent corporations.
Just this week, more job losses appear to be on the way, at Johnston Press in Yorkshire. Other newspaper groups are doing the same -- or will be soon. Journos at the place where I learnt my craft, the South London Guardian, has been out on strike this week, complaining about an entire sports and leisure department being told they're at risk of redundancy.
And even as I was writing this, news came through of more jobs under threat, this time in Newcastle.
Wherever you live, the people who are writing about your local city, town or village are becoming fewer and fewer in number, and the decline is, if anything, accelerating.
Yes yes, blogs and hyperlocal sites will fill some of the void, but not all of it. Now is the time to value those local journalists more than ever, perhaps unfairly bundled in along with the worst extremes of the red-tops.
Will we miss them when we're gone? I think we will. People trust regional papers more than other news sources; they don't approach the local rag with the same jaded cynicism they might reserve for a national. But, whether they think that or not, the memos about "difficult trading conditions" and "tough choices" will be sent out in more and more newsrooms in the coming weeks and months.
Something has been started that isn't going to be stopped, I am afraid. And the impact it has on what news we get about where we live is only just beginning.
The readers aren't stupid; they've noticed the difference already. And it's only going to get worse as time goes on.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















16 comments
http://www.holdthefrontpage.co.uk/2011/news/northcliffe-daily-to-go-week...
He used to visit a cop and his family at their home, and supply him with ciggies, and his kids with ice-cream. He got really close to a really sexy Yakuza woman and an Australian prostitute. Very attached. http://www.yourcareerguide.org
Do me a favour. How about we get journalism back period. The lap dog press parading as guard dog hasn't had a corporate/political scalp worth the reading since Watergate.
Dunstan - you're the kind of press officer I would like to have worked with.
My time on regionals was brilliant - it was so educational. I went home and cried after a tough day several times, but always learned from it. The part in this piece about caring about what we write because we can see the consequences is so true.
I was one of the last in my organisation to be taken on unqualified and then trained up, before they started to recruit directly from the journalism grad schools. It was an invaluable way to start my career and this piece reflects exactly how I feel about the industry.
Amazing Mr Divine, we do seem to have the same views on quite a few subjects.
I'm not shagging anyone's bums either side of the Bristol Channel so quit fighting over me.
The best article on the current state of the local newspaper indutsry I've read in a long time - spot on.
Also worth mentioning that when we do go, as surely we will, the national news will also suffer as it will no longer be able to 'lift'our stories.
All we'll be left with in the red-tops is gossip about Eastenders and the odd bit of new from Westminster.
To be fair, when the Evening Post called me a hypocrite on the front page, they did allow me and my colleague a right of reply in a double page spread.
They did however continue to stereotype feminists in rather ugly ways (if you'll pardon the pun - ahem!), encouraging the commenters to indulge in some pretty hideous online bullying.
So it is a tricky balance.
Ehtch Tee
You sad person, go and crawl back into your cave, I can't be bothered to argue with a plonker like you.
When I started out as a trainee reporter on a local paper years ago and said I was interested in politics the news editor snorted and said, 'Politicians? We make 'em and we break 'em.' Kelvin Mackenzie's Dad that was.
You are so right, the nationals are so fixed in their tiny little ruts and now seem intent on ruining reputations rather than supplying real news and exposing real sludge they are becomming unreadable.
Actually you're right about journalists to some extent. There must be all sorts of journalists.
Read Jake Adelstein's book 'Tokyo Vice'. He was the first journalist in a top newspaper in Japan writing in Japanese. He was an American that graduated from Sophia University and worked only with Japanese. He would hang out with cops to find crime stories as a crime reporter. He covered the Lucie Blackman murder, as well as Japanese Vice, Human Trafficking, Loan Sharking and the Yakuza.
How about that Stuart! 'You are so right' in both our first sentences and neither of us knew the other person was going to write that. Look at the times of the post!
When you're talking of attachment that journalists get then you should read how involved Jake Adelstein got. He used to visit a cop and his family at their home, and supply him with ciggies, and his kids with ice-cream. He got really close to a really sexy Yakuza woman and an Australian prostitute. Very attached.
I spent 14 years on my local council, and got to know a succession of local journalists, who entered and left the papers via a revolving door. Some left for bigger publications, others to be professional media officers.
We had occasional run-ins, but we mostly got on well. What always struck me was how hard a time they had: paid a pittance, with a lot of space to fill each week. The editorial control seemed to be "light touch", so they had a lot of responsibility on their young shoulders.
Of course we played to this: we'd feed a steady stream of partisan press releases, and occasionally they would pick one up (presumably short of copy that week).
It's a shame big name journalists have got the whole profession a bad name. It's a noble profession, to learn about a subject very quickly, write a piece as objectively and accurately yet engagingly as possible, and then quickly move on to the next piece. I salute you all (well mostly).
Post new comment