I may not actually win...

Sian urges London's voters to send out a strong message over green issues by voting for her first, L

Okay, I’m going to be painfully honest and admit I have a very slim chance of becoming Mayor of London after the ballots are counted on 2 May. I’m being asked why I’m standing a lot at the moment, and the truth is it’s not because I think I’m actually going to be Mayor.

But, I do believe in giving voters a full choice of candidates in every election, and I know that many voters will want to send a strong message about wanting more progress on green and social justice issues, and that’s what a Green first vote is all about. Then, as I have blogged before, I am recommending people cast their final round votes for Ken Livingstone to save London from the horror of becoming Boris Johnson’s playpen for the next four years.

This is what I’m calling their ‘insurance’ vote, and I also have an insurance policy of my own in this election. I am fourth on our London Assembly londonwide list, and so I do have a realistic chance of becoming an Assembly Member after election day.

Provided we run a decent campaign (which of course I’m largely responsible for making sure of, working in the high-profile mayoral candidate role), I think we should be able to win the confidence of the same proportion of London voters as in the last council elections in 2006. This was 13.5%, and would just about be enough to put me in via the fiendishly complicated D’Hondt counting system used to assign the list seats.

The only problem – and it’s not a small one - is the pitifully tiny amount of attention actually given to the Assembly elections by the ‘Boris and Ken show’ obsessed press. Hardly anyone is aware we have a progressive, almost-fair, PR-based system for the Assembly election, or that they can vote for who they like and be sure their vote will count towards winning AMs for their chosen party. Hopefully this will improve though, as the campaign goes on, and of course I’m doing my little bit by posting this here.

It’s a double shame for us in the Greens that the Assembly is so invisible in this election, because our current two AMs, Darren Johnson and Jenny Jones, have made far and away the best job of being on the Assembly over the past four years. I have honestly never known two more hardworking, morally upright and astute politicians.

Unlike the part-timers from the other parties, they have worked tirelessly to make London better; and not just on green issues either. Some people are aware that Livingstone’s increased investment in cycling and home energy-efficiency is down to their casting vote over his budget each year. But how many know that they were also responsible for the creation of the Living Wage Unit, which calculates what a Londoner really needs to earn to pay for the basic essentials and enables campaigners such as London Citizens to go out and shame big employers like Citigroup into paying their cleaners decently?

The scale of their achievements came home to me the other day, when I was putting together this webpage, listing what they have got done. Yes, as they (probably) say, ‘you can take the woman out of the web manager job, but you can’t completely take the web manager out of the woman’, so fiddling with the London Green Party website is still my spare time hobby. The amount of material was so large I ended up putting it over four pages in the end, and it still needed a list of id-tagged contents at the top of each page.

So, while a Tory monopoly will still leave us with lots to do, my two hopes for this election are that, first, we retain a Mayor over which the Greens have an influence and, second, that I can be working alongside them in City Hall making it all happen.

To find out who you should be voting for on May 1st visit our Fantasy Mayor site.

30 comments

taghioff.info's picture

Good luck Sian.

Believer's picture

Go Go Sian!!! We are fed up with Livingstons Face!!!! Yours is much prettier!!!!! BTW I hope if you win you will do something about the way Council Homes are dispersed!!!! Should go to the people who were born in this country first before going to immigrants from other country's!!!! The cost of the housing market also needs to come down and a cap put on the value of homes depending on area!!!!

ingo's picture

Mentioning the obvious, actually, does not really air the issues Londoners want to talk about and I would have advised her against blogging such defeatismn.

If Sian would not have stood, all the non hopers who dare not stick their own heads over the paraphet, ever, would have nobody to vote for, so good luck, now and next time, Sian, at least you could be bothered to run, hopefully again in future, because, Unlike darren Johnson, you have to keep at it. ingo

Believer's picture

Hi, i'm going to vote for the Greens as i did last time round because i believe in what they are trying to achieve and what they stand for!! I hope Sian wins but as she has stated the other parties get all the limelight!!!! I have a question, why does the current Mayor and PM care more about the Olympics than the publics safety? Surely our safety is more important! How much is being spent on the Olympics? This could and should be spent on safer transport especially after the suicide attacks in London!! Forget the Olympics and remember the People!!!! Forget about the Cash this event would bring and think about our safety first!! Greed is just way too far ahead of any other issues in this World and that is where the problems lie!!!

howardp's picture

It is important that people stand for what they believe in, whatever the prevailing opinions. It's taken a while for the world to come around to the Green agenda and it's due to the actions of people like Sian. Standing this time raises these crucial issues, increases awareness and increases the chance that next time Greens will have a better chance. Bravo, Sian!

Emma1's picture

I've just voted for you and posted my ballot paper. Good luck Sian!

Robert.Cunningham's picture

I support much of what the Greens say on the environment, but their stance on most other issues is too socialist for me.

So I'm afraid I won't be voting Green in the near future, either in the mayoral or general elections.

soundjat keita1's picture

Another wasted red-green campain. If only we had a green-green party.

Grahame Priest's picture

You really shouldn't blame the media's Boris & Ken show for the likelihood of you losing. I've just spent half an hour poring over your manifesto. Saying you want to do something without telling us how you'd do it, isn't a policy - it's an aspiration. If you don't consider the impact, quantify the costs and describe a suitable implementation strategy, people will just rubbish your suggestions. It's a shame really because there's some really imaginative initiatives described, but they'll stay imaginative initiatives unless you tell voters how you intend to deliver and what it's going to cost them.

On a less serious note – you've missed a few key policy initiatives that might contribute. So for what they're worth I'll suggest them for free. :-)

Make notionally 'unemployed' people work for their benefits in recycling centres sorting out our rubbish for us. This will reduce land-fill, increase recycling and in approximately one week massively reduce the number of people who say they can't find work when 800,000 Eastern Europeans seem to have no difficulty whatsoever. This will reduce immigration due to fewer available job vacancies, correspondingly reduce pressure on local services, and go at least a little way towards your stated aim of reducing the population to sustainable levels. It'll also increase the quality time available to hard-working families who would otherwise be spending their valuable time washing, grading and sorting their trash into appropriate receptacles. You'll be pleased to know this is entirely cost neutral.

Then there's anti-social behaviour orders. Let's abolish them and free up valuable police / court time to chase more serious criminals. We can hold parents responsible for the actions of their offspring, even when drunk and unsupervised at midnight, and make the receipt of child benefit conditional on attending good parenting classes. These can be run through the 'Sure Start' scheme, thus justifying the 4 billion pounds bill we spend on 'jobs for the girls'. You'll be pleased to know this too should be cost neutral, although I'm sure a good many Green supporters will have no issue with the money saved on graffiti clean-ups being re-channelled to cannabis growing in community allotments. So.... no ASBOs, less graffiti, fewer burnt out cars and more dope for our young. All for free. :-)

soundjat keita1's picture

I see that Ken's friends the London billionaires got 15% richer last year, partly thanks to him.

Did the low-waged and the unemployed get 15% richer? No, they got to live in the world's most expensive city. But we're 'umbly grateful. Anyfink we can do to 'elp the rich get richer, guvnor. We knows our place.

Vote 1 - Green 2 - Labour 3- billionairel

dostoyevsky's picture

Something definitely needs to be done about those that leech off of the government. MAKE them work and make it harder for those that loaf to claim benefits. What about introducing things like food and clothes stamps instead of giving them money which they could spend on anything (TVs, designer clothes, drugs, anything they choose). If they want luxuries they should earn them. I don't mind helping those that actually need the help but I'm sick of paying taxes that are wasted on people who are too lazy to get their own jobs.

pink Charlotte's picture

Sian I think you're the only candidate out there with any sense, your heart is in the right place and your policies may only be aspirations but one has to have goals.. I have watched the news eager to see you on the campaign trail but have also noticed the distinct bias in the reports.
I realise what you are saying about using the second vote for Ken but I don't know if I can quite bring myself to do that.. can't I just vote for you twice?! :)
As for the crap comments posted about dole scroungers, I bet none of them have ever tried bringing up children as a single parent whilst trying to go to college to improve job prospects and chances of a career only to find yourself blocked at every stage by government policies used to massage the unemployment figures, in order to get the pittance given out as benefit.. designer clothes my arse!!! I'd like to see that person survive on jobseekers allowance and bring up a hungry teenage son and try to keep on a further education course whilst holding down part time work, so as to hopefully get a decent job somewhere in the future?

catdorey's picture

Dear Sian,

Thanks for giving us a chance to vote for a candidate with honesty, integrity, and a passion for protecting our planet and all it inhabitants – present and future. You have my vote and my respect.

stander's picture

Thank you for deleting my earlier comment; nothing like open debate and this is nothing like ....

VC's picture

Oh dear.....first its Mr Lynas pitching for Livingston and now Ms Berry is on the same wagon.LOL

murphy38's picture

what silly comments some people post! Well done Sian for pointing out such important things. I had no idea about the voting system or the influence the green AMs have had and i read 2 papers most days...

soundjat keita1's picture

Why should we vote "Green", considering it supports Cuba, with its one party elections? Logically, the Greeds must want to end multi-party elections.

Will you be making it clear that "Greens" support unlimited immigration, i.e mega-cities?

And that you support breaking the law by taking illegal drugs (see GP web-site)? With the medieval argument that the laws don't apply to you if you don't like them.

isiahdunn110's picture

@ Grahame Priest

By your definition, every single major candidate's manifesto contains aspirations, rather than policies. Take transport as an example. Every candidate says a lot, and yet very little, on it. Boris doesn’t know how much his vaunted Routemasters would cost. Paddick's page on transport is a long series of, "We wills," without any plans to back them up. As for Ken, I’ll quote his section on the Tube:

“Over the next four years among the improvements that will be introduced are:
• Start constructing Crossrail, linking Heathrow to the West End, the City
and Canary Wharf and the Thames Gateway
• New trains on the Victoria Line with better accessibility, audio
announcements and ventilation and an increased service on the line
• Air conditioning on new trains on the Circle, District, Metropolitan,
Hammersmith and City lines, and air cooling on the Piccadilly line
• Refurbished District Line trains with enhanced CCTV and better information
• 30% addition to capacity on the Jubilee Line with higher service frequencies
• New seventh car to increase capacity on all Hammersmith and City trains
• 25 per cent of stations to have step free access
• Major schemes to provide more space for passengers at Kings Cross St
Pancras, Paddington, West Ham, and Shepherds Bush, with work underway
at Highbury and Islington, Finsbury Park, Tottenham Court Road, Bank,
Vauxhall, Bond Street and Victoria.
• New Olympic station at Stratford Regional, and new station at
Wood Lane.”

Again, no estimates of cost, no detailed plans for implementation. Manifestos seem to be thin on detail in this campaign. If you object to that, then fine - I’d agree that they need more detailed explanation. But surely it’s unfair to hold that against any one particular candidate?

As for the policy suggestions – interesting as they are, do they actually fall in the remit of the Mayor? ASBOs, at least, were bought in by the Home Office, and presumably rest with them.

Nice of you to offer them for free, though…:)

The Carbon Coach's picture

Sian you are a legend! Well done and keep it up!

Derek Bennett's picture

Forget these silly wishy, washy green issues which are just another method used to extract even more taxes from us. Lets scrap the expensive Congestion charge which victimises the less well off, vote for a candidate that comes from London, cares about London and will work for London.

That person is Gerrard Batten of the UK Independence Party.

Grahame Priest's picture

@Douglas Johnson

I know. I'm just too generous! Lol.

I appreciate the accuracy of your comment on the paucity of detail in just about every manifesto going and agree they're all light on detail. And additionally, I'll admit I was referring to the Green's national policy manifesto as opposed to any mayoral pronouncements.

I know my tongue-in-cheek suggestions don't strictly fall in the remit of the mayor. But they do perhaps fall within the remit of this mayoral candidate given she was / is their main spokesperson on policy matters as I understand it.

Still - the rubbish one she could do if she was elected. I'm not letting her off the hook that lightly! :-)

Just in case anyone thinks I'm anti-green, I'm not. Boris Johnson's evasion on the cost of routemasters (NewsNight) was cringemaking. Paddick just waffled in the wind and Livingstone wouldn't get my vote unless he was pulling my fingernails out with hot pincers. I would though have liked to have seen Sian there, and think she might have made a good fist of it in comparison. All the main parties are vulnerable on green issues.

But I can't write any more. Got some rubbish to sort, rinse, grade, bag, tag and store. Where are the unemployed when you need 'em most eh?

LondonStrategicVoter's picture

Vote Sian 1 Ken 2

London Strategic Voter has come to the same conclusion at www.strategicvoter.org.uk

The site gives you ward-by-ward information on how the 2004 London elections went in the ward where you live - and contains information that may surprise you about how many people in your area oppose both New Labour and the Tories, and share the view that a better, more democratic political choice is needed. In 2004, across London, 47% of people voted for parties other than Tory or New Labour.

Max2's picture

Dear Sian, I will be voting for you - but not for Ken, who needs a good long nap. Good luck.

adrianwindisch's picture

Well done Sian, lets get a good green vote out on May the 1st. It has an effect on local elections around the country, where people see you standing up to buisness as usual grey parties represented by Boris/Ken/Paddick.

Kevinman's picture

Boris Johnson, a befuddled bumbler who looks like an extra from Worzel Gummidge, only with less scarecrow charisma. Get a haircut or do a Robert Plant- not some hirsute limbo look. Brian Paddick, respectable candidate, but a tad bland. Ken, hmmm... he's done nothing bad to London. We need new people, uncorrupted with sleaze, new ideas, a new agenda- new labour has been right wing with red feathers, a bit disappointing. Please do something about litter louts, people lack respect for their locale! And companies who produce junk mail should be fined! 'promotional literature' is a disease! 4 x 4's are for the country folk who like fox hunting and horse trials (the pony did it!). I've had enough of pointless politicians who recycle only rhetoric and rubbish policies. Make a change- Go Green, Go Sian!

Lambda's picture

Am I the only one that thinks sian is Hot? :D

secondvote's picture

I'm a supporter of Green Party policies, but I believe Sian has been giving out misleading information regarding the 'second vote' system, as stated in this blog post and delivered to all London households last weekend. Sian's statement implies that you can vote for Sian first, knowing full well that she is unlikely to be mayor, just to make a political statement, and Ken second. She implies that your second vote for Ken will be definitely counted. That is not true - the second vote only gets counted if no candidate gets more than 50% of the votes. With Boris ahead in the polls, this was a risky game to play. Whoever voted Sian 1 Ken 2 has probably just voted for Boris :(

Catriona's picture

FAO Grahame Priest:
"Make notionally 'unemployed' people work for their benefits in recycling centres sorting out our rubbish for us.... ...people who say they can't find work when 800,000 Eastern Europeans seem to have no difficulty whatsoever."

Those 800,000 people **have already been trained by someone else**.
And, as they are only here temporarily, they are willing to accept *lower standards of living* (e.g. shared accommodation) than permanent residents, in order to send money 'home'.

NO COMPANY is willing reduce profits by wasting money on TRAINING indigenous Britons (of any 'race') when they can instead hire foreigners who were trained by someone else.

As for your idea of forcing the unemployed to work at recycling centres - HOW are you going to get them to the sites?
Cost neutral? You're having a laugh!

Want to stop people 'loafing about' on welfare?
You need to TRAIN them to give them marketable skills.

But would you ever agree to stump up the taxes to do that?
Or to force private sector companies to train and employ Britons?

Both ideas would, after all, cost money - whereas demonising the unemployed IS 'cost neutral'.

ingo's picture

It must be obvious to all now that promises of a referendum on a EU constitution were 'aspirations' , as clearly stressed by the courts this year.
They actually had the gall to use public money to get this rubber let out close, so why this focus on promises by the Greens, they are no different as that of any other party, equally their membership, they are not something special just another centrally led party, so whatever you may make of aspirational policies and manifestos, it ain't what you expect.

dostoyevsky's picture

People like Derek (above) are exactly what's wrong with the world. If we really want to help the less well off, we should decrease the amount of pollution we're causing! Londoners, even the less well off, have a quality of life a thousand times better than others, especially in poorer countries. In fact, people are starving to death right next to fields of grain which they're forbidden to eat because it's sent to the UK to feed animals instead! And people here have the nerve to complain about congestion charges when they're lucky enough to even have a car. If it's that important then just cut down on some luxuries which you no doubt spend your money on.

Why can't we just appreciate things and stop complaining? If you have clothes, a roof over your head and food in your stomach then you're well off.

We should stop being so selfish and start thinking about the world we're ruining... I mean what's the point in having kids when we don't care about the world they, or their children, will have to live in?

It's time that those in power had some heart as well as intellect. Good Luck Sian!

Latest tweets