Whoever wins the Labour leadership must distance the party from Murdoch
In defence of Caroline Crampton
By James Macintyre Published 14 September 2010 16:06
I have been surprised by the number of Labour people who have got in touch today to question the wisdom of my colleague Caroline Crampton's blog last night suggesting that David Miliband should look into the relationship between New Labour and the Murdochs. Surprised because the very idea of Labour distancing itself from the mogul's empire appears to be a non-starter int he eyes of many.
The ultra-close relationship between New Labour and Murdoch -- needless because Murdoch does not, contrary to conventional wisdom, determine the result of elections; he merely backs the winner -- is something I have been pursuing through the Freedom of Information Act for some time.
Any reflection on that relationship leads to the conclusion that it was one that -- as Neil Kinnock rightly and colourfully warned Alastair Campbell in the early days of Blair's premiership -- was a bad one for Labour. The support of the Sun, and the importance attached to that by New Labour figures, finally came back to haunt Labour dramatically at the last general election. But the poisonous effects of New Labour's courting of a right-wing press whose agenda was always diametrically opposed to Labour's could be seen well before that.
It would be to the credit of any new Labour leader to pursue his own agenda and not let it be influenced unnecessarily by outside forces ultimately out to get him. If the party can't get that at this stage then it has no hope of "moving on" from the Blair-Brown years.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















5 comments
It took 33 words before you mentioned he that must be mentioned.
No political party can afford to distance themselves from Murdoch!
What a curious sort of political party that imagines itself to be defined by its concern for social justice and yet never, ever, takes a principled stand against unjust power.
We already have at least one political party that exists for the sole purpose of holding office. What, precisely, is the Labour Party supposed to be for? More precisely, when is the party leadership going to get over the 1980s and grow a sodding spine?
And what do I see when I click on the blog pages of the NS? An advert for times online.
Pot? Kettle anyone?
Agreed - some perspective when dealing with media moguls would be very welcome.
If we treat NI as what it is, rather than what we fear, then they lose some of their power.
And we must defend an independent BBC - something that post-Hutton New Labour lost sight of.
Post new comment