Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

Ed Balls and me

Yes, he’s a bruiser. But he is also a lethal weapon in Labour’s armoury.

I thought I knew all about Ed Balls. But when I went to interview him for a piece in today's magazine, I was forced to think again.

Balls was one of the very few senior Labour figures -- along with Douglas Alexander and, to be fair, Ed Miliband -- who recognised the truth about David Cameron's leadership of the Tories: that it was not "centrist" but, in fact, a supremely skilful cover-up of what remained a conventional right-wing agenda on the areas that matter, such as fiscal policy.

He (rightly) attacked the Tories as right-wing while other New Labour figures awarded Cameron the tag of "moderniser".

Today, though he could be accused of lacking a coherent "vision" for Labour's future, he has already won the leadership contest when it comes to scrutinising the coalition government, with his articulate and forceful attacks on Tories and Lib Dems in equal measure.

Yes, he is hard, aggressive and combative. But his fearlessness and drive -- almost limitless -- are a lethal weapon against a fragile coalition that is crying out for strong opposition.

He is, as I say in today's piece, the only candidate willing to take on, for example, the dominant, Tory-dominated media in this country. Though he has allies in the right-wing and Murdoch press, one would hope he would be one of the very few politicians in Westminster unafraid of refusing to tailor his message, adapt his policies and award such media barons the disproportionate influence they do not deserve.

I can think of only Kenneth Clarke and Charles Kennedy who, if they were in positions of power, would defy Rupert Murdoch. I like to think Balls would do the same.

Balls is a divisive figure, without question. But he is supposedly the "Marmite" candidate you either love or hate. On this I disagree. He -- and his candidacy -- are a complicated mix. He will probably not win: the crown will almost certainly go to one of the Miliband brothers. But that he has earned his place as a very serious contender is no longer in doubt.

In my piece, I make a small confession, saying I have at times been wary of him. Well, here is another confession (forgive the self-indulgence): I am something of an Ed Balls convert.

And no, that is not an endorsement. But it is an appeal for everyone to consider all the candidates with an open mind.

Tags: Ed Balls

7 comments

Dave C's picture

Balls needs to get his contact lenses sorted out, or go back to spectacles.

Whenever he does an interview, he continually makes rather distracting blinking gestures, which make him look slightly bonkers.

Sam's picture

Yes, no doubt that the poor in this country are very thankful to Ed Balls and Labour for their 'left wing' fiscal policy.

It's the height of strangeness that all the countries that have been practicing economic conservatism are now on the road to strong growth and can carrying on developing their countries to help those most in need.

Dave C's picture

@Sam

Could you give us some some examples of "countries that have been practising economic conservatism are now on the road to strong growth"?

Rob's picture

Ha, ha, ha, the tories certainly fully agree with you James that blinky Balls is a lethal weapon.... unfortunately for you, they recognise that he's lethal to labour's electoral prospects... indeed he's the guarrantee that Labour will never get back into government... see Guido's championing of Blinky (the vain bastard, what's wrong with wearing specs):
http://order-order.com/tag/balls/

swatantra nandanwar's picture

I've never had much time for Ken Clarke or Charles Kennedy, their talent have been vastly over rated; both are 'loungers'.
Balls is far to divisive to even be considered. What the Party needs is a unifier, not an overbearing personality. Whatbthe Party needs is Burnham.

atethebastard's picture

What a faceless evil cretin this man is to any party..he is the true face of a "power luster" he must NEVER be trusted or put a position of responsibility.

Amy's picture

Totally agree with this piece. The Labour Party would be stupid to overlook Balls. He is going from strength to strength at the hustings...

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets