The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Labour comes out against Gove's new exams

Shadow education secretary Stephen Twigg criticises GCSE replacement as a "return to the 1980s".

Education Secretary Michael Gove. Photograph: Getty Images.
Education Secretary Michael Gove will today announce plans to replace GCSEs with new exams. Photograph: Getty Images.

Since Michael Gove's GCSE replacement won't be introduced until 2015, with the first exam papers sat in 2017, Labour's response to the reforms is more significant than usual. As Helen noted yesterday, if elected in 2015, the party could simply scrap them.

So, where does Labour stand? Shadow education secretary Stephen Twigg yesterday focused almost exclusively on criticising Gove's decision to announce the changes through the Mail on Sunday, rather than parliament, a reliable sign of indecisiveness (who ever heard of a politician leaking information to the press?). But ahead of the Education Secretary's statement to MPs at 3:30pm, Twigg has issued a more robust condemnation of the plans. He said:

The problem with these changes are they are totally out of date, from a Tory-led Government totally out of touch with modern Britain. Whatever the reassurances, this risks a return to a two-tier system which left thousands of children on the scrap heap at the age of 16. Why else are the changes being delayed until 2017?
 
Schools do need to change as all children stay on in education to 18 and we face up to the challenges of the 21st Century. We won't achieve that with a return to the 1980s. Instead, we need a system that promotes rigour and breadth, and prepares young people for the challenges of the modern economy.

While that's not a cast-iron commitment to repeal the reforms, the strength of Twigg's criticism means that it will be hard for Labour to avoid doing so. Elsewhere, Stewart Wood, Ed Miliband's consigliere and a member of the shadow cabinet, has tweeted: "I've spent 2 hours trying to find evidence to back the scrapping of continuous assessment in favour of 100% exam-based marks. No joy so far."

Update: Nick Gibb, who was schools minister until the reshuffle, has said that Labour would not able to scrap the exams if elected in 2015. Here's his (rather persuasive) explanation:

Well, [Labour] won’t be able to because schools will already be preparing for it from September 2014. They won’t be the government in 2014. If – and I hope it doesn’t happen – they win the election in 2015, schools will already be prepared and it will be too late for the government to change the policy. Schools will be already ready to teach these exams. We had the same issue when we came into office; we were unhappy with the modular GCSE English that was starting to be taught in September 2010. It was too late to change it and then we’ve seen the problem we’ve had this year because of that.

7 comments

hugh markey's picture

My, Oh My. One exam board? Where's all this competition like? Surely, competing, especially after a successful Olympics and Paralympics, is the bedrock of the free enterprise system.
Multiple choice and tick box alert - Mikey has made a fundamental error - the twit!

Silly Ass

slowprop's picture

It pains me to admit that Gove may be right about the need to toughen up standards to raise the level of the high acheivers.

But there was nothing about what there is for the least acheiving kids. Why - because time and time again this governmentproves it cares absolutely nothing about those who are at the bottom. Historically this is typical tory trait and unlikey to return unless we have return to trench warefare.

Simon Gothard's picture

Surprise surprise Labour oppose reform. Under Labour education, education, education turned into education, edcashun, edukayshun. The kids being turned out now are thick and need remedial English and maths before they start college/uni.

Barrie J's picture

So, where does Labour stand?

Based on "Education, education, education" and what we see as the result, who knows where they stand?
My impression of New Labour's years in office suggests more privatisation and faster.
Twigg is useless and like any politician or Party will say anything in Opposition, mostly meaningless twaddle.
You can't put a blade between New Lab and the Tories (amongst whom I include the Limp Damps).
Expect politics but no meaningful and achievable change.

Gareth's picture

But Gove's reasoning never seems to extend beyond "any change is good". Stewart Wood's comment illuminates the main difference between the parties: Labour's instinct is to seek out hard evidence, Gove introduces wide-reaching "reforms" based on unsupported hunches. I'd rather have a politician who thinks, researches, reflects and then responds. The right change, not just any (untested) change. Labour needs to call Gove on his approach before he inflicts lasting damage to our education system.

Herbert's picture

'Labour's instinct is to seek out hard evidence...'

Excuse me while I go and change my trousers. I've just wet myself laughing.

Gareth's picture

That's a perfect example of the empty rhetoric I'm talking about. Perhaps once you've regained bodily control, you can come back and substantiate your point.

Latest tweets