The left cannot remain silent over "honour killings"
We have become complicit in this epidemic of abuse and violence by not doing more to challenge it.
By Sunny Hundal Published 04 August 2012 9:10
A mourner lays flowers at the memorial to Hatun Surucu, was shot in the head and killed by her youngest brother Ayhan Surucu in an "honour killing" in 2005. Photograph: Getty Images.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists





















69 comments
Bingo, Spud. Crisp, concise, and on the mark.
@margot, its pretty obvious why. It is like a game of top trumps. Not speaking out against the appalling attitude of extremist and ignorant muslims against women is trumped by not wanting to be seen as racist. The left are hypocritical wankers who have a name for everyone that does not agree with them, be it racist, mysoginist, bigot, islamaphobe etc. Consequently nobody is able to have a proper debate on these issues without being branded. They are a joke and a disgrace as well as abandoning their traditional voters. The last paragraph in this article sums up exactly why the left should never get a sniff of power ever again, even if it does mean having the tories.
"in the past, most left-wing intellectuals and activists avoided the issue of cultural integration for good reason: it was usually a code-word for assimilation and conjured up images of whites telling others their way of life was inferior. "
Er, but the muslim way of life IS inferior.
Plain John, I strongly feel you articulate what drives many. I know because the thought is not far from my mind. What we lack however is perspective, that is the ability to see with-out the propaganda of the society you live within. How does the slaughter in Vietnam or Iraq, and the rest look to 'others'? Do a few halfwits on the fringes of a largely moralistic small footprint cultural norm compare to a rapacious society often run by the amoral or immoral? Not saying which is better just remembering that all races and cultures contain individuals like me, or you.
Inferior to what? Inferior to the 'life' conjured up by the white Nazi regime?
frankly I am more concerned about the Paki murders and rapes of indigenous white girls.
Howabout both John. And then we wouldn't have to call you Racist John Smith who thinks some human beings are superior to others?
Since when has 'the left' been quiet over 'honour' killings? Oh, you mean the liberal 'I've got my career to consider' pretend-left? 'The left' has also never been quiet over the vicious idiocy of all religions, unlike the liberal pretend-left.
No True Scotsman, eh?
Oh yes all the morons on "my" side don't count because they are "false", this is always a terribly convenient position for everyone, and utterly useless.
"Shafilea had warned that her parents were trying to marry her off to Pakistan"
What? The whole of Pakistan? Is that technically possible? Or is 'Pakistan' here used as shorthand for an oppressive and undesirable existence? A bit of a lazy and biased generalisation...what might in other circumstances be referred to as bigoted, racist even.
That said, I'm pretty sure I know what Sunny means...and I don't even disagree. I just think its a tad hypocritical that he should get away with it when it's precisely the kind of thing he'd normally jump on with sanctimonious glee. Mind you, his whole 'courageous stance' is precisely the sort of thing that he's been using to try to smear the likes of Nick Cohen as a bigot for years.
I applaud his change of heart but if he's doing any more than bowing to the inevitable, he really should fess up that he's been a major player in the 'left's' complicity for years. The quotes, incidentally are an indication that I don't regard the left as guilty; rather the deluded alliance of liberal idiots who like to style themselves 'left wing' cos they like the brand. No doubt now Sunny's come out against it, we'll see a flood of other useful idiots do likewise...I bet Laurie Penny et al will jump on the bandwagon, after a deafening silence on such issues in the past. It's a step in the right direction but not one that should pass without taking note of the appalling past hypocrisy of those involved.
I think the author meant to "her parents were trying to send her off to Pakistan, where, leagally, she could be forced to marry."
I kinda gathered that...clearly my attempt at condescending irony didn't translate... only the carelessness of his phrasing opened him up to criticism on the grounds of a blunt and discriminatory generalisation; which I agree was probably not intended. It was just that this is exactly the sort of slip that Suny has made a career of highlighting to accuse repondents of subconsious bigotry. I was simply repaying the tactic. I should have resisted the urge.
In fact this sort of shoddy strategy has always represented a major plank in bolstering Sunny's liberal credentials. I've never really been that struck by his acuity nor the coherence of his thinking. Cheap shots like this are a hallmark of intellectual imposture and on those grounds, I've always dismissed him as a self-promoting lightweight. I suppose we really should give him the benefit, on the basis of the article, that he's finally grown a pair and has decided to abandon the craven echo chamber of narrow minded liberals who treat the sophisms of multicultural relativism as self-evident truths; from which dissection marks one as a racist, misogynist or homophobic bigot.
Maybe.
I think the author meant to "her parents were trying to send her off to Pakistan, where, leagally, she could be forced to marry."
Unfortunately, no-one dares to bring the subject up, because they will immediately be labelled a racist. The first to jump up and point the finger will be Keith Vaz.
Until we are allowed to debate the whole issue of immigration and multi-culturalism without this accusation, then this kind of murder - for that is what it is - will continue, alongside other culturally acceptable crimes, as witnessed in Rotherham recently.
The left cannot remain silent over "honour killings" Why not... the left have for years. When this young woman's body was found in a stream in North Yorkshire all said from day one "look no further than her own family". Why was that? The level of abuse suffered by young English women at the hands of their bigoted Asian parents has long being ignored not just by the political-left but society as a whole. It's a silence of indifference that's got to end....
A good article that nails it pretty much on the head. It falls down a bit at the end though when dealing with a strategy to deal with the problem. Sunny Hundal talks of integration but then says this:
I'm not calling for a sneering attitude that says, "if you want to be British, you have to integrate into our way of life".
If you drop the sneering attitude, what else is wrong with saying the above?
Quite right. It is not a sneering attitude at all. The addition of the term merely highlights the fear of being branded a racist by the apologists for this kind of cultural brutality.
FckinA.
I totally agree; the left should not remain silent. Unfortunately, the left does remain silent and I've been wondering why. There are many other things about which the left is silent, and it shouldn't and I'd like to know why.