A fall in university applicants is a failure for the coalition
Ministers have always wanted more people to go to university. But 38,000 fewer are.
By George Eaton Published 09 August 2012 9:04
Are higher tuition fees deterring people from applying to university? "Yes" is the answer from the Independent Commission on Fees, chaired by Will Hutton, which has released its first findings today. Applications from English students are down by 8.8% (or 37,000) this year compared with 2010, before the new fees regime was announced. Of note is that the fall in applicant numbers has not been replicated elsewhere in the UK, where fees are lower or non-existent. In Scotland, where home students do not pay fees, applications are up by 1%, while in Wales, where fees are capped at £3,465, they have risen by 0.3 per cent. In Northern Ireland, where fees are also capped at £3,465, applications have fallen by 0.8%. As Hutton notes:
This study provides initial evidence that increased fees have an impact on application behaviour. There is a clear drop in application numbers from English students when compared to their counterparts in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
Of some comfort to the government is the fact that there has been almost no decline in applications from poorer students, with applications from the most disadvantaged fifth of the population down by just 0.2 per cent in England. In addition, the reduction in overall applications is partly explained by a fall in the number of young people. But only partly. The inescapable fact is that fees of up to £9,000, the highest public university fees in the world, are deterring would-be students. For the coalition, this is a clear failure of policy. Unlike some Conservatives, higher education minister David Willetts has always insisted that he wants to see more people going to university. In 2011, he said: "It's important that prospective students are not put off applying to university." But the initial evidence suggest that they have been.
The key question is whether this is likely to be a temporary or a permanent reduction. When Labour tripled fees to £3,000, student numbers fell by 15,000 (3.7 per cent) in the first year (2006) but they later more than recovered. Thus, as Hutton says, "it is too early to draw any firm conclusions". But should the reduction prove permanent, the fall in applicants will harm both the UK's long-term growth potential and its levels of social mobility. For Nick Clegg, who has made widening opportunity his priority in government, it is an unhappy prospect.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















8 comments
Daniel; a comment like yours suggests not enough people have been to uni.
Even with a PhD in theoretical astrophysics I have no idea what your comment means, you think I am wrong? You think 50% of people should go to Uni? You think most people use there degrees in their jobs after Uni? Or is it that fluffy rubbish about the value of degrees being more than that? I.e. 'educating' the masses to have the correct, nice lefty liberal views through years of delicate contemplation?
"with applications from the most disadvantaged fifth of the population down by just 0.2 per cent in England."
Typical Tories, putting the burden on the.... oh wait on.
"Of some comfort to the government is the fact that there has been almost no decline in applications from poorer students, with applications from the most disadvantaged fifth of the population down by just 0.2 per cent in England."
"But should the reduction prove permanent, the fall in applicants will harm both the UK's long-term growth potential and its levels of social mobility."
That's some inspiring Olympic-level mental gymnastics there George.
Dear Students of Sheffield hallam, please punish nick clegg in his own seat at the next election in revenge for the many students that will over time be put off both politics (because of his betrayal) and university education (because of the costs)
"Ministers have always wanted more people to go to university. But 38,000 fewer are."
A fall in applications does not mean a fall in the number of students. Student places are the same as last year and the number of applicants still significantly exceeds the number of places.
'A fall in university applications could harm Nick Clegg's goal of increasing social mobility.'
As with my daughter with her 2.1 in Linguistics, now working for the past few years in a series of admin jobs that would have demanded, at most, 5 O levels in my day? 'Increasing social mobility' is a myth beloved of those who are too stupid to recognise that most change comes as a result of changes in the mode of production. Step forward Clegg, Miliband and Cameron.
Seriously? What a pointless article. Everyone knows too many people go to University anyway. I am 27 and the vast majority of my degreed family / friends do not work in jobs in any way relevant to their degrees. Most view it is a waste of time apart from the partying and meeting partners. Uni is basically now just where middle class people go to find a partner, get a 2:1 and get a job that pretends that this is a mark of their suitability for their role.