The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Escaping the Westminster bubble

A new report from Policy Exchange suggests ways in which political parties could try and reconnect w

Wind turbine in Selby
Source: Getty Images

Is there such a thing as the north-south divide when it comes to politics in this country? New Policy Exchange research out tomorrow examines social attitudes towards a number of policy issues. We also explore the perception of voters across the country to modern day politicians and their perceptions of the Conservatives and Labour.

The findings paint a gloomy picture. There’s a strong anti politics mood right across England at the moment, with a real feeling that politicians of all parties are out of touch and don’t understand the real concerns of ordinary people. Over 80 per cent of voters think that “politicians don’t understand the real world at all”. That should be a real warning to Labour and Tory politicians that they should be doing more to respond to voter’s aspirations and worries.

What are these concerns and what can political parties do to reconnect with ordinary voters?

Our poll shows that almost half of the people we asked are worried that their children will not be able to get on in life, with almost 40 per cent saying that they are very or fairly worried about paying their bills. People living in the north, older voters and women felt the squeeze the most.

It’s fairly clear from our poll that much of the anti politics mood derives from a belief that politicians do not understand or empathise with people who are having difficulty making ends meet.

That presents a real challenge for political parties.  The stalemate at the last election showed that neither party managed to sufficiently empathise with or appeal to hard pressed voters.  And our poll shows that the situation has got even worse for the political parties since the election.

What can be done to bridge this divide? We’ve already put forward proposals for Government to cut energy bills and meet their green targets by stopping wasting money on expensive technologies like offshore wind and shifting the focus to more cost effective ways to reduce emissions.  Our recent report on the need to attract people – especially young people - to cities where there are more jobs and higher wages focused on reforming the planning system to enable more good, quality homes to be built in places where people actually want to live.

And our polling suggests that there is even more that political parties can do to show to hard pressed voters that they understand their concerns.

It’s pretty clear that voters want to see politicians who empathise more with their concerns and look and feel more like the modern Britain they know.  When it comes to candidate selection, political parties have been trying hard to look like modern Britain in the past few years.  But, according to voters in our poll they’ve been choosing the wrong priorities.

When asked how political parties could change the way they look and feel, almost half of the ‘Conservative swing’ voters said that the Tories should recruit more MPs with experience outside politics and 42 per cent said the Tories should adopt more working class candidates. Getting more female and ethnic minority MPs was a preoccupation of the first wave of Tory modernisation.  The Tories still have a long way to go on both, and voters still want them to do more. But perhaps because a start has been made, these factors are now a bit further down the list of worries: the top priorities are getting more MPs from working class, and from outside the political class.

Interestingly, the results for Labour were similar – 45 per cent of Labour swing voters wanted the party to adopt more MPs with experience outside politics, 31 per cent wanted more Labour MPs with business experience and 29 per cent said that should be more Labour MPs from working class backgrounds. In focus groups people felt that while the two parties used to be quite different, Labour MPs were now quite similar socially to Tories: public school, Oxbridge, Westminster insiders.

The findings of our survey are pretty stark and equally unsurprising. There is a strong view that the Westminster village is a bubble that doesn’t understand the concerns of voters who are struggling to keep their heads above water. Politicians are believed to be protected from the squeeze by their wealth, expenses and perks. If politicians are going to reconnect with voters, they need to look and feel more representative of working people; they need to make the cost of living their number one priority, and get unemployment down.  The public are losing faith in mainstream politicians.  Having listened to them pouring out their anger and frustration in focus groups, I now worry that if mainstream politicians don’t get better at showing they understand “real Britain”, something really nasty will emerge to fill the vacuum.

Neil O'Brien is director of the thinktank Policy Exchange

2 comments

John L Bell's picture

No mention of fraud committed by upto two hundred MPs from the last Fraudsters' Parliament, I note, as defined in Sections 2-4 of the Fraud Act which was SUPPOSED to come into force in January 2007!

www.johnlbell.blogspot.com

Barrie J's picture

Prior to the 'Expenses Scandal' I wrote to my MP asking a number of serious, relevant and pertinent questions regarding the ever increasing cost of running Parliament.
Apart from telling me that an MP earned £45k prior to 1997 (I managed to work out for myself that they have received an increase of 68% to £66k).
(How many of their constituents have been that lucky?)
He told me that "he was not my unpaid researcher and I could find out what I needed to know myself".
Adding that HRMC considers him 'self employed' not in the employment of the tax payer.
Fortunately in the ensuing scandal, The Telegraph provided much of what I wanted to know and also revealed why my own MP was so reluctant.
He's still there, still as bumptious and self important as ever - some would say much, much more.
A fellow commuter recently told me that he believed our politicians had as much empathy with their constituents as Nazi prison guards had with their charges. Displaying utter arrogance and contempt.
Somebody reading my brief literary encounter might think the same but I really couldn't comment.
They are certainly concerned about maintaining the status quo - you only have to look at the brutal policing of demonstrations and the media manipulation of the reported images.
As for MP's expenses; so the £400 per month food allowance (don't their constituents need to eat?) has been replaced with a £25 per night subsistence allowance, no receipt required for sums less than £25. Mmmmm no change there then.
For myself I'd pay them £100k p.a. five weeks holiday, no other jobs outside of Parliament, a full time staff (no family members).
SPADs to come from the Civil Service not graduate know nothings with a foot on the greasy pole.
Cut their total numbers to 210 and elect 70 of them every three years on a rolling basis.
Manifesto pledges/promises to be binding in law, unless there is a national crises.
Electioneering to be limited to two weeks before an election, and strictly limited to exposure to Press, TV, Radio and Public Meetings.
Let them be judged by results not spin and lies.
The ability to allow constituencies to 'recall' their MPs.

Chapter 2 of 'My Time in Utopia' headed 'Hell will freeze over before MPs .........................' to be shortly serialised.

Latest tweets