Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

Mehdi Hasan

Mehdi Hasan’s polemical take on politics, economics and foreign affairs

Syndicate contentRSS

Our friend and ally, the Kingdom of Bahrain

The latest Human Rights Watch report makes for depressing reading.

Yesterday I tweeted a link to this piece in the Atlantic Monthly on how the repressive Bahraini regime has signed up a top public-relations agency to rebrand its image in the west:

Last year, in the early weeks of Bahrain's violent crackdown on the largely Shia opposition protests, the minister of foreign affairs inked a contract with Qorvis to provide public-relations services for $40,000 per month, plus expenses. One of the largest PR and lobbying firms in Washington, Qorvis employs a number of former top Capitol Hill staffers and also works for Bahrain's close ally, Saudi Arabia. The firm's work for Bahrain came under scrutiny last year when it defended the government's raid last year on a Doctors Without Borders office in Bahrain. Also in 2011, a Qorvis official wrote pro-regime columns in The Huffington Post without revealing his affiliation with Qorvis.

This morning, I was at a breakfast briefing with Joe Stork, deputy director of Human Rights Watch's Middle East and North Africa division, who was discussing the latest HRW report, "No Justice in Bahrain".

From the report's "Summary":

Based on scores of interviews with defendants, former detainees, defense lawyers, and observers of the trials, as well as a comprehensive review of available court records, medical documents, and other relevant material, this report finds that the National Safety Courts repeatedly failed to respect and protect basic due process rights.

And:

Human Rights Watch interviewed eight defendants following their release in February 2011, all of whom said that they had been subjected to torture and ill-treatment, variously reporting beatings, sleep deprivation, forced prolonged standing, and extended detention in solitary confinement. Human Rights Watch had access to photographs of injuries and medical reports of government doctors that corroborated some of these accounts. Not only did the Public Prosecution Office reject without basis the defendants' allegations of abuse, it premised its case largely on evidence that "came out of the mouths of the defendants themselves," indicating that the case was built essentially on confessions.

In his briefing, Stork pointed out how HRW and other human-rights group have had their access to Bahrain "restricted since last April". He also revealed how the UN's special rapporteur on torture, Juan Mendez, who had been planning to visit Bahrain later this month, has been asked by the regime to postpone his trip. What do the Bahrainis - who hired John Yates (!), former assistant commissioner of the Met, to help "reform" their security forces - have to hide?

Perhaps it is the fact that, as Stork bluntly put it:

there is a patina of a justice system operating but, really, it's a joke. There is no way if you're a protester that you're not going to get a conviction in court. . . The prosecutors are part of the problem."

As I noted in the Guardian last year:

The Orwellian regime in Manama continues to round up people for the most minor of "offences". Last month, for example, the 20-year-old university student Ayat al-Qarmezi was arrested, assaulted and sentenced to a year in prison - by a military court - for reading out a poem criticising the king at a rally.

The Bahraini government says things have changed; in a letter to the Times on 22 February, the country's ambassador to the UK, Alice Samaan, wrote:

Last year our country experienced a period of unrest. Sine the demonstrations our response has been to introduce an independent investigation and a programme of reform.

But, as Stork pointed out this morning, the truth is that

just one Bahraini member of the security forces - a lieutenant accused of an extra-judicial killing of a protester - has been charged so far. The rest have been low-level, foreign members of the security forces from Pakistan and elsewhere.

For Stork, "there is no transparency here". For example, the "independent" complaints unit set up to deal with protesters' grievances is based inside - wait for it - the nation's interior ministry. Hmm. And torture and abuses inside police stations may have stopped but, Stork pointed out, what is happening now is that

there are reports of demonstrators being picked up [by the security forces] and beaten before getting to the police station.

So what's our government up to? Er, arming the Bahraini tyrants, that's what. As I wrote in my column in the Times on 14 February:

Between July and September 2011, the [Conservative-Lib Dem] coalition authorised the sale of £2.2 million of arms to the regime. It was reprehensible and irresponsible, an official British betrayal not just of the Bahraini people, but of the Arab Spring itself.

The Bahraini ambassador's 22 February letter in the Times was written in response to my column. She accused me of being "completely inaccurate" and failing

to recognise that Bahrain is one of the most progressive countries in the region.

I put this claim to HRW's Stork. He laughed and said:

The Bahrainis are concerned with their image but there is a huge disconnect between their self-image and what's happening on the ground. Progressive? Perhaps you could call it 'progressive authoritarianism'.

So, I ask again (as I have asked before), why on earth does the UK continue to support, defend and arm a progressive-authoritarian regime, which continues to beat and abuse its protesters, fails to conduct fair or transparent trials and investigations or allow in the UN's special rapporteur on torture, and employs expensive foreign PR firms to help whitewash its crimes? Does our government have no shame?

 

 

Tags: Bahrain  Arms  Arab Spring  human rights

26 comments

Funny Man's picture

It amazes me how from an article which talks about our direct/ indirect support for a traitorous and torturous Kingdom some commenters only conclude with an "are you calling us animals" view… which for some reason seems to trigger the patriotism card.

I think regardless of whether the country or its occupants were Muslim, Christian, Jewish, Atheists etc, the very fact that we are more than happy to support such a country knowingly ignoring/ evading how the people are abused, tortured and controlled is a little disappointing... but expected.

We'd all love to to think we were better than that (some actually do) but it seems as "humanitarian" and "peaceful" as we like to think we are.. Were really not **shock**.

At the end of the day we are just supporting our own interests. We really don't care if it's at the expense of others. The only time it becomes a problem is when we are not benefiting. Then those very same people become abusive, disgusting and downright evil dictators who must be stopped **obviously** because were caring like that.

Bahrain is a strategic ally for operations in the middle east to help thwart from what I understand "the evil people there" **sarcasm** yet we are more than happy to hold hands with those autocratic, oppressive leaders WHOM WE CONTROL.

So yes, interesting read, and although I wouldn’t say it was pointless, arguably it is useless. I mean since when has out government actually listened to us and not gone to war, or not traded with dictators lol :)

Bobby the Shoe's picture

Dear Agoodwood,

I think Mehdi Hasan basically agrees with Mark Steyn: Steyn asks the question "Is there a Muslim country in which you would want to live ?"

Hasan chooses to live among the Kuffar, instead of living with his fellow Muslims in, say, Tunisia or Saudi Arabia.

I should say that Mark Steyn will be appearing on Australian TV's Q and A next week. This is on the ABC and is available on their website.

So...........I encourage you to tune in next Tuesday or thereafter. Mark Steyn is an "Islamophobic" hero. I love him to smithereens.

That will be all

Bobby the Shoe

P.S. I would still like somebody to answer this question: What would happen to a Tory backbencher who said...

"Muslims live like animals" ?????

Would that be acceptable ?

stevem1's picture

It takes guts to post here when you are semi literate. I have tried several times to make sense of the first post by Agoodword. To return to the article by Mehdi Hassan. Why arent the ongoing crimes in Bahrain filling our TV screens every evening ? Why the selective outrage? Is it because the US bases it's 5th Fleet in Bahrain?

Agoodword's picture

Stevem your not the first and nor will you be the last who finds it difficult to understand much deeper philosophical issues. Many greater mind than yours find enlightenment after decades of striving. Keep at it. My only mistake was thinking the average reader here was well versed in more than one decipline.

On your other point I can't agree more. We like to think our governments are motivated by moral conscience but that's more to do with feeling good about ourselves.

Agoodword's picture

Bobby the shoe don't demean yourself by taking mark as your hero. Calling mark a hero only devalues the currency of a hero. The Syrian men women and children fighting the ASAd regime knowing they might die are heroes.

Heard the guy many times, nothing but a charlatan and hate monger. You can't see this of course, your all star struck.

Linda's picture

I wrote to my MP, Penny Mordaunt, about the arms situation. She is a member of the Committees on Arms Export Controls, as the Committees are currently conducting a parliamentary enquiry into recent arms export licencing policy, and so she's in an important position.
Her response to me was inadequate.
Letter from my MP about UK's arms trade with Bahrain... http://aspeninfo.blogspot.com/2012/02/blog-post.html?spref=tw

The government's response hasn't addressed the fundamental problem - which is how it came to be supplying repressive regimes with the tools of repression in the first place. Revoking licences does not solve the problem: these licences should never have been granted.
Since then, nothing fundamental has changed in either government policy or practice: as soon as media attention moved on, it returned to business as usual. It is still allowing arms to be sold to countries such as Bahrain, where repression is ongoing, and it continues to seek new deals with such countries. Promoting arms sales to repressive regimes is completely incompatible with supporting human rights in these countries.

Bobby the Shoe's picture

To Agoodword,

Mark Steyn is an intellectual giant. A hero, let there be no doubt.

This is a man who stands up for the Britsh Empire, for western liberalism AND against crazy Islamic paraphernalia such as the Hijab.

Mark Steyn is a wonderfully talented writer. As I wrote above, be sure to watch him on next week's "Q and A". It's on the ABC in Australia. Worth watching.

When Western Civilisation sinks into the sand, we will realise that we were wrong to dismiss the warnings from people like Mark Steyn and Mad Mel Phillips.

Bobby the Shoe

Alison Gross's picture

Sorry for the pathetic response but...

"Does our government have no shame?"

Na...of course not

Agoodword's picture

Western civilisation will fall, and I say that with some trepidation. But why blame Muslims. Civilisations come and go, they transform and mutate. It's the way of the world to fight it is a loosing battle.

The problem with steyn is that the natural flow of history with its many interruptions is blamed on an external enemy, muslims. Why doesnt he blame the west.

He is no different than the muslim who blame the west for all their problems when the truth is far closer to home, muslims themselves.

Stayn is a scaremonger. Others, far more intelligent have analysed the flow of history without the same demagoguery

Des Demona's picture

Bahrainphobia surely!

http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/mehdi-hasan/2010/12/world-cup-2022-qat...
Give Bahrain the next world cup and all will be well.

Marion's picture

The double standards of the British government when it comes to Bahrain and Saudi Arabia are plain for all to see. The BBC has simply ignored the military clampdown going on in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia and chosen instead to wheel out high minded journalists(self appointed I might add) such as John Simpson and Jim Muir to trot out the usual anti Assad invectives.

charlesfrith's picture

When is the New Statesman going to pick an issue and stick to it?

Bobby the Shoe's picture

Do Muslims live like animals ??

That is the question.

quattro man's picture

Mehdi you need to get out more and find more interesting things to cut and paste from.

Bobby the Shoe's picture

Why should we care about the people / cattle in Bahrain ?

They live like animals, don't they ????

What's the point of bombing the Muslims of Bahrain back to the Stone Age when they already live in it ?!?!

BRING ON THE ISLAMIC REVOLUTION !!

Bobby the Shoe

Agoodword's picture

@Bobby the Shoe,

People/ cattle

bombing/ stone age

extremely contemptuous view of your fellow men.

just wear a turban and you'd fit right into the cult of suicide.

Romana's picture

@Booby the Shoe,
Oh Dear!!
Bombing them all, really thats all you can say?
Why did you bother!!!

Julia Harris's picture

Bahrain is no better or worse than any other Arab/Muslims state in that they all have terrible Human rights records.

Its funny that Mehdi chooses to quote from human rights watch, maybe he should take his cue's from them regarding Israel...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9qfuzkZdZg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhWgZu6tcZU

Agoodword's picture

Bobby the sand yes methaphorically some Muslims do just like some from other human groups.

You really should expand your reading list I mean mark steyn your hero no wonder you can't get past first base. Rigid minds find it hard reconciling what appears to be conflicting.

Bobby the Shoe's picture

Dear Romana - I am saying that we should NOT bomb the people / cattle of Bahrain back to the Stone Age. It would be a BAD idea.

Dear Agoodword - it is the author of this piece who sees his fellow man as contemptible. He sees the rest of us as animals.

It is Mehdi Hasan who has abhorrent views.

Bobby the Shoe

Jan Ryan's picture

You've said it all. These fools pay tens of millions to PR companies to make them look good. Why don't they just start behaving like an ethical government? A hell of a lot cheaper and everyone, including them, wins. They are caught up in their own spin.

Buckskins's picture

Why pick on Bahrain? Every Arab country is doing the same or worse. The Saudis are the worst of all.

Agoodword's picture

Dear Bobby the Shoe,

Mehdi also believes, God honored the children of Adam and God breathed his spirit into Men.

You cannot take statements that are specific in their intent to a general level.

Just as sentences follow grammatical rules human discourse must be understood through rules.

Not trying to get complicated or make excuses for Mehdi, but I believe we have to try harder to understand the intent of why people say what they say if we say we are sincere.

If sincerity and the pursuit of truth is not a value you hold to high esteem than I guess all what I’m saying is rubbish and you can stop reading my post.

But if you take them seriously then you have to agree that sometimes the most innocuous statements can be taken out of context. Take what Broness tonge said today, a storm in tea cup.

you'll also agree that biologically, we humans are animals to argue otherwise is to impose an interpretive process that takes man out of the animal kingdom and turns him into another being, a human.

The interpretive process is an ideology it has no connection to the physical world. whether you call it religion or humanism its all the same.

Each and every one of these ideologies hold the proposition that human beings that have no respect for moral and ethical codes, abide by no progressive values and behave contrary to the lofty ideals and moral virtues humans are capable of are living a sub human life. Unless humans live by a code outside their physical necessities they are metaphorically living the life of an animal.
This is a very specific exhortation from the Isalmic value system, and exists within a discourse that tries to encourage humans to reach their full potential. It doesn’t mean that their failure to do so nullifies the fact of their en-nobleness and sanctity on a general level.

To read anything more into such a random statement which he has tried to explain countless times is a gross misunderstanding.

Then again Mehdi is a closet extremist, you might say, who is forced by his faith to hide his true motives.

But have you stopped to consider the innumerable explicit statements about his position on this as opposed to one ambiguous video taken out of its proper context and discourse.

Anthony's picture

Mehdi you got a face i just wanna slap the shit out of ! Would love to meet you in the street so i can give you the opportunity to tell me to my face that i live like an animal.

Agoodword's picture

Anthony, you sure you'r ok. I'm surprised you made it here to vent so much hate and anger.

sounds like you're irked more by the fact that someone who is supposed to be racially and religiously inferior to you is more articulate and more intelligent than you could ever hope to be. And he has a job in respectable journal unlike you.

I mean no rational person would actually react to a short video in that way. no rational person could muster so much hate over such a thing, unless of course you have a certain disdain already in your mental DNA.

If i really hated someone and i knew there was no way to do anything, id stop hating them, becasue the hate itself saps your mind and energy. If you hate him so much is he really worth your attention.

i feel sorry for you man, i know you dont want me to feel sorry, but i do, i cant help it cos you are so so gone.

Anthony's picture

@Agoodword you got a face i just wanna slap the shit out of too .

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets