Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

Mehdi Hasan

Mehdi Hasan’s polemical take on politics, economics and foreign affairs

Syndicate contentRSS

The war on welfare scroungers, part 94

Jobcentres are "tricking" people out of benefits to cut costs, says whistleblower.

He says that he will watch the banks "like a hawk" but allows bankers to walk away with taxpayer-funded, multimillion-pound bonuses. He says he cares about the poor but cracks down on welfare claimants. Such is our Prime Minister, David Cameron, the "compassionate Conservative".

In Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday, Cameron said:

Far too much in our system is lost from fraud and error and I do not think that taxpayers go to work and work hard in order to fund benefits to which people are not entitled.

Yet, as I noted on Twitter at the time, tax evasion costs the UK exchequer more than 15 times as much as benefit fraud. Why do we not hear the PM condemning tax evasion with the same vigour and regularity with which he raises the subject of benefit fraud? Instead, Cameron kicked off PMQs by condemning and defaming the anti-tax-evasion group, UK Uncut.

The coalition's "war on welfare scroungers", however, continues unabated. Here is a shocking story from today's Guardian:

Rising numbers of vulnerable jobseekers are being tricked into losing benefits amid growing pressure to meet welfare targets, a Jobcentre Plus adviser has told the Guardian.

A whistleblower said staff at his jobcentre were given targets of three people a week to refer for sanctions, where benefits are removed for up to six months. He said it was part of a "culture change" since last summer that had led to competition between advisers, teams and regional offices.

"Suddenly you're not helping somebody into sustainable employment, which is what you're employed to do," he said. "You're looking for ways to trick your customers into 'not looking for work'. You come up with many ways. I've seen dyslexic customers given written job searches and when they don't produce them -- what a surprise -- they're sanctioned. The only target that anyone seems to care about is stopping people's money.

"'Saving the public purse' is the catchphrase that is used in our office . . . It is drummed home all the time -- you're saving the public purse. Feel good about stopping someone's money, you've just saved your own pocket. Its a joke."

The claims came as the big businesses handed contracts to get the long-term jobless into work today said the government should privatise jobcentres so that their firms could work with people who have been jobless for less than a year.

Statistics from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) show the total number of cases where people have lost their benefits has soared since the beginning of 2010 to 75,000 in October, the latest month available. The figures also reveal the number of claimants with registered disabilities being cut off has more than doubled to almost 20,000 over the same period.

This follows a change in the rules in April last year where sanctions were extended to claimants who were late for jobcentre interviews and other less serious offences.

So much for the "morality" and "Christian ethics" of the Work and Pensions Secretary, Iain Duncan Smith. This is a callous and cruel coalition government, engaged in a war on not just welfare "scroungers" but on the poorest and most vulnerable members of our society.

Tags: Tax  Iain Duncan Smith  unemployment  bankers  David Cameron

112 comments

JB's picture

Sorry, Luddite but did you lose your humanity along the way? You must have read some of these comments,particularly from those working at Jobcentres and have realised by now that this is deliberate and savage attack on those who are least able to defend themselves? We're all going to see a far more unjust and inhuman society if these policies keep on going. I'm absolutely not being sarcastic here, but I hope you manage to find your humanity again.

Imposter Pope's picture

And in this environment, Tory millionaires accuse benefit recipients of living in luxury. David, Baron Freud (The World At One BBC Radio 4, April 1st 2011) seems obsessed with Housing Benefit recipients being regarded as having a better quality of life than those not in receipt of Housing Benefit, who, say, live in an owner-occupied property. It must have slipped the notice of the Conservatives that being on Housing Benefit is to be in a de facto low-income or no-income position in the first place. And where are all these Palladian state-funded Bridesheads? In our inner cities? This position rather undermines itself by ignoring the fact that those who own property obviously have a significant economic advantage over those who do not. In light of this oversight, maybe Lord Freud would like to swap places with a Housing Benefit recipient who lives in a rented flat in the private sector, like me?

The LibDems have been pretty quiet on this one so far, but I suggest that the economic elite Freud, Osborne, Cameron, et al once more have no idea what they are talking about. In the past, a tried and tested method was to make a documentary where some Tory scapegoat was sent off to a Council Estate for a week, and then came back and recanted their pompous old ways to camera, whilst the party carried on regardless in the reflected media glory of the moment. Spare us this, but why is it OK for the Tory millionaires to live in luxury, whilst millions of working people are spoken to and treated with derision?

Unless the whole thing was just a massive April Fool?

Mr. Divine's picture

Actually I've been out in my back paddock 3 or 4 times a week ever since I bought a compound bow. Do you know what these are? Very high powered crossbows with pulley systems. You have to pull the string back with a lot of strength but at the end it loosens. The arrows are near bullet speed. Its frightening and some of my friends wont even shoot it.

The 'feeling' of the bow gives you a sort of power that you display in other things. It is most noticeable when I play table tennis and golf. You get into arrow shooting mode and you're really focused and powerful.

The problem with you Nick is that you don't believe I am the First Seal. And you just write me off as another mentally disturbed person.. how discriminatory!

You are the sort of person I need on my communal housing project, driving it through committee and speaking to members of the upper reaches of the Labour Party. Instead you write me off because I give you a bit of jibe.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/tbr/tbr026.htm

Wrensense's picture

Sad very sad.......

Nick9's picture

Mr D: Perhaps we could see a picture of you down there in Australia with your kangaroo chums, or would that be a tad difficult; - given that you're somewhat closer to home? You really should get rid of that bitter twist; - surely you're still not letting all of those psycho nurses get to you?

Luddite's picture

'Jobcentre Plus adviser has told the Guardian' you shouldn't believe everything you read in the Guardian. A Jobcentre manager told me, she is enjoying forcing the long-term idle back into the world of work. So she can spend more time and give more support to the genuine job seeker. Mr Hasan, what do you know about christian ethics, and do you still think non-muslims live their lives like aminals?

Lou's picture

Now I know why I stopped bothering with NS. Catch you on mylegal some time Nick.

Mr. Divine's picture

@Nick: Other people have already realised I am the First Seal because when they converse with me 'strange' coincidences start happening. At first they write if off but they are intrigued as to how this is happening. And so they come once more to the blog site to find out how this could be the case. It defies all known logic. How can my words coincide with similar things in your life?

Mr. Divine's picture

@Nick: I bet you are dying for a picture of me! Just because you gotta yourself out of the closet then you reckon who is next?

I didn't spot no wedding ring and I detected a certain tone in the voice that you haven't come out of all the closets. Actually Nick, I have sent my photo to Laurie Penny: and HarpyMarx (Louise) and Anna Chen know what I look like. Perhaps they have kept my photo, perhaps not. How close are you to them. Remember who I am, for I only come once in a millipedian.

The thing about being The First Seal is that I have to be true to my Muslim followers and not reveal my image. You know how it is with us First Seals.

mike cobley's picture

Read the full piece over at the Guardian, and I'm find myself both angry and horrified. Angry because this policy can only increase desperation, poverty and squalor, in short add to the sum total of human misery. Horrified because in order for unjust sanctions to be applied, Jobcentre employees will have to behave like heartless, dead-eyed automata. There's only one thing worse than carrying out sadistic acts against the weak and the defenceless - and that's making good people carry out sadistic acts against the weak and the defenceless.

And where is Nick Clegg in all of this? In what way has he gentled the brutal hand of Conservatism? Not in any way that I see.

Luddite's picture

Nick!! House prices shot-up, but many building material actually fell, and unit Labour costs remained static. Labour should of built affordable properties for working families, but didn't. Because of Labour's love-affair with high-finance, social mobility for working-folks stopped, all this under a Labour government and you wonder why you are in-opposition. It's called betrayal.

Mr. Divine's picture

Nick: why don't you ask one of your NS ex-workers if my IP address is from Australia?

mike cobley's picture

Luddite - are you purposefully blinkered, or are you just reporting in from another planet? Hmmm, lemme see - long-term idle, christian ethics....by jove, I do believe you're from DailymailWorld! Do I win my free taser?

I B Scounger's picture

This doesn't surprise me one bit. And, sadly, most civil servants will obey the orders to do this. It would take a very brave man or woman to take a stand on this and refuse to obey orders.

It's all very well for union leaders calling on us all to oppose the cuts, but when their members are carrying out instructions to make life misery for those unfortunate to be unemployed or, like me, sufficiently ill to be unable to work, then it will be understood why quite a few claimants might show little sympathy when, say, a dole clerk loses his job.

The whole procedure in respect of claiming sick pay is degrading and demoralising; one is considered as a workshy malingerer unless one can prove otherwise. And getting proof that the Department will accept is a long, hard process, especially if, like me, one has an exhausting, long-term, incurable illness.

I was a civil servant, I was active in my union, and voted for Mark Serwotka in elections. It hurts me to think that members of that union are part of a machine that make my life difficult. I support the anti-cuts campaigns. But unless these campaigns go further than merely opposing government policy in respect of cuts and start to address the role of civil servants in implementing nasty government policies, then any anti-cuts campaign will be unable to unite workers and claimants in a fight for genuine social justice.

Martin L's picture

Hi Nick, I'm fine thanks, just been working really hard.

I know burnley quite well. It has got lots of problems, but so has London. I suspect that you are right - when these houses are seen as bargains, they will be snapped up. The trouble is that if these properties are let out these areas will remain slums. What we need is for owner occupiers to show pride in these properties, then the whole area will improve.

My point is that realistically, most low income families will NEVER be able to buy in London, but if they moved North they would get on the ladder. Over time northern prices would rise, and southern prices would fall -only trouble is that few want to venture oop north. Sad really......

Mr. Divine's picture

Oh come on Lou, you're a road sweeper. Stop pretending you're a lawyer.

Mr. Divine's picture

Nick they are being sold for that in some places in the States. Downtown Detroit: 'unemployed' people have got some money and bought their place for less than $2000 in some places! It's possible that some places in the UK may end up like that. But what's wrong with owning your own house for only $2,000. It's got to be a good thing. A house can be 40% of the household budget. It's a huge saving.

You see Nick I want to get people off welfare and allow them to be financially free from welfare, to put them beyond the need for welfare. I want people to be free from welfare.

Chris's picture

Yup, kick 'em when they're down. Treating people this way will have the added benefit of scaring those who have got a job to toe the line too. "Christian ethics" just means cracking down hard on anyone who doesn't conform. It's got nothing to do with compassion and empathy or helping the most vulnerable, and everything to do with punishing them for being in this position. And how dare poor people expect money for nothing!

Mr. Divine's picture

Actually Burnley is high on my investment lists. I used to live in Mixenden, Halifax and walk to Burnley on the weekends across the Moors. It was fantastic. Winter is best.

I hope the house prices fall further in these parts as I intend to return and walk for days on end like I used to. The lower the house prices the better.

Anton Jury's picture

This is not The Nasty Party it is The Evil Party !

Mr. Divine's picture

These houses in Burnley are ideal to set up a communal housing project especially if you can get about 15 of them in a separate area because they are so cheap. You just convert them into ecologically efficient housing.

Why isn't any government body doing this?

Why am I the only person behind this project?

Is it because I'm a LUNATIC?

Mark Lancaster's picture

Fact; if you are in government and you screw up the finances then the most vulnerable will suffer. I have seen 3 Labour Governments in my life time and on each occasion they have left power with the economy in a mess. Well done Labour!
Under Labour tax avoidance by a few ultra high earners became an art form. They even gave knighthoods and perrages to the best tax avoiders. Well done Labour!
Fact; one of the most common ways to avoid tax is to buy Treasury Bonds. your interest is more secure and higher than us ordinary folk can find on the high street. When governments spend too much they have to issue bonds thus increasing the chances of the ultra rich to invest their money and avoid tax on the interest. Well done Labour!
Fact; the taxpayer is responsible for the interest on these bonds; therefore a large proportion of the tax you pay goes directly into the pockets of the ultra rich. Well done Labour.
Fact; Labour lost grip on the banking sector. They sucked up to the bankers, awarded them honours and generally kissed arse. When the banks collapsed their own fiscal incompetence was woefully exposed to the cost of the most vulnerable. Now they have the nerve to blame the banks and the coalition for what happened on their watch.
What is happening now in the economy is all directly the fault of the last miserable Labour Government.
A proper understanding of the mess the economy was left in will tell any neutral observer that drastic cuts are inevitable. Labour have for the third time in my life left power and left the most vulnerable to suffer the consequences of their mismanagement.
Do not be fooled by Labour politicians crowing about the coalition from the comfort of opposition. NEVER VOTE LABOUR AGAIN!
It is ALL their fault.
P.S. Vote for anyone else, I don't have an opinion in that direction, I just understand the money and how to add up and subtract!

Mr. Divine's picture

Martin L: You know that the price and structure of housing is the key to the style of life. You know that country living is very different from the usual street. And you know that it is possible that if you reduced 'living' costs to a low level people can save and invest and be free from the demands of a full-time job. It just requires the right circumstances. Communal housing projects are the way. The communities are there to make money, to be free from work.

Imposter Pope's picture

Still no content on here about the Tory's Housing Benefit 'reforms', and let's face it, having somewhere to live is pretty important. There is a moral imperative here to talk about this. Millionaire Tory grandees have this week accused HB recipients of living in luxury. This is inexcusable and needs to be broadcast. 'Welfare scroungers' are a tiny minority and do not constitute reason to remove welfare from those who need or deserve it. Editors, please address this issue, or you will lose (more) credibility

Idespisedavidcameron's picture

Luddite- Why do you read it & post here? I can only assume that you want to anger people. How very sad.

Martin L's picture

wrong nick, 2 bed houses (terrace) go for 22 to 30K in certain areas of north west ie burnley.

That said, why should taxpayers spend 3 grand a week paying rent on some london pad?

Martin L's picture

for the record, I'm all for tackling tas evasion (not avoidance), but saying that we should avoid the welfare bill because of tax issues sounds like;

child in playground to teacher "Why are you getting on at me for hitting toby, Louise hit hit John earlier, why don't you sort her out instead!"

The point is that both issues should be sorted out!

Luddite's picture

When i hear Milliband talk about the squeezed middle and folks on 50k+ suffering, my eyes roll. You don't help people by doing for them that they should do for themselves neither do you help folks by pitying them.

Nick's picture

Agreed the Housing Benefit reforms do need a mention as do the whole raft of benefit related changes. How much for instance was said about lowering the winter fuel allowance for pensioners? and the difficulty caused by this Government's wilful refusual to keep in place some of the highly effective anti - recessionary measures aimed at reducing a wave of repossessions? not to mention de-regulation allowing landlords to do what they want with their tenants.

Not forgetting of course this Government's asbolute intention to ensure access to advice is no longer available for people seeking help.

Luddite's picture

Chris "Christian ethics" just means cracking down hard on anyone who doesn't conform. No it doesn't. The labour movement was born from Christian ethics!! knob-head.

C Baker's picture

My advice to benefit claimants. Be like the bankers. Take.....

If JSA fails you. Claim income support. That way you don't have to sign on in such earnest.
You know those dodgy people that hire office space and some stationery from the pound shop and get paid thousands to train you. (They do give you a good pavement for smokers fag butts though). Labour's back to work scheme. You don't get a job, they do nothing- but you both dupe the governent- great! Anybody who has been in to a job centre in the last 5 years (not the new statesmen or guardian journalists). (They are in it together with Cameron and Balls- ok yah)!!The Daily mail is a real source of insprirational news for them).

Job centres - Fab- aren't they? People? No there aren't any. None of those old fashoined local people who could find you a job. Labour outsourced that to a telephone. Sorry disabled, blind, old, etc- use a phone and a person on the other end can tell you that 150 miles from where you live there are 3 hours of work going for a sewing machinist. On your bike folks!! Tel the family- you're employed!!

My advice. Get a mortgage on your council home. Try Nothern rock perhaps. Central London. Interest only. Unemployed? State will pay. Try 1 million over ten years interest only. The state have to pay the interest on your mortgage when you are unemployed. After 10 years your 1 million pound home paid for in full, still don't have to pay student loan and the public and private sector workers get a wage cut to pay for you and the bankers.

The squeezed middle- stupid- working to pay for others. Go on benefits or become a banker.

Bankers- sell something - person no chance of paying back- still sell- take arrangement fee- move on- do same again. Has to stop? Get in auditors- really well known accountantcy firms- they say all is fine- they get paid- you get paid- crash- tax payer bailout.

dupe the social legally- get millions- money runs out- tax payer bailout!

Moral of this story- don't work or pay tax!!

I'm happy. Enjoy paying tax menials!

Jo's picture

Can someone please confirm that these sanctions were introduced by this government please? This seems to refer to them being introduced last April (2010). Many thanks

petroleum's picture

To any 'normal' person out there, I really would'nt take much notice of any politician whatsoever. They may as well as be living on Mars for the good that they are.

It is 'wrong' to imply or assume that all people on 'jobseekers allowance' are scroungers. This is a massive generalisation about a very large group of people in society. Granted there are those who have no sincere intention of finding work, but there are also those that have every positive intention/s.

Thirteen years ago, I was on 'jobseekers' for five months and there is a definite stigma attached to it because of the underlying 'SCROUNGER' element. Many people who negatively comment on those receiving Jobseekers Allowance - would be wise to remember that as individuals we are all different, with different circumstances, different requirements, different 'types' of work we are suited too. It stands to reason that not everyone is going to have the same kind of short-term success in finding a job or a job more suited to their talents.

As I see it, the problem with the political elite in most countries boils down to the fact that they are afforded the luxury of professing 'virtue' as opposed to living it. Generally speaking, the wealthier you are, the greater the level of ignorance!

bparker170's picture

A banker, a Daily Mail reader and a benefit

claimant are sitting at a table sharing

12 biscuits.
...
The banker takes 11 and says to the

Daily Mail reader:

"Watch out for the benefit claimant,

he wants your biscuit".

Mr. Divine's picture

Roll on the repossessions: that's a good thing for the people of the Repossession Land. Price of houses fall and so people can more easily pay off their mortgage: an important first step to independence and communistic living.

Nick, are you concerned that because you bought near the height of the property bubble your investment will fall in value? Isn't that why you're concerned about the repossessions?

Mr. Divine's picture

@Mehdi: 'This is a callous and cruel coalition government, engaged in a war on not just welfare "scroungers" but on the poorest and most vulnerable members of our society.'

But surely it is a good thing that there are less people on welfare payments. Come on, be truthful, there is bound to be some people on disabilities who are trying it on. It's human nature and if you're from where I'm from, well, it's fair game.

There's nothing wrong with making sure the system isn't being abused. It wasn't there to be abused, it was there to be used for genuine illness and disability.

Be careful who you are supporting. And what system you are encouraging to happen. You can't just say 'Tory' = bad. Why don't you change your ideas from this left norm?

Nick9's picture

Mr D. My concern over repossessions is purely and simply out of concern for those I help. I cannot see that there is an ounce of logic in your argument over forcing repossessions. It induces stress for many and usually creates a situation where people end up owing more than their homes are worth (as arrears/costs accrue). So not only does the person end up losing their home - they end up with debt as well.

Becoming homeless means people need a new home. Where prey is the sense in throwing a person out of one home only for another one to be found?

A lot of the people who will end up homeless will be put in that position for no fault of their own. After working hard for the best part of lives, people are now finding themselves subject to redundancy (with pitifully low capped settlements) going from employed/housed to unemployed/homeless - it's madness to fuel this in any economy.

The only ones to sweep up will be those who have the cash - they'll snap up and rent out ex-repossessed properties whilst enjoying de-regulated tenancies (creating a wave of rogue landlords). As soon as prices rise they will kick out their tenants to capitalise on the increase in value.

And as for your own insight into my reasons for concern - some of us are concerned for people other than ourselves - it's called humanity. A commodity this useless and heartless government is sadly lacking.

Freeman2's picture

I always like to read Luddite's comments. It's a useful reminder of why trade unions were formed and the idea of socialism developed.

Nick9's picture

Oh and Mr D. It's not Tory = Bad. It's Tory = Disastrous!

Dark Heart of Toryland's picture

Yet again, this demonstrates the absurdity of having a cabinet composed largely of over-privileged born-to-wealth millionaires. Many of Cameron's circle work in the finance sector, and bankers are a class of people with whom he is socially at ease. He is therefore naturally inclined to empathise with them. On the other hand, he has probably never met any benefit claimants, except in his MP's surgery, or on the campaign trail. Cameron, Osborne and Clegg simply have no conception of what it is like not to be completely financially secure for life. They have had absolutely no experience of having to depend on the state for their welfare.

Slow Boy's picture

Do you all have any idea how terrifying this is for people like me? I mean I've got the Learning Disability Partnership to look after me and my 'critical' support needs and I'm still scared about loosing my benefits and my home. None of us are safe.

A nobody's picture

Agrees with slow boy this is LIFE for disabled poeple - they are removing everything from us and then |ATOS get extra payouts for suddenly saying we are well - But there is NO CURE for what i have how come in a 10min button pressing thing where you dont even look into my eyes or ask me how i FEEL or how much PAIN i am in - can you dem me suddenly cured?

Cameron is a sick sick man and a LIAR to boot - he used DLA for his son but now he reckons we are all fraudsters and wont say how DLA fraud is only 0.5% - now i bet MP fraud isnt that low or tax fraud or any other fraud at all!

Keri's picture

Black Block

Barbs's picture

This is disgraceful what is going on and I have heard about this from an inside source before it came out in the mainstream media. Most of the DWP people think its disgusting. Please read the Guardian about targets being set for how many people are sanctioned so once again its not about tackling people who are not looking for work but getting a set number of people off benefits per week. As the article states - no new back to work or training has been set up. DWP workers are targetting the most vulnerable to sanction as that makes reaching their targets easier. If you have neighbours that are on JSA especially if they are sick or disabled please check that they are not starving to death with no money coming in. With the harsher tests on the sick and disabled many really vulnerable people may soon be having benefits stopped. People with cancer, MS, Lupus, Muscular Dystrophy etc. etc. have been put on JSA or in the Work Related Activity Group of ESA which means that they still have to conform to the things set by DWP. People who are sick and disabled have been sanctioned for being sick - too ill too attend for an interview then lose their benefits. In this Big Society - check your neighbours are ok and have enough to eat.

hindle-a's picture

So immersed in corruption and misanthropy are they ,uncivilised in every way-they rely on the population to have the same attributes.Through lies and distortions, repeated ad infinitum they seek to persuade people it is a sin to be low-paid,disabled,unemployed,ill or have Caring responsibilities and dare to receive entitlements-people who do not flinch at extracting from the State hundreds of pounds for one taxi-fare and happily remove DLA mobility from residents in a home

Clem the Gem's picture

Last year I spent 3 months looking for a job. Previously, I had been in employments continuously since 1992. Funnily enough I paid tax on my wages. I received nothing whatsoever from the state, and had to live on a couch at my girlfriends house. Interesting to note that when you essentially qualify for state support, the policy is to swindle you out of it. Unless you are a banker. Or Fred Goodwin, (who obviously isn't a banker, for legal reasons).
http://clemthegem.wordpress.com

Ian5's picture

"Far too much in our system is lost from fraud " too right Mr Cameron, and you should know being a member of the most statistically fraudulent group in our society, Currently there is 1 person in prison in the UK for every 635 citizens, these for assorted offences. There are currently 3 MP's from the former parliament in prison for expenses fraud out of 650 MP's, plus those that paid back. That makes them by far the most fraudulent UK grouping.. Oh and I worked hard in part to pay NI contributions, so that if/when sick or unemployed I had cover.

Lou's picture

A point was made earlier about crisis loans. Some of you who may need such a service might not realise as for some reason it seems to have escaped the attention of MPs, think tanks, charities and the media, that crisis loan payments were stopped on 4th April and will not be re-introduced until 2013. As I said before, pray your home isn't flooded, destroyed in a fire or your washer or cooker does not pack up over the next four years. When it is bought back in, it will be run by the local authority and not the DWP, in other words your local council will have to make provisions for loans out of it's budget.

I'm a person will lupus, arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and an allergy to sunlight. I have neurological damage, am in constant pain, often on morphine and struggle every day.
I'm expecting to be passed fit for work by some ATOS style gestapo.

I want to work but where's the job for people like me who can't commit to anything regular and can be best described as unreliable? Where is the future employer who thinks I'd be an asset for their company and ignores my health record and time off record? Where are the employers prepared to adapt their work place to meet my illness needs? Where's the employer who will allow me to stand up every five minutes or so, leave my job, move around a while or let me lie down til the worst of the pain subsides? Where is the employer who won't mind that my fatigue makes me fall asleep at the desk, the machine or whatever? Where's the employer who is willing to let me work at home April through til October when the sunlight really makes my life impossible and who will adapt their office with black out blinds, remove all fluorescent lighting for the period November through to March?

David Cameron talks much of understanding disability and how hard it is. I will take no lectures from a man who, whilst legally entitled to claim DLA, claimed the highest rates of DLA Mobility and Care for his son when he could well afford not to. Most of us ordinary men and women would never claim just because we could a sum that we financially did not need to claim.

Cameron hasn't a leg to stand on morally or ethically. Unfortunately those who his policies are affecting literally haven't got a leg to stand on and aren't millionaires either, for these people it is life and death. How many people will Cameron send to the digitas clinic through his Hitleresque policy of targeting the ill and disabled?

Luddite's picture

Freeman
02 April 2011 at 18:17
I always like to read Luddite's comments. It's a useful reminder of why trade unions were formed and the idea of socialism developed.

21 year's a shop-steward. 6 mouths in Wakefield prison, because of my political activation. Socialism was developed to defend the hard-working not the fucking idle.

matthew fox's picture

I live for the day the Government run ads trying to track down tax cheats.

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets