Mehdi Hasan

Mehdi Hasan’s polemical take on politics, economics and foreign affairs

Syndicate contentRSS

Crazy Republicans prefer strip clubs to mosques

The row over the so-called Ground Zero mosque rumbles on.

From the Huffington Post:

A new survey from the Democratic-affiliated firm Public Policy Polling finds that more Republicans support constructing a strip club than a mosque near Ground Zero.

Just 4 percent of Republican respondents said they support building a mosque two blocks from the site, whereas 21 percent said they would be fine with a strip club. Forty-nine percent of Democrats said they supported the mosque and 33 for the strip club. Among Independents, it was 34 percent for the mosque and 28 percent for the strip club.

Weird, eh? Can the kooky Republicans get any crazier or more Islamophobic? The HuffPo report contains the following quote from Ibrahim Hooper, from the Council on American-Islamic Relations:

This shows the extent and impact of the recent rise in anti-Islam rhetoric in our society that people would rather have some kind of establishment perpetuating immoral behavior over a house of worship [run] by people who are trying to promote morality and ethics and righteous behavior.

Oh, and for those of you haven't been following this story that closely, and might be wondering why pollsters even posed a "mosque v strip club" question, here's some background from the HuffPo report:

During the debate over whether to build a planned Islamic cultural center near the memorial site, many media outlets noted that the "sacred" ground surrounding the area is home to all sorts of less-than-sacred outlets.

"In a walk of the streets within three blocks of Ground Zero, the Daily News counted 17 pizza shops, 18 bank branches, 11 bars, 10 shoe stores and 17 separate salons where a girl can get her lady parts groomed," reported the paper in August. It also pointed to a strip club called "Pussycat Lounge" just two blocks from where the World Trade Center once stood, as well as a place called "Thunder Lingerie".

On a side note, it is worth pointing out that what is being built near Ground Zero by the Cordoba Initiative is not a "mosque", as I made clear in this piece. But why let little things like FACTS get in the way of prejudice, bigotry and fear-mongering?

 

 

 

52 comments

Villan's picture

If the situation were here and not in the US I wonder how many people would favour yet another mosque, which represents an alien religion which is anathema to western values to a strip club? Difficult to make out a case for strip clubs threatening our way of life; less so the proliferation of mosques.

Uncle Sam (esq.)'s picture

Lascivious Vulgarians,

Among the pack of wheedling, braying jack-asses that are this sites regular contributors, there have always been those who seek to tell me how to run my business. Indeed, hardly a day goes by in which this strident horde of mewling, puking harpies offers their unwelcome opinions here on how to ‘right the ship’. Like many successful and wealthy plutocrats, I am sometimes asked by one or another of you god-damned sheep exactly what it is to which I credit my good fortune.

There is one quality I possess in spades which separates me from the misled cattle that is man-kind. But it is neither my low animal cunning, nor my ruth-less attitude. It is not even the fact that I was born into incredible wealth and privilege and raised in a stress-infused and Byzantine family before most of you were but a series of brutish animal impulses in your drunken grandfather’s pants-creases. What makes me a force to be reckoned with is my capacity to feel ever-present, mind-wracking, pants-shitting fear.

In the realm of business, it has been an unparalleled boon. Fear, after all, is at the root of hatred and anger, the two empire-building tools which have spurred me to fill my coffers to a state of absolute, unfettered corpulence. Like all good capitalists, I fear and despise competition and have therefore crushed whatever rivals poke their heads up.

I make a point of motivating every last one of my employees, from the scullery-maid to the previous President, with fear, as well as its constant companion, derision and threats. In fact, I believe that if you begin living your life in fear, you will be a better and more successful citizen. Is that enough of a cogent articulation so that the gaggle of you dullards are able to at least vaguely comprehend the primary point?

Uncle Sam esq. (Republican)

James's picture

Vik you sound like a complete nob-head...

Sam Dale's picture

Re: Council of American- Islamic Relations
Why are strip clubs inherently immoral?
And, why does religion promote morality, ethics and righteous behaviour?
Didn't realise what an judgmental authoritarian you were Mehdi.

Sam Dale's picture

BY the way, I'd prefer a strip club to a mosque anyday - much more fun.

Graham G's picture

Ah that classic tactic of debate, ignore the points made to you and issue an insult. It is no wonder the debate is being won in this country by the right side.

I see what Cameron is saying about Christianity: e.g. The EDL burned a Quran last week, but when a crazy pastor speaking in the name of Christianity threatens to do it, suddenly the world pays attention. It seems to me that the main problem f the media and Islam is that they take the extremists and say 'this is Islam'. Same happened in this case with Christianity.

Anyway, the whole point of the Tabloid newspaers is to create fear as it sells.

Graham G's picture

@Ehtch Tee - first part of last post was aimed at you

EdWelthorpe's picture

I dunno. Even vulgar expression and pleasure is better than sanctimonous repression and fear. Surely?

But then I'm a humanist. Someone just above a crab, but lower than two donkeys.

Left Is Forward's picture

A sane, feminist-friendly, progressive country would have two basic planning rules:
(1) No buildings devoted to dehumanising individuals of a particular sex, race, or social status - banning freak shows and strip clubs
(2) No buildings devoted to brainwashing, indoctrination, patriarchy and moralism - so no churches or mosques

dearchris's picture

Personally, if I had to choose between a mosque and a strip club, I'd be much embarassed ! Obviously, I'll none of those !
Mehdi Hasan should realize that not being a virgin doesn't make you a whore.
Indeed, he proves of religious radicalism, he even contends that the French ban of the face veil isn't in keeping with individual freedom. Has he ever heard of something called secularity ?

A real American.'s picture

Anyone who takes anything the Huffington Post writes is crazy and see little green men from mars. That mosque will NEVER be built. You will see.

vik's picture

The brilliant move made by the backers of the mosque deserves serious discussion. The decision to build a mosque on a deeply sensitive location is only part of the game. It is part of a bigger plan to fracture the American society and to paraphrase a great leader of similar times create "a house divided against itself".

I don't think building the mosque is the purpose here, the end game is precisely the kind of reaction which we are seeing on both sides liberal and conservative i.e extreme polarization of views.

American society has generally found a balance between competing interests precisely because every side to every issue has found terms of compromise which do not threaten its own existence. Second Amendment, Pro-Choice/Life debates all are currently being argued in terms that do not present the possibility of total obliteration of the other side. This is the unique feature of American democracy which is incompatible with radical Islam's rigid philosophy.

How to ensure a situation which polarizes opinion to such an extent that rational discussion is no longer possible in the public arena? Announce the intention of building a mosque on a land tarnished by radical Islam's greatest horror in the country and watch the show.

I think the plan has been made with careful considerations of the the reactions it will produce.
1. Socially Liberal and Secular section will support it.
2. Socially Conservative and Nationalist element will oppose it.
3. But since some socially conservatives also happen to Constitutionalists there will be division on the property rights issue.
4. And since some Socially Liberal are also advocates of government intervention in social matters they may oppose it for broader public interest.
5. Christian religious Right will oppose it and in turn it will be ridiculed as is happening which will further marginalize it and further instigate it.

The list may go on for various interests in the society.

The genius lies in the fact that unless government actively intervenes, the building of the Mosque if commenced will be a protracted affair inviting much scrutiny and heated arguments by all sides for a long time to come and thus has the potential to be blown to a major issue by differing groups as and when it serves their purpose.

Such a strategy will also expose in the international arena the apparent, though not actual, fragility of American unity in matters of religious tolerance for lack of which radical Islam is much criticized.

On one hand if Government intervenes and stops the drama which will surely unfold it gives fodder to those who argue that American Government acts on behalf of special interests and is not neutral.

One the other hand if it does not and the drama goes on it will fracture American society on its core principles: religious freedom and to an extent property rights.

AncientBriton's picture

Religious freedom! Watch this then decide.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-871902797772997781#

Peter DC's picture

as the T-shirt says
"Science can fly men to the Moon
Religion flies men into buildings"
The last thing anyone needs is more religion, we need more secularism.

Luddite's picture

Peter DC. Well said.

AncientBriton's picture

Secularism isn't the answer Peter DC, it's part of the problem.You need an hour and a half to view the video I referred to above. Don't give up if you value freedom of expression. More here:
http://www.ancientbritonpetros.blogspot.com/

shaf's picture

Bravo, bravo!!!!! John Bennett, I couldn’t agree with you more, so true and poignant. And that's me a muslim (without a capital "M" by the way). I do think Mr Mehdi tries very hard at every given opportunity to justify a defunct ideology that stopped reasoning even with the reasonable world a very long time ago.

jie4v7i14's picture

nothing wrong with strip clubs, ask Frank Skinner, maybe...

Cameron's picture

Why do you always write only about Islam and Islamophobia? Islampaphobia is real and it is an issue, but I would argue Christianity is equally demonised (not cultural Christianity but 'religious Christianity').

I thought you were a political editor. It seems like you are actually the NS Islamic correspondent. Should we also have a Hindu, a Buddhist, a Jewish and a Christian correspondent? Your coverage is disproportionate and it is hard to argue by counting your posts that you do not have your own agenda.

Cowboy's picture

Strippers didn't kill 3,000 Americans on 9/11.

Strip joints don't have lectures to conquer or kill non-strippers.

Cowboy's picture

"On a side note, it is worth pointing out that what is being built near Ground Zero by the Cordoba Initiative is not a "mosque", as I made clear in this piece."

Well then, freedom of religion and your false rant about morality of mosque vs strip club really aren't relevant, are they?

Ali Gul's picture

I just watched you in a program on bbc. The simple answer to the France and veil problem is if the Muslims are having so much problems then why the fuck they leave France and live in any Islamic country happily ever after. That is pretty simple. I am from Pakistan and i am brought up in a strict Islamic environment. every female in my family hates the veil and they dont want to wear it. Yes, we muslims hate the veil. You dont have any manners nor you and that woman sitting with you made any sense, all you both did is to irritate the viewers and display the wrong image of muslims. you my dear friend is one of the few who moved to these countries for a better future and now instead of being helpful to that system and country you are damaging it. shame on you. The thing that i am telling you is pretty logical, move to saudi arabia or some other islamic country there you all can live very happily with the shaikhs,lets see how much security and benefits muslims get there. You are all pretentious and hypocrites.

Mam Tor's picture

Isn't all this latter day religious sanctimoniousness just a little childish?

brad evans's picture

The Mosque (or Cultural Center or Diversity Mall)will pay much less in taxes than a strip joint, besides being much less popular and much more controversial.
"Bigotry, prejudice and fear-mongering"? No, I just don't like being influenced or colonised by poor, inefficient and corrupt cultures. It's bad enough we had millions of guineas, wops, greasers and pollacks, but at least they were non-ideological criminals and cretins.

brad evans's picture

Since when is a group saying that women should be covered up "preaching moral behavior"? Isn't the US sexually repressed enough to begin with? At least with our original Puritans you could get something to drink and a ham sandwich, something you can't say with these people.

jie4v7i14's picture

Cameron - to bring the debate to paeples faces more? rather than stuff their heads in the sand as some do, maily litlle england south eastern oathetic torries. The rest rest of the country embrarassess them in tgheir world broadmindedness.

I am watching european rugby at the moment involving brit teams - have you ever thought in your imagination to do the sam thing?

Shane Williams has just scored a try, but I suspect it is lost on you, Cameron. Jeez!

Stuart Eels's picture

Oh Ehtch Tee, you are soo cruel but I still love you.

Osman's picture

@Cameron

What makes you think that Mehdi only writes about Islam? Take a look at his blog page here and you will find that he actually writes about a lot of other things as well: http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/mehdi-hasan/

Eric Priezkalns's picture

@ James

On the contrary, I think you need to review Mehdi's use of English. I comprehended it, without allowing my political opinions to get in the way. The opinion poll didn't ask anybody if they preferred anything to anything else. To state a preference is to choose between options. The poll asked if people approved of something, then asked if they approved of something else. The two questions are separable. Yet the headline says Republicans prefer strip clubs to mosques.

Furthermore, we don't know how many people said they would approve of strip clubs but not mosques, how many would approve of mosques and not strip clubs, how many approved of both and how many approved of neither. It is quite possible that all four permutations of answers were given by at least some Republicans. So what justifies the statement that 'crazy Republicans prefer strip clubs to mosques'? Following your rather vacuous argument about numerical relationships, then all of these relationships would exist: 'crazy Republicans prefer mosques to strip clubs', 'crazy Republicans like strip clubs as much as mosques', 'crazy Republicans dislike strip clubs as much as mosques'. Your point about the 'majority' is ill-taken because one natural reading of the headline is that the word 'Republicans' refers to Republicans in general, and not a small minority of Republicans. A more accurate, but less interesting headline would be: 'some crazy Republicans prefer strip clubs to mosques'. However, we can say with confidence that the overwhelming majority of Republicans voiced disapproval of both strip clubs and Mosques. What then is the point of highlighting that a minority of Republicans might prefer strip clubs to mosques? And why highlight Republicans with that opinion, and not Democrats or independents with that opinion? There must be some Democrats that prefer strip clubs to mosques, and there must be some independents who prefer strip clubs to mosques, yet neither of those groups are singled out as 'crazy'.

This debate about language is rather obviously absurd. The correct conclusion is not to digress into irrelevances about the merits of Christian cultures versus Islamic cultures but rather to conclude Mehdi suffers from chronic bias in interpreting opinion poll data. The point of the article is not to inform but to take a cheap shot at a supposed political enemy by making a deplorable generalization.

It is obvious from your response that your bias has interfered with your ability to impartially analyse the language of this article. I used analogy which you call 'needlessly evocative' and then you point out that sex trafficking occurs outside muslim countries. Well, obviously it does. I was making a point about how to construct provocative headlines based on insufficient justification, not seeking to express an opinion as to the extent to which different cultures abuse women. One might as well point out that 'crazy Democrats prefer strip clubs to mosques' that 'crazy independents prefer strip clubs to mosques' or that 'crazy fat Northerners prefer chips to porridge'. I merely chose an illustration that showed how easy it would be to use the same flawed approach to create a statement which Mehdi would doubtless categorize as Islamophobic. In other words, he is rather the hypocrite, and is willing to use techniques that I have seen him lambasting when they are employed by the right. Your main reason for defending this atrocious example of journalism is that you rather like the generalizations being made about Republicans. You seem to have no interest in the fact they are not supported by the facts cited, though I note your rather infantile appeal to what 'most people reading this piece' think about it. How ironic you feel qualified to speak on behalf of most people. Perhaps you should commission an opinion poll asking how many Republicans, Democrats and independents feel Mehdi's headline is justified by the data in the poll? And since when was English comprehension measured by opinion poll anyway?

Of course, it's a regular irony that some on the left obsess about the right's manipulation of language - and then immediately fall into the gutter of using the exact same tricks. 'Crazy Republicans', 'Loony Left'... it's all childish and depressing name-calling in the final evaluation.

triedeinsursE's picture

C’mon Sam, lets be fair. Can’t we all get along please?!! How about a strip club that features Muslim chicks bare ass naked wearing veils.

jie4v7i14's picture

Too right Osman, I would be the first to say someone is a total tit, people with personal institutional dead-ended for the rest of us, but Mehdi is well along the other end of the scale.

Well, what do you expect? I'm not going to like his arse - there are other online sites for that sort of thing.

But well posted Osman, too right.

AncientBriton's picture

That depends on your outlook Mam Tor. The point is that one should be free to choose. Compare the persecution of non-Muslims in Islamic countries with complaints of Islamophobia in other countries for just raising complaints about it. If you wish, take out religion and consider the issue on human rights.

jie4v7i14's picture

lick even, arse even, not...

Romana's picture

Do you know how pathetic you all sound!
It is a place of worship!
Y are muslims around the world being blamed for the crimes of some Fanatics!!!
Do WE blame christians for the genesis caused in the name of there faith around the rest of the world!!
GROW UP we live in a "democratic" society!!, So the mosque will be built

Eric Priezkalns's picture

This isn't polemic. It's just rubbish. I read this story expecting to hear about 'crazy Republicans'. What I found was Mehdi Hasan stooping to name-calling whilst indulging his preoccupation with islamophobia.

The poll says 80% of Republicans would be against building a strip club. They are more opposed to the building of the strip club than either Democrats or independents. So in what sense do they 'prefer' strip clubs to mosques? The overwhelming majority of Republicans are clearly opposed to both, as are a majority of independents and even a majority of Democrats.

One might as well write the headline "Crazy muslims prefer sex trafficking to Ramadan". If you looked hard enough, you'd find some muslims that like to abuse women but don't like to fast. Of course, it's wrong to make absurd and inaccurate generalizations about any group of people. It's wrong when the group is muslims and it's wrong when the group is supporters of the Republican Party in the US.

Time was that I read the New Statesman in order to be enlightened about what was happening in the world. Now it just reads like a boring rant by people who seem as twisted and prejudiced as those they target.

Shkara's picture

It's remarkable how simple-minded all the islamophobes here are. You would think that in a day and age where information and knowledge is so readily available that people would be more informed. However, it seems the more technologically advanced we become the more ignorance is spread and, what's worse, is more readily accepted.

Do you all really think Islam is all about holy war and aggression?? You are all prepared to reduce a whole civilisation and intellectual as well as spiritual universe (which is still very much alive today but not under the watchful eyes of the media because such perspectives doesn't sell well enough) to such a level? I don't know how you can consider yourselves educated or even civilised if you're prepared to make such bigoted, ignorant and unfair statements.

If we value and respect ourselves, we would be careful not to be unjust to others, otherwise how can we call ourselves civilised if we don't care about justice, one of the major pillars in any civilised society?

felix's picture

But why let little things like FACTS get in the way of prejudice, bigotry and fear-mongerring?
Kuffarophobia anyone...the essence of bigotry.

felix's picture

Prince Alwaleed 'against' Ground Zero mosque
Saudi Arabia’s Prince Alwaleed has said he is against the construction of a mosque close to the site of the 9/11 terror attacks in New York. In an exclusive interview with Arabian Business to be published on Sunday, His Royal Highness also said he had no part in financing the controversial project.

In his first public comments on the issue, he said: “I heard and saw a lot of news about me being associated with it and this is all wrong. We did not finance this thing.

“I say that I am against putting the mosque in that particular place. And I’ll tell you why. For two reasons: first of all, those people behind the mosque have to respect, have to appreciate and have to defer to the people of New York, and not try to agitate the wound by saying 'we need to put the mosque next to the 9/11 site'.

"The wound is still there. Just because the wound is healing you can’t say 'let’s just go back to where we were pre-9/11'," he said. “I am against putting the mosque there out of respect for those people who have been wounded over there.”
Prince Alwaleed added: “More importantly, the mosque is not in the best location, the mosque has to be in a dignified location. It can’t be next to a bar or a strip club, or in a neighbourhood that is not really refined and good. The impression I have is that this mosque is just being inserted and squeezed over there. So I am personally against putting the mosque over there…"

"I believe that Christians have the right to build churches where they want and Jews have the right to put synagogues where they want and Muslims have the right to put a mosque where they want. But you have to take care and respect the dignity of those New Yorkers who have been hit badly. Ten years ago is nothing when you talk about history.”

Several US news organizations claimed earlier this month that the prince had been involved in funding the construction of the mosque.

In the interview, the prince argued that the wounds of the twin terror attacks could take up to 30 years to heal. He said: “For sure, the wounds are so deep. What I’m saying is, it’s been a decade right now, and I would evaluate things at being at a standstill. They did not improve dramatically but they didn’t worsen. You see pockets of deterioration from people who don’t want things to advance,” he said.

“I don’t want to exaggerate and say things are falling apart, they are not. Most governments are pragmatic, most people are logical. There are pockets of extremism in Israel, in the US and in the Muslim world. But we have to fight them with reason, with logic and with compassion. We can’t just say ‘go to hell,’ we cannot do that.”

*The full interview with HRH will be published at 8am UAE time on Sunday 31 October on www.arabianbusiness.com. The following day, 1 November, Arabian Business will also publish the first magazine interview with his wife, HH Princess Ameerah Al Taweel

http://www.arabianbusiness.com/world-exclusive-prince-alwaleed-against-g...

Stuart Eels's picture

We certainly get all viewpoints on these pages, theres the idiotic,racist, intolerant rants of Buckskins on one side and the idioctic stupid, intolerants rants of Ehtch Tee on the other and sometimes they go so far they could be twins!

Regarding Mehdi Hasans post, I believe Moslems were among the victims in the twin towers ande American Moslems fight in the American Forces, enough said!

John Bennett's picture

Strippers represent tolerance and openness. Strippers go too far in the direction of personal satisfaction. Muslims, when they go too far, mutilate and murder people en masse. Strippers can be reasoned with. Strippers tell you when they're going to screw you, Muslims don't.

James's picture

@Eric

I'm aware you were using the "Crazy muslims" as an analogy to get your point across but it is a needlessly evocative analogy. So I shall first point out that sex-trafficking is an endemic problem in Christian/Atheist Europe, and there's plenty of abuse of women by white Christian/atheist men in Europe and England for that matter.

The analogy is also flawed (which adds further to the needlessness of it). It was an opinion poll, your analogy is about behaviour. Behaviour and opinion are different and may even diverge within the same person.
I LIKE sex, I should imagine on a base level having sex with my neighbour's wife would be quite satisfying, that doesn't mean I hold the opinion that I should have sex with my neighbour's wife.

Regarding the central theme of your piece, I'd start by saying read carefully what Mehdi's caption says:

"Crazy Republicans prefer strip clubs to mosques."

That is an accurate description of an opinion polls that seeks to represent Republicans views as singular mass of individuals.

For instance, Mehdi's statement would still stand correct if the poll also revealed that 75% preferred Italian restaurants. So you could then say "Republicans prefer Italian restaurants to strip clubs." This is accurate is it not? In this situation he could also have said "The vast majority of Republican would prefer an Italian Restaurant to a strip club."

Likewise, he can then say "Republicans prefer strip clubs to mosques" because that is the next bigger smaller relationship. But in this situation what he cannot AND DOES NOT say is that "the vast majority of Republicans would prefer a strip club to a mosque."

So therefore what he said is completely accurate and acceptable.
If you drew the inference that he was implying that the vast majority or even majority of republican supported strip clubs to a mosque being built on ground zero, I suggest you be a little more careful in your reading of the English language.

I think the obvious and correct inference to take is that more Republicans support strip clubs being built near ground zero than mosques.
I think most people reading this piece gleaned that.

Sam's picture

I’m trying to get a continuous conversation going on Islamic and Muslim topics like the ones raised in this article. I envision that some conversations will help Muslims to reach a consensus on important issues that currently divide Muslims. Other discussions will be designed to provide a forum for people of all religions to discuss Islam in an open environment. The website is http://www.discussislam.org/

Cameron's picture

@Osman - you completely missed my use of the word "disproportionate". Suggest you re-read and then re-comment with a relevant reply. The media creates the agenda, there are just as many Hindus in Britain, perhaps Medhi will write about them from time to time.

Ehctch Tee, again, you miss my acknowledgement that this is a real problem, but still it does not justify Mehdi using so much of his space as a political editor on this issue. It is perhaps something that adds to the problem when such people are so vocal to thrust Islam into our face, such as this article: http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/mehdi-hasan/2010/08/tim-winter-muslim-...

Beast Of No Nation's picture

RE: Strip Clubs.
What sort of Strip clubs are we talking about here? Ones with half/semi naked women gyrating around a fixed pole or ones where suspicious looking Muslims are taken for a strip search? I am a bit confused.

Cameron's picture

@Etctch Tee - should also point out, i'm Scottish and not a Tory (why would I be reading the new statesman if I was).

I guess I will go back to putting my head in the sand. Until then, why don't you search for an article in the New Statesman about Hinduism in the UK and the issues the Hindu community faces.

Queendarara's picture

PLZ VISIT BLOG.......M NEW BLOGGER..........I NEED U...................

http://topfashionblog4pk.blogspot.com/

jie4v7i14's picture

Stuart Eels still shoving out his spiels, mission in nothing...

At least Stuat E I actual say something quite sharp in another corner of NS.

A song for you, Stuart Eels, to show I still love you,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZLAvCgV80s

Benedict's picture

Er, isn't the proposed Cordoba Center a political issue, albeit one in USA?

Greg Dyke's picture

What a world we live! Does Mehdi find an Amerikkanindian with belt girdle and shaved vulva in open display, not to mention breasts not innocent but reprehensible? Why have we brought these cloned sheep/human beings to our country and put them in positions of responsbility. mehdi does not even realize the irony of inherent within his blog. This not a native innocence like the naked woman but malicious stupidity.

jie4v7i14's picture

....so what the fuck......

Latest tweets