Video: Nick Robinson versus anti-war placard
Hilarious cameraphone vid of the BBC’s political editor trashing an anti-war protester’s sign on Col
By Mehdi Hasan Published 21 October 2010 13:22Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















71 comments
Totally out of order to destroy an innocent protestors belongings.
Yes he did loose his rag, embarrassingly so.
It is part of his job to report under such "conditions" so if he can't handle it he should leave the area and report elsewhere.
Besides that he is a biased political reporter and should rejoin the Conservative party.
If he is doing an interview in front of the Home Office, can we assume now he is going to rip down their insignia?
Nick Robinson wasn't an ordinary card carrying member of the Tories, he ended up being national head of the student wing of the party.
That was when they were called The Young Conservatives and most of them held views that Maggie T would have found a bit right wing.
I find it shocking that people still claim the BBC to be pro-Labour. You have Robinson, Marr, Paxman and Neil presenting the bulk of BBC political programming and all of them happen to have Conservative sympathies!
People are making a real meal of this and misrepresenting what happened in the description. As far as I can see he stayed pretty calm and didn't stamp on the banner - he just stamped on the pole to break it and remove it. Plus he was apparently willing to debate with the protester as he left the platform.
And by the way why is that part edited so tightly? Why not show us more of what was said? Or perhaps it doesn't suit the agenda?
I am relatively new to politics and have to agree with a few posters above. How is Andrew Neill allowed to cover politics on the BBC. He is totally biased towards the conservative party. I do find him funny and a good presenter but surely the beeb should be impartial.
Hilarious indeed. Is he a member of the Adam Boulton school of professional journalism and broadcasting?
I wouldn't mind but it's not as if the placard protester was shouting out continuously like they were doing earlier and disturbing the broadcasts.
It comes to something when free speech in the political heart of our democracy, silent protest even, is silenced by the media.
Take a chill pill Nick.
.
Andrew Neil is not biased. He gives everyone a hard time, regardless of Party. None of the BBC presenters are biased, although a question mark hangs over ITV interviewers who have a tendency to favour the Tories
"Had Quite Enough (Spammer), a lot of Iraqis didn't get much of fair trial when being slaughtered in their thousands by the soldiers to whom you play the role of groupie"
I didn’t see a single word about that being for American soldiers or Marines. It happened to be written by a USMC Chaplain. Iraqi soldiers were not slaughtered. Many were killed fighting for Saddam, that’s hardly a slaughter. The slaughter occurred in Kuwait where those Iraqi soldiers raped, murdered, and slaughtered at will during their occupation of that country.
I realize it’s popular to trash talk The United States at any opportunity by Brits. Those same American soldiers are the ones that did your fighting for you when the British ran from Basra and now in Helmand province Afghanistan. It was American soldiers that twice came to your country’s aid when it was YOUR country’s security under threat. Then gave you billions to rebuild your country that was squandered by your govt. trying to play the big shot on the world stage. We never asked for thanks. We do expect a little more courtesy by our supposed to be allies.
Why?
Hilarious? Err... you need to watch some comedy.
I actually thought he handled the confrontation quite well. "loses it" is a bit of a ridiculous claim.
The funniest part was the fact someone actually clapped him for doing it! A brave move at an anti-war protest...
but seriously....
Why did they keep recording when it was obvious the clip could not be used?
Secondly, I might have some sympathy for NR if he had made some attempt to reason with the protester. I think he comes across as a pompous prick.
Swatantra
Andrew Neil is very biased. I saw him interviewing Ken Livingstone. Livingstone started to articulate the position that the worries about the deficit are exaggerated. However, Neil didn't choose to probe that position with any questions. He just talked over Livingstone in a rather childish manner and said he was talking nonsense.
No other BBC interviewer would have been so unprofessional.
to be fair, he was probably just a bit understandably pissed off at the banner messing up his piece, I severely doubt Nick Robinson even read it before he broke it.
Wonderfully characteristic first comment on YouTube: “The people should not stand for cuts in their own country while continuing to fight these ridiculous wars. The Jews have taken control of your government too.”
Frankly, confronted with that while trying to do my job I might “loose” it too.
The BBC is the mouthpiece of the establishment, it's no more neutral than a can of acid.
I'm amazed at the number of gullible contributors to this blog. Or are they told by their party to post on these blogs to influence and educate those of us who think for ourselves?
Check out medialens for a balanced incisive view of our media and the BBC's role in the propaganda machinery.
Once a Tory, always a Tory. Totally uncalled for, but just shows you what he really thinks, if you didn't know already.
I think I'd have cheered if Nick had done a prescott. Some people have no manners.
Ok it might not be rolling on the floor hilarity but it is hilarious - as in cheerful, very funny - that Nick Robinson can't handle a silent protestor behind him and has to react in any way at all.
The protester has as much legal right to be there as Nick and the media crews.
If the protester had grabbed Nick's clipboard of notes and destroyed it in frustration, the reaction would be very different wouldn't it.
The issue is not 'free speech', but rather the protester deliberately trying to hijack and thereby ruin NR's report on the spending review. NR's job is to produce video, the protester was stopping him doing that. He could have held up the placard elsewhere.
If you were a sculptor and I kept nudging your arm with a placard would that count as a legitimate protest protected by a right to free speech?
I thought it was hilarious, especially shown alongside Nick's self-satisfied smile at his little "over the edge" comment ". The protesters silence while the poster slowly turned to reveal another message was especially good. Can't help thinking the camera crew were amused.
What with his interjection at the Labour leadership count, Nick Robinson is getting his come-uppance for over valuing his importance. Maybe he should try his hand at stand-up comedy.