Bliar
Peter Mandelson’s memoir confirms how slippery Tony Blair was as prime minister.
By Mehdi Hasan Published 14 July 2010 18:06
Andrew Sparrow, on the Guardian's politics blog, highlights this particular extract (below) from Peter Mandelson's new memoir, The Third Man, which relates to a conversation Tony Blair had with the self-described Prince of Darkness in 2003.
Blair had done a "deal" with Gordon Brown over standing down before the 2005 election at a meeting with Brown and John Prescott, and here Mandelson relays the then prime minister's summary of that meeting:
"What I've told him [Brown] and John, and I really mean it, is that if Gordon really backs me and helps me and implements my policy, I'll be happy to step down."
"Really?" I asked. He [Blair] paused a moment before replying. "Well, I don't think he'll help me. So the situation won't arise. It won't happen. But I've got to do this -- so play along."
This is classic Blair: slippery, evasive, lawyerly, disingenuous. (I love the "I really mean it" and the "paused a moment before replying" and the "play along").
Our former prime minister spent years -- in the Commons, in press conferences, in TV interviews -- formulating and constructing his sentences and, in particular, his denials, in such a way as always to allow himself wriggle room, if not an out-and-out get-out clause. I remember, as a producer on ITV1's Jonathan Dimbleby programme, preparing for interviews with Blair in the run-up to the 2005 general election. Back then, my colleagues and I were in agreement that it was impossible for Jonathan to pin him down.
And never forget the way in which he defended his decision to go to war in Iraq, telling the Labour party conference in September 2004:
The problem is, I can apologide for the information that turned out to be wrong, but I can't, sincerely at least, apologise for removing Saddam.
The New York Times aptly referred to it at the time as "an apology, of sorts, over Iraq". The thing is, nobody asked him to apologise for "removing Saddam" or for the information being "wrong"; we wanted an apology for his misrepresentation of the "sporadic and patchy" intelligence on weapons of mass destruction and for the catastrophically bloody consequences of the 2003 invasion.
But that was Blair for you: always ready to frame the question and the answer in a manner that best suited him and his interests. And he expected the rest of us to "play along".
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















5 comments
Crikey it didn't take Mand long to get his retaliation in first, did it?
Iraq was a dreadful error that will cast Blair in the role of Anthony Eden for the rest of his days. Iraq will be in the first line of his obituary.
Blair should admit that Iraq was a major error that was largely of his own making. That he was too close to Bush and ignored the opinion of the British people and his party.
His much reduced majority in 2005 was due in no small part to Iraq. His unwillingness to retire led to Brown to taking over when he was too old and well known.
Having no Iraq war means we would probably still have a Labour Government today.
My copy of Mad Mandy's book is winging its way from amazon as we speak roll on tomorrow morning i say.
For all of his many faults i would still have Blair over Brown Iraq while it should never have gone ahead,wasn't a deal breaker for myself at least but i know others feel differently about it.
Its a shame though he'll always be remembered for Iraq and not the other thing he managed to achieve such as NI.
Yep - can't disagree.
But the people of this great democracy voted for him three times in a row - even after the terrible Iraqi crime against humanity.
During the last election a Labour local campainer told me the war was over - looking at me puzzled - this was a couple of days after the survey into birth defects around Fallujah was published.
That tells me
Most people are thick
Most people don't care about Iraq like you do.
You are in a minority.
I find myself gobsmacked at how completely in agreement I am with Mehdi on this. I would agree that 'caring about Iraq' has unfortunately been/become a minority pursuit. Mehdi forgets that the overwhelming majority of the electorate either voted for Labour, the Tories (who supported the war) or just weren't bothered enough to turn up (and frankly I'm sick of talking about how only 22% of the 'electorate' voted for Labour in 2005 - decisions are made by those who show up and if you don't vote I don't see why your absenteeism should be counted against anothers mandate.)
Post new comment