Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

Mehdi Hasan

Mehdi Hasan’s polemical take on politics, economics and foreign affairs

Syndicate contentRSS

Will Michael Gove’s school reforms push up standards?

The evidence from Sweden ain’t great.

My column in this week's magazine addresses -- and criticises -- the Education Secretary Michael Gove's plan to expand the previous government's academies programme.

I didn't have time or space to scrutinise the other key (and controversial) plank of his proposed reforms to the education sector: the introduction of Swedish-style "free schools". But the Institute of Education's Rebecca Allen has, in an article in the latest issue of Research in Public Policy (published by the Centre for Market and Public Organisation), and the overall results don't make great reading for Gove and his allies.

From the press release:

Research on Sweden's "free school" reforms suggests that the entry of new schools had a positive effect on pupils' academic achievements. But according to a survey of the evidence by Rebecca Allen, the benefits are small, they are predominantly focused on children from highly educated families and they do not persist: scores are no higher in the end-of-school exams.

Allen concludes that the experience of Sweden is helpful, but necessarily limited, in the extent to which it can help predict the impact of school reforms in England. One reason for this is that the schools also underwent a radical decentralisation of the education system, which would seem to be critical for promoting diversity and productivity gains through experimentation in free schools.

Sweden also has fewer reasons to be concerned that a free school system will produce greater school stratification since the country's lower levels of income and skill inequalities mean there is far less need for parents to choose schools based on social composition. It is also possible that Sweden's stronger tradition of non-standard schooling -- such as Steiner and Montessori schools -- is leading to a greater diversity of provision than parents in England would ever demand.

 

Tags: education

9 comments

UberMoo's picture

No.

clem the gem's picture

According to past Newstatesman article, the best education system in Europe is found in Finland.
This is a country with NO private sector in education, and a uniform system of Compehensive schooling throughout.
We suffer from education being a political football here - as it has been for the last century or so.
The post-Gerbil landscape is dominated by one thing - the need to keep costs down whilst appearing to give everyone a decent start in life.
This is the sad logic of league tables and "parental choice" that now reaffirms our hardening class-bound society.
Dont get me started on the standards we use to give each succesive year yet higher pass levels...

swatantra nandanwar's picture

It never ceases to amaze me that just because a 'system' may work in a country with a popultion around 5m, that people imagine it could work in countries with populations of 70m. There is no direct correlation.
I have doubts about the Australian points system, and I have doubts about the Swiss Canton system as well as the doubts about Icelands Banking system.

Lou's picture

Michael Gove's plans will be to the detriment of those pupils not in academies. The academies will be entitled to funding from your LEA so that means these new academies will be taking money, from an already restricted budget before we even get the budget, that otherwise would be going to non academy schools.
If standards are going to be affected, then it will be to the detriment of non academy attending pupils and their schools.

clem the gem's picture

It never ceases to amaze me that as we have never had a completely unified education system, people in this country are so eager to trash one that works in another European country.
The UK has lagged behind the rest of western world in Education policy and outcomes for more than a century.
Why would anyone feel that this was a good enough state of affairs?
In an already grotesquwely divided educational system, how on earth is the addition of yet one more division of resources going to benefit the next generation?
What kind of education do we want for them? What kind of future are we prepared to accept for the majority of our nations' children?

Having had numerous family members who have worked or currently work as teachers, I have grave doubts that our education "system" is fit for any useful purpose, and that these changes will achieve anything but further inequality.

clem the gem's picture

See, I cant even spell grotesquely!

Lou's picture

Back to school for you then Clem! ;o)

I just think that if this is about standards as Michael Gove says, then why not focus on improving the standards of the schools we already have?

This is a good article on the history of academy schools, the pros and cons etc.....
http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2010/02/in-a-league-of-their-own/

From the page - " Other academies haven’t fared so well. The United Learning Trust (ULT), an Anglican charity, runs 17 academies and is the country’s largest sponsor. Last summer, three of its London academies were at the bottom of their local tables in GCSE results. In Sheffield, Ofsted recommended special measures for one of its academies and told another that “teaching and learning are inadequate.” In November 2009, ULT was told by the government that it couldn’t expand further until its existing schools improved".

clem the gem's picture

If only I could Lou!

Swimming with Sharks's picture

Didn't an academy in Sheffield just have a long hard year of pointing fingers and lawyers fees because the head left...?? We need to be referring to the history of academies in this nation rather than elsewhere...!

Why are we still fighting on the political battlefield about our schools and education system? Surely what it is all about is actually educating the children to secure our future?

Mehdi, comparing Britain to Sweden is complete folly. I'm surprised you are using this source as ammo against the plans.

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets