Mehdi Hasan

Mehdi Hasan’s polemical take on politics, economics and foreign affairs

Syndicate contentRSS

The truth about unemployment

It would have been much worse under the Tories.

Tory bloggers like Iain Dale have been getting very excited about today's unemployment figures, ahead of the Chancellors' debate on BBC2 this afternoon.

The figures are bad - but, as ever, some context is needed.

From a TUC press release that just popped into my inbox:

If unemployment had followed the same trend in the recent downturn as that in the 1980s recession, it would have kept rising until November 2014 and the dole queues would have been twice as long, according to a TUC analysis of the latest unemployment figures published today.

Six months after the end of the recent recession, there are 1.54 million people claiming unemployment benefit and the numbers are falling throughout the country. But six months after the 1980s recession ended, there were 2.32 million people on the dole and the claimant count was still rising.

A TUC analysis of claimant count unemployment across the UK since 1980 shows that Scotland, Northern Ireland and the East Midlands took the longest to recover from the 1980s recession.

Back in the 1980s, the number of people claiming the dole was more than twice as high at its peak as it is today in cities such as Newcastle, Liverpool, Manchester, Sheffield and Bristol, the TUC analysis shows.

Oh, and before you dismiss the TUC's analysis as leftie/Labour/trade union propaganda, here's CBI boss Richard Lambert speaking at the RSA in March:

Then there's the remarkable story of what's happened to the employment numbers in the course of this recession. Output has fallen by 6.2 per cent from the peak: unemployment is down just 1.9 per cent.

In the last recession, by contrast, GDP was down by 2.5 per cent and employment by 3.4 per cent.

The Tories, on the other hand, would have made unemployment much worse than it is now, with swingeing and immediate cuts to spending. Cameronomics has been tried in Ireland - and found wanting. Here's my NS colleague Danny Blanchlower, one of the world's leading labour-market economists, writing on the Irish experience:

In Ireland where the government has implemented Draconian public-spending cuts, unemployment now stands at 13.3 percent, up 5 percentage points on the year and rising at about 0.3 percent a month, with no peak in sight.

On Friday, the government will actually have some positive economic figures to trumpet, when the preliminary estimate of first quarter GDP growth for the UK is published. It's expected to show modest growth - 0.4 per cent? - and a further rise in manufacturing output. I'm intrigued as to how the Tories will respond. But, with the economy fragile and still reliant on public investment, I agree with Gordon Brown, the OECD, the IMF, David Blanchflower, Barack Obama, Vince Cable and the TUC - early spending cuts could plunge the UK back into recession and make unemployment much, much worse.

(The Conservative party, meanwhile, have released a new poster illustrating their depth of concern for the jobless.)

 

 

 

9 comments

jackie's picture

Bollocks. How have I "got very excited"?

Unemployment has always been higher at the end of a Labour term of office than the beginning. Fact.

undercoveragent's picture

Blanchflower is the authority in this subject. The Tories and their apologists have no understanding of deficit economics. They should all read Lord Skidelsky's biography of Keynes.
The unemployment figures are interesting. Fewer people are claiming unemployment benefit but the overall number of jobless has risen. No doubt the figures would have been much higher without the stimulus.
The key figures to watch out for on Friday are first-quarter GDP output figures. If they show growth, Labour have won the argument. Period.

jmedwards's picture

"The truth about unemployment: It would have been much worse under the Tories."

And yet you couldn't predict the financial collapse, too?

How about tonight's lottery numbers?

Or do your Mystic Meg abilities extend only as far as Conservative bashing goes?

ottispenning1024's picture

From your blog Iain, I get the impression you were salivating at the figures, delighted at the numbers of unemployed.

If Cameron had been in charge, we'd all be bollocksed right now (to use your chosen vernacular). The tories are swinging back to their hard right cave in sheer panic.

If Cameron doesn't become PM, anyone fancy opening a betting book on which method his party will use to remove him?

stevem1's picture

The Tories have always been the party of unemployment. How does Ian Dale explain the savage defeat of the Tories in the 1945 election.they were responsiblw for the "Hungry Thirties". People actually died from poor diet caused by poverty.No return to unemployment was the biggest issue in 1945 and the Tories were hammered. The 80's Thatcher government returned the UK to the figures last seen before the War. Old one nation Tories like McMillan were horrified. It is a fact Ian that that government ran a policy of high unemployment as Norman Lamont indicated. You as a party ahve absolutely nothing to say on unemployment. Oh! and just a last comment. It was the 1945 Labour Government which gave the UK full employment for the first time in economic history.

davidk1's picture

The number of people claiming JSA fell last month by 32,900 - the fourth time the figure has fallen in the last five months. Apparently, this is a more useful guide to what's happening in the employment market because it deals with up to date figures than used for the total jobless data.

More here:

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=503211&in_p...

David Wearing1's picture

..oh, and btw., the reason for that is that the historic purpose of the Conservative Party always has been, and always will be, straightforward class war.

David Wearing1's picture

Of course, this story isn't over yet. A Tory government would gleefully exploit the deficit as an excuse chance to live out every sordid anti-public sector fantasy they've nurtured since the 1980s. And that will mean grotesque levels of unemployment (the victims of which can then be blamed for their feckless idleness by the smugly well-born).

The pain of the crash was deferred by the fiscal stimulus. All three parties seem intent to ensure that the general public bears more than its share of that pain when the time comes, but the Tories will be particularly sadistic in their assault on the public realm and all those who rely on it. They will also be particularly keen to ensure that their friends in the City are held harmless from the disaster they created.

Law's picture

The Conservatives created large-scale permanent structural unemployment in the north and Scotland by pursuing policies of deindustrialisation in the 1980s. This is why everyone from Luton upwards hates the Tories. Labour has hidden the structural unemployment with incapacity benefit. Their continued deference to finance capital has only worsened the problem - deindustrialisation has continued at an even faster rate. We live off the scraps of the money launderers and are still kissing their feet.

Latest tweets