Mehdi Hasan

Mehdi Hasan’s polemical take on politics, economics and foreign affairs

Syndicate contentRSS

Obama: the betrayal?

Liberals and leftists are falling out of love with Barack

I took a lot of flak for my cover story in the New Statesman -- "How Obama went wrong and became Barack W Bush" -- in early October, but I note the tide is turning on the liberal left. Will Straw has already blogged about how MoveOn.org has condemned President Obama for his troop "surge" in Afghanistan.

And now I see the eminent American liberal historian Garry Wills has added his voice to those accusing Obama of "betrayal" in a post on the New York Review of Books blog:

I did not think he would lose me so soon -- sooner than Bill Clinton did. Like many people, I was deeply invested in the success of our first African-American president. I had written op-ed pieces and articles to support him in the New York Times and the New York Review of Books. My wife and I had maxed out in donations for him. Our children had been ardent for his cause.

Others I respect have given up on him before now. I can see why. His backtracking on the treatment of torture (and photographs of torture), his hesitations to give up on rendition, on detentions, on military commissions, and on signing statements, are disheartening continuations of George W Bush's heritage. But I kept hoping that he was using these concessions to buy leeway for his most important position, for the ground on which his presidential bid was predicated.

There was only one thing that brought him to the attention of the nation as a future president. It was opposition to the Iraq war. None of his serious rivals for the Democratic nomination had that credential -- not Hillary Clinton, not Joseph Biden, not John Edwards. It set him apart. He put in clarion terms the truth about that war -- that it was a dumb war, that it went after an enemy where he was not hiding, that it had no indigenous base of support, that it had no sensible goal and no foreseeable cutoff point.

He said that he would not oppose war in general, but dumb wars. On that basis, we went for him. And now he betrays us. Although he talked of a larger commitment to Afghanistan during his campaign, he has now officially adopted his very own war, one with all the disqualifications that he attacked in the Iraq engagement. This war too is a dumb one.

He adds:

If we had wanted Bush's wars, and contractors, and corruption, we could have voted for John McCain. At least we would have seen our foe facing us, not felt him at our back, as now we do. The Republicans are given a great boon by this new war. They can use its cost to say that domestic needs are too expensive to be met -- health care, education, infrastructure. They can say that military recruitments from the poor make job creation unnecessary. They can call it Obama's war when it is really theirs.

Wills concludes:

I cannot vote for any Republican. But Obama will not get another penny from me, or another word of praise, after this betrayal. And in all this I know that my disappointment does not matter. What really matters are the lives of the young men and women he is sending off to senseless deaths.

14 comments

writeoff's picture

What also matters is his willingness to ignore the Coup in Honduras and recognise a corrupt election, giving the stamp of approval to a template for a new age of vicious dictatorships across Latin America. John Negroponte is advising Clinton, for god's sake. Judge a man by the company he keeps, but we knew he was sham before, these people were just dopes.

Robert NYC's picture

Obama has betrayed the left on every position thus far. This comes as a surprise to you? He is a plain politician and cares only for his own survival. On top of this he is incompetent. Thanx for cursing the country with this dead weight business as usual con man.

Khan's picture

American Presidents do not change they have been the same for ever and especially so in the last 60 years. Anyone who looks into American history will see it looks much the same now as it did 200 years ago but then it was the Indians getting it. I had hope for Obama but that has long gone as he treads the familiar path of the rest.

swatantra's picture

Who said Obama was on the Left? He is a Democrat and a Centrist. He was never a Socialist. Its difficult to be a socialist in America because the term is often unfairly confused with Communist.

writeon1's picture

Though I've said it myself, for effect, Obama didn't betray anyone, at least not if one was paying attention to what he actually said, as opposed to what one desparately hoped he was saying, Obama is, after all, just another politician.

pete999's picture

Wait a minute... was I the only one who saw Obama repeatedly talk about the need to do more in Afghanistan?

You know, all that stuff about sending more troops.

Hes got the US on the path out of Iraq in a way that doesnt let the country turn to shit, and hes living up to his campaign promise to focus on Afghanistan.

All while propping up a crumbling economy and beggining the process of healthcare reform. As well as bringing science and evidence to the fore rather than superstitious idiocy.

Hes really not that bad.

fortrosenz's picture

Thanks pete999. The whole earth is shifting and Obama is playing his part.

The key is his ability to help people to see that THEY can make a difference. He can't do it by himself and he has said that very often.

charles dukes's picture

Obama should not accept the Nobel Peace Prize - his foreign policy is in stark contrast - and will not achieve anything.

Freeman2's picture

Obama clearly said in the campaign that Afghanistan would be his war. Anyone who did not hear this was not listening.

Protagonisto's picture

I think Barak Obama has little choice in this matter, if the US were to pull out of Afghanistan chaos would ensue, cause regional instability of a launch pad for global terrorism. What I think you are seeing is a concerted effort by the right to try and discredit him, there are huge financial vested interests that would like to derail some of his policies. For example health care, about 17.5% of the GDP has a stake in the status quo. unfortunately the propaganda machine is well financed on the right.

Luddite.'s picture

The love affair didn't last long.

Barry MacTavish's picture

Amazing comments here!

Thanks for the laugh guys.

MikeS1's picture

He said very clearly during the campaign that he would wind down in Iraq but increase the intensity of the war in Afghanistan. More or less what he has done. I am not a great fan but why the hysteria from the left?Except that it is the only behavioural mode they know.

Cassam's picture

Obama' s candidacy was not just supported by a large section of ordinary Americans; it was massively financially supported by big corporations. He was their calculated choice. And they have been proved right. If a Republican had become the President, he might have carried out his right-wing policies against tremendous opposition from the liberal intellengisia as well as ordinary folks. W

ith Obama as the President, the same policies the corporate America and the military-industrial complex want, may be carried out for a long time with opposition very confused and reluctant to criticize him even when they can see him betraying many of his election promises. They will hang on the few progressive crumbs thrown at them by him as an excuse to prevaricate. Moreover, he had given enough notice that his administration would concentrate on the military surge in Afganistan in his election speeches. About Israel also, I read in The Spokesman many months ago that according to Chomsky, he did not hide his partiality and support for Israel either.

Latest tweets