Labour's lost generation takes the reins
It is time for the young left to stop schmoozing and get on with what it does best: rampant idealism.
By Laurie Penny Published 28 September 2010 12:22
Behind the railroad pass in the quiet backstreets of central Manchester, the Young Labour Party is in full swing and, rather fittingly, two check-shirted DJs are spinning out the greatest hits of 1994. Here, the weary, battle-worn young volunteers, envelope-stuffers, advisers, canvassers, councillors, hash-taggers, tweeters, bloggers and fiddlers have come to unwind after nine sweltering months on ever-more desperate and depressing campaign trails. The room is full of shirtsleeves, sleepy smiles, and the barest suggestion of sex as a hundred earnest men and women in their early twenties realise that for the first time in almost a year, there's time to flirt.
Yesterday Ed Miliband spoke lavishly of Labour's young people, and here they are. This is the "new generation" of whom so much is promised, whose task it is to revivify the party and move on from the more embarrassing losses of the New Labour project. Watching them giggle and slurp pink cider and shuffle to the strains of Salt-n-Pepa, one wants to yell: you've just suffered the greatest defeat the Labour Party has seen for a generation! Most of you aren't even old enough to remember the last Tory government! The coalition is about to turn on the public sector with what Mehdi Hasan today called "fiscal sadism" -- cutting for the sake of cutting -- and your gang could be out of power for another ten years. Why on earth are you all so bloody happy?
Perhaps it's because, as one young Labour blogger told me, "we don't have to pretend any more". There is certainly an atmosphere of relieved sincerity at this conference, with less naked ambition and jostling for ministerial internships and points on CVs. Perhaps now the young left can finally stop "schmoozing and gossiping about who went to dinner with whom" and get on with what it's best at: rampant idealism.
Earlier this week, a prominent Labour figure commented that the party has been so caught up in campaigning that it has not yet come to terms with the profundity of its defeat. That may be true of the shadow cabinet, but it's not the case for Labour's "new generation": these young people know exactly what has been lost, and why, and how badly. They are fully aware of the scale of New Labour's defeat, and the atmosphere is exhilarated. "I think a lot of people are excited," says Vince, who volunteered on Ed Miliband's campaign. "The real fight is still to come, but we've dropped a lot of baggage, and it's all a clean canvas now."
For my generation, remember, New Labour is overwhelmingly associated with betrayal, hypocrisy and disappointment. Despite the Ace of Base pumping out of the sound system, most of us are far too young to remember the true horror of the Thatcher years, or even the elation of 1997. Instead, we remember top-up fees, civil-liberties crackdowns, the crash of 2008 and the Iraq invasion.
"As part of a generation who have grown up under New Labour, turning the page on old orthodoxies couldn't come soon enough," says Sam Tarry, the National Chair of Young Labour. "Ed Miliband's campaign really connected with the next generation of party members -- his willingness to listen and move on mobilised young activists to get involved in a big way. With many of the new young MPs backing Ed Miliband, too, this could signal a re-imagining of the party at the grassroots, with more focus on setting out a credible economic alternative."
Labour's new cohort knows what it's like to lose. We are, after all, the lost generation. We don't expect our dreams and ideals to be realised without a fight, and we don't expect much help from the grown-ups. There is a profound sense at this party conference that the elder generation of Labour statespeople has failed us, and that the time for deference is finally done. "Young Labour is buzzing with ideas, enthusiasm and anticipation of what can be achieved following this conference," said Tarry. With the politicians who saddled us with debt, tanked the economy and took us into Iraq shuffling off into the twilight, one thing's certain: it's our turn now.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















40 comments
"our" turn now, you say?
Didn't you call for a vote for the LibDems at the last election? Idiot.
Ed should go out on a Friday and Saturday night along the Palatine Road Manchester and see the streets awash with youngsters spilling out of the clubs fast food joints pubs or just hanging around. There are 2 universities in Manchester to their credit, so Manchester is a young and vibrant city. Its also a noisy dirty and risque town, particularly in the late hours.
It would be great if more youngsters and students put their energies into politics and changing society for the better.
@David Vinter - sorry but you must represent the *extremely* old. Us 40-50somethings *love* punk as we were there when it started! It's the sounds of our youth! ==:-)
T Man, thank you for the clarification - and so charmingly expressed! May I point out that There is certainly an atmosphere of relieved sincerity at this conference, with less naked ambition and jostling for ministerial internships and points on CVs. is a straight quote from Laurie's piece; it's her perception I'm responding to, not my own.
It is time for the young left to stop schmoozing and get on with what it does best: rampant idealism. It's usually rampant idealism that gets people killed. Let's just try, sticking with good government.
Can someone explain the difference between----Blair saying--"A new dawn has broken" in 1997 and Milliband saying--"We are the new generation" as of now?
@David Vinter
Well, the words are different for a start.
Labour are only Social Democrats from the tainted personal perspective of a certain demographic.
A more accurate description of Labour, for the millions priced out of housing, would be, [Economic] Facists.
[The Labour Party are directly responsible for inflating the biggest asset bubble in History. The Housing Market.
Labour then transferred that debt onto everyone else in society.
So our money is being stolen, through QE, Low IR, increased taxes, mortgate relief, etc, to pay for this toxic mortgage debt, to bail out the banks. In effect, our money is being de-valued and stolen to pay for other peoples houses.
Whilst keeping houses massively overinflated, and ensuring millions can never afford their own small house.]
Obviously not a 'socialist' or 'democratic' act.
The Labour party has implemented policies which support one section of a society, to the extreme detriment of another section of that society [via blatant theft and cronyism]
The most notable characteristic of a FACIST ideology is the separation and persecution or denial of equality to a specific segment of the population.
The preferred class lives in relative comfort, while the oppressed class lives in a Facist state.
Labour are [justifiably] hated like no other government whom has held power amongst certain segments of society.
And Labour have yet to even comment on those issues......
Good article Laurie, but not as forensic as the YC one a while back.
It would be good to see an increase in idealism in all parts of the Labour Party, and more interesting still to find out what the ideas of the 30,000 members who joined since May actually are. We, both old and young, are by and large untainted by the infighting at the top over the last few years, and, lets not forget, joined the losing party . we must want Labour to do something, surely?
Was a hilarious night, particularly ben bradshaw's near collapse from laughter after his dodgilly recieved speech. Although i hear the bar staff got lots of abuse from our self appointed new ceasars
If the Margaret Thatcher years were so bad, how come she kept on being re elected? Remember the gap between the poorest and the richest was lower then than now. In fact for most of her premiership there was a
60% top rate of income tax.
Even today over one and a half million trade unionists vote Tory!
Facing the disappointment of their first defeat from office since 1979 , there was right wing media speculation as to whether the |Labour party will fall into the fracas of the squabbling which ensued the defeat of 1979 . There is on e major difference between the Labour party of 1979 and the one of 2010 .
The main difference is that the conservative party did not need the help of the party which finished third to form a Government in 1979 , and many of the old guard on the Labour party who controlled the party are also gone .
Now with regards to those who voted for the Conservative party in 1979 , did not experience 13 years of Labour , therefore there are a lot of the younger generation who actually believe that things were really great under the Conservative administration .
Ed Miliband's main dilemma is to to ensure that he has the support of small businesses in the country as well as support from the increasing number of low paid workers in Great Britain, and build for a future for the youth of this nation , which the coalition is failing , and will fail to do , as their policies are akin to the old Thatcherite policies which lead to decline in the primary sector, and sell off , of the family silverware, and creating a division between north and South . The "mess " which the coalition blames on Labour , was inherited from the previous Tory administration under John major ,and Labour did not spend enough to rectify many of the problems that it had inherited from the Tories .
Ed Miliband's job will be made slightly easier by the Lib-Dem's departure towards the wonderful pastures of free enterprise and eventual merger with the Conservative party .
During the early 1980's . apart from the labour party trying to tear itself apart due to old guard dogma , and unclear about exactly how to deal with a Tory media , who were relishing every second , Labour were crying out for new blood , which was very difficult to find , initially . Once the party got it's head around the fact that the younger generation where the party's future , they slowly began to carry out the necessary reforms needed to make the party electable once more . It is " Red Ed's" task to find out what that winning formula is , and make sure it is a long term plan , unlike the Lib-Dem's programme .
Sciamachy, you are correct, I accept to being ancient, but I still vote! As to so called music, as a lad at primary school I was always a nerd, like now, hating rock and roll, and football. However I could strip and rebuild a 4 stroke motorcycle engine aged 10,and make gunpowder. At 9 Iheld the paraffin lamp whilst the local vet calved a cow. I assure you my council primary school essays were colourful to say the least. Reading and maths were easy, but then I was taught to read by two 10 year old girls, my starting school in WW2 age 3 yrs and 2 months. Born Aug.and just another way of life.
PS Iuse my real name, I don't believe in hiding.
when eric heffer was dying of cancer,he told neil kinnock i wish it was you that was dieing you bastard,i thought was a nasty cruel thing to say bearing in mind they was both in old labour in the 80s, but what heffer was upset about was kinnock turned the old socalist labour party into new labour with the purge of the far left and the militant old labourites like derek hatton and co,now can any left winger or socalist in here call the lighter shade of blue ed millibands party labour again,i dont think so,its time for a new name change for your party and its up to you new generation of left wingers and socalists to decide the name.
Swatandra--- just maybe these noisy youngsters could start by cleaning up the dirty town. Actions before words, there are too many politicians that don't want to do real work!
So now were back into a youth 'New Generation'culture, I guess 'oldies' not wanted. But stop, the trouble is oldies have votes and there are more of them every year. What's more we hate punk music, and remember the last Labour government had the worst housing record since WW1. And then oversaw an increase of 3 million in the UK population.
Sorry but Ed is not the boy for me!
So, we move around a few old chairs, elect a new charismatic leader? I see no new beginning here, just a blast form the past, the photograph speaks volumes, young yes, overweight most, all women certainly, apparently all you need to sit on the Labour party shadow cabinet these days is to posses a Virginia.
This blog's lesser failing is that it's full of nonsense, and pretentious nonsense at that - "the true horror of the Thatcher years", oh please. The bigger problem is that it's so badly written. Laurie, you can't write. Sorry, but you can't. This is sixth form stuff.
where there is darkness there is light,where there is despair there is hope,forget the past and look forward to the future,back ed miliband,back a new generation of hope,stay with us for a brighter future.
You have an obsession with generations. It is a distraction. The issues haven't changed since I was your age (don't ask). All that matters is that we take the right steps - together.
giles.your talking a load of old pony mate,how become somebody with such a posh name like yours is a socalist,i thought your types were all torys.
Laurie I was once a young man full of ideas and idealism as were some of the people you say "saddled us with debt, tanked the economy and took us into Iraq" You'd have to have lived through the Thatcher years to fully understand just how desperate we were to see the back of the Tories.You have to understand how the party had to have appeared to have changed in the face of a media onslaught that had found it's way into the nations psyche.Yes we bent and conformed and did it their way as principles don't put a loaf of bread on the table.Good luck with the fresh start but go easy on some of those old fellas who done what they thought had to be done AT THE TIME.
http://www.billybragg.co.uk/blog/?p=54
Buckskin, my honest view seems reasonable to put to a blogger who chooses a public forum to tell the world what she thinks. But judgment on the quality of the prose is a matter of taste: if you feel differently I don't expect to persuade you. How you can say this blog is not pretentious, though...
and always remember Laurie you will need a double edged sword to fight the good fight.On one side the words must appeal to the electorate should be inscribed, no matter how ignorant,greedy and selfish they are.Unless of course your planning a revolution.
Laurie, get a grip. Tories came in on a wave of elation in 1979. New Labour came in on a wave of elation in 1997. What on earth makes you think your generation of power seekers are going to be any better?
Thatcher and New Labour had a lot in common. War. Negative equity. Economic decisions decimating livelihoods while channeling money to the rich and the elected. Over eager use of the policeman's truncheon. Politicians for sale. Mass demonstrations ignored by the government. Sending troops to die with dubious motivations.
Labour's new cohort all chose to join a City-worshipping, war-mongering, authoritarian party of spin. It's been three decades since a different kind of Labour government had power, so New Labour is all they've ever known. They chose to join it and try to get it re-elected. That is not "rampant idealism".
You say this cohort knows how to lose - and yet their reaction is to blame somebody else for it. You say they're idealistic - and yet apparently until recently they were jostling for access to power through a party whose policies and leadership they didn't like.
Sounds like a bunch of hypocritical, power hungry sycophants to me. Roll on the next exciting episode of Thatcherite / Blairite bright young things screwing everyone else over, eh?
"...most of us are far too young to remember the true horror of the Thatcher years..."
Or the mess that the 1979 Labour government left the country in it would appear.
"With the politicians who saddled us with debt, tanked the economy and took us into Iraq shuffling off into the twilight, one thing's certain: it's our turn now."
So why did many of you appear to support the party at the time? Why did nobody say "This is wrong"?
And what politicians? Ed Balls? Still there. David Miliband? Still there. Ed Miliband? Still there.
I'm all for parties growing and developing but whilst you have the likes of Ed Balls denying everything you will, imo, be unelectable.
OMG - New Labour betrayed the "yoof" by not handing the world to them on a plate. Grow up!
The problem with the NuLab aberration was not that it was a Labour administration so much as it was a continuation of the 30 years of Thatcherite neo-conservatism.
Were we saying it was wrong ? Damn right we were, I distinctly remember voting Labour in '97 and getting a conservative govt and was pretty angry about it. However, the top down authoritarianism froze out the possibility of dissenting views troubling the ruling clique's sleep. That's why so many left the party, what was the point of being involved in the continuation of economic policies I despised.
Sure there's a whiff of the old faces around, but hopefully a new task. I'm not celebrating yet, but I'm more hopeful than I've been in years.
Your time will never come. People are sick and tired of being taxed to high heaven to pay government 'projects'. Give the workers and businesses back their money. There's going to less government theft in the future... not more as you're advocating.
Most taxation equals theft by arrogant people in government. And Labour is still full of these people. You're not having my money... get your bloody own.
never mind ed and david miliband,bbc 1,9pm tomorrow, the beautiful,vivacious ann widdicombe xxx makes her first appearence on strictly come dancing.
Huh. Doesn't sound so different from the Young Conservatives party you were so scathing about a few weeks ago, Laurie: booze, flirting, and a crowd of young people with the money and connections to do internships.
HelenGB pretty well sums up my feelings on the matter, although I'm not entirely unsympathetic to Jon's argument either. Tentatively optimistic about the new leadership, certainly (as HelenGB says) "more hopeful than I've been in years", but also (like Jon) still more than a little cynical.
Sarah takes issue with the quality of Laurie's prose and yet offers us the dubious passage: "...my honest view seems reasonable to put to a blogger who...". Smoother, Sarah, to say: "Surely it's reasonable to put my honest view to a blogger who...".
Lisa - you don't a have a f*cking clue. Young Labour isn't the right wing bag carriers of Labour Students - its ordinary kids, trade unionists, apprentices, including people leading the campaign for fully paid internships so they can actually afford to do them. Aint no trustafarians in YL!
Post new comment