David Allen Green

A critical and liberal look at law and policy

Syndicate contentRSS

A step forward for privacy and dignity

Channel 4 launches a significant memorandum of understanding.

Earlier this week, Channel 4 hosted the launch of the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) which it has entered into with Trans Media Watch, an organisation set up to combat prejudiced, sensationalist, and inaccurate depictions of transgender people in the media. The MoU is a practical and constructive attempt to improve the depictions of transgender people. I was honoured to be invited to speak at this launch, alongside Lynne Featherstone MP, the excellent Lib Dem equalities minister.

But why is this important to anyone else, other than transgender people? Why have the presence of the equalities minister and a media lawyer? The reason is that the adverse treatment of transgender people by mainstream print and broadcast media has long been a scandal. Private citizens, who have made no effort to be public figures, are often suddenly subjected to humiliating features and commentary. Tabloids often carry stories involving transgender people, usually with "before and after" pictures, for no reason other than to try and entertain their readers. Television programmes commonly use transgendered people as figures of fun or ridicule.

This treatment of transgender people is thereby not a marginal issue; it is instead a general issue about media standards and the privacy of the individual. Transgender people may be undergoing intimate bodily surgery, but one would not for a moment expect others going under similarly intimate surgery to be the subject of sensationalist tabloid stories and distorted representations. Transgender people may also be negotiating sensitive relationships with family, friends and work; they may also be having counselling and have vulnerable mental states during their period of intense change; and so the last thing which they need or can cope with is sudden national exposure and sneering copy from some tabloid hack.

There is no good reason why any event becomes newsworthy just because someone involved happens to be transgendered. There is no good reason why those who happen to be going through this undoubtedly difficult process of transition and self-realisation should have their privacy and dignity attacked by any form of media.

The MoU between Trans Media Watch and Channel 4 may be a small step; but it is nonetheless a step in the direction of a more liberal society where the autonomy of the individual is placed higher the needless and often spiteful interferences of the commercial media.

 

David Allen Green is legal correspondent of the New Statesman and a practising media lawyer

11 comments

Ceredrepholve's picture

Hi! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any issues with hackers? My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing several weeks of hard work due to no data backup. Do you have any methods to stop hackers?

oldebabe's picture

This is just another example of poking around in the private doings of other people, then generalizing and sensationalizing them. The saddest part is that many people do get off on it, perhaps having nothing to think about in their own lives...?

jan frank's picture

So why just act in a decent way to some citizens - why not act in a decent way to all citizens?

C. Davey's picture

Perhaps somebody would be kind enough to explain to those of us who are ignorant in these matters what a transgender person is?

Harriet Robinson's picture

C. Davey, some resources that might be useful:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender

http://tranarchism.com/2010/11/26/not-your-moms-trans-101/

There are many others. Here is my "Top tip" from a trans ally: don't ask trans people to explain themselves - there are plenty of resources available if you're prepared to use google.

Duncan's picture

This is great. Thank you, thanks to Channel 4, and kudos to the fantastic work of TransMediaWatch.

Christine Burns's picture

As in so many varied instances, "what the public are interested in" can be mistaken for "what's in the public interest". The intimacies of trans people's lives may tick the first box but certainly don't qualify for the second.

Jess's picture

Thank you, David. You (certainly seem to) get it.

Charlie Butler's picture

Thanks, David, and thanks to all who made the MOU a reality. Here's hoping other media organizations form an orderly queue to sign!

Natacha Kennedy's picture

Nice one David. Very succinctly put, and identifying how the media has been complicit in oppression of trans people for a long time.

Latest tweets