Gilbey on Film: I'm a Girl refusenik
Why I won't be watching - or reading - any of the Stieg Larsson trilogy.
By Ryan Gilbey Published 10 November 2010 18:19
A commercially daring marketing strategy has been announced this week by the distributor Momentum Pictures. In effect, it's a cinematic loss-leader.
In an effort to whip up interest in its forthcoming thriller The Girl Who Kicked the Hornets' Nest, which is released on 26 November, Momentum is putting on free double-bills of the preceding instalments in the Stieg Larsson-adapted "Millenium" trilogy (that's The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo and The Girl Who Played with Fire). Forty-one cinemas in the UK will screen the two films this Sunday; all you need to do is claim your tickets, climb into your motorcycle leathers, hop on your bike and burn rubber in the direction of your nearest participating cinema.
Well, I say all that about leather and motorbikes but I am exactly the sort of Girl refusenik at whom this unusual promotion is aimed, so what would I know? Through a mixture of cunning and ineptitude, I have managed to miss out on the series -- can we call it a phenomenon, or has that word now gone the way of "icon"? -- in both literary and cinematic form. There was definitely a week earlier this year when I was considering reading the first book or watching the first film, but then a pair of witty writers rained on that idea before it had even become a fully-fledged plan.
First, Nora Ephron -- sparkly on the page, even if her directing (You've Got Mail, It's Complicated) lacks that same fizz -- wrote a knock-out pastiche of the series, entitled "The Girl Who Fixed the Umlaut", in the New Yorker. Even my Larsson-resistant eyes could recognise it was knock-out, merely from having watched the trailer for the first movie, and from all the time-consuming sneering I've done at commuters reading Larsson's books on trains and buses. Ephron nailed the exaggerated pomposity and forced cool that anyone will recognise from even a passing acquaintance with a potboiler:
Lisbeth Salander was entitled to her bad moods on account of her miserable childhood and her tiny breasts, but it was starting to become confusing just how much irritability could be blamed on your slight figure and an abusive father you had once deliberately set on fire and then years later split open the head of with an axe. Salander opened the door a crack and spent several paragraphs trying to decide whether to let Blomkvist in. Many italic thoughts flew through her mind. Go away. Perhaps. So what. Etc...
That alone would have been ample justification for my avoidance of all things Girl-related. Then a few weeks later, Will Self piled in after Ephron in this most amusing literary scrum. In this very magazine, he summarised Larsson's series thus: "[A] lot of tedious Swedes cutting each other to pieces." One distinguished comic writer steering me away from the Stieg Larsson section in the bookshop, or from the cinema showing a Girl movie, would have been quite enough: I'm easily swayed. But two? The damage was done.
There is undoubtedly a contrarian thrill to finding oneself out of step with a popular craze; the rise of Dan Brown has done easily as much good for half the world's feelings of superiority as it has done harm to the remaining half's vocabulary. And in a world that makes increasingly unrealistic demands on our time, there is something empowering about resisting those entertainments of which simply everyone is partaking. (I hadn't read a word of J K Rowling or seen more than one of the Harry Potter films before I was called upon to review the fifth movie for the NS. In preparation, I received a crash course from my children, but what I saw only confirmed that I had not been missing much. It's government-regulated fantasy really, isn't it? Fantasy with the corners sanded down, the fantastic sucked out.)
On-demand viewing has made that level of assertion easier; the dominance of the boxed-set is also proof that we all like to regulate our interests and obsessions, gorging on an entire season in a day or two if we so desire.
The problem Momentum is trying to address with the free Girl giveaway is to stem the fatigue that must inevitably set in among audiences when the three parts of a trilogy are released in such a short space of time (the first Girl opened here in August). At least the Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings and James Bond films typically have a year or two between each outing. But I wonder if the Girl brand isn't irrevocably tainted among the uninitiated. I doubt I'll be setting aside five hours on a Sunday to submit to a marketing campaign.
That said, I love the idea of the double-bill making a return in the form of a primer. Multiplexes might show a brace of past Palme d'Or winners to whet our appetites for the upcoming Uncle Boonmee Who Can Recall His Past Lives. Or a couple of movies set in hotels to get us in the mood for Sofia Coppola's Somewhere, which takes place largely in the Chateau Marmont.
The double-bill is a luxury in which too few cinemas indulge these days. I'm a sucker for them. But when it comes to Momentum's generous offer, I may just be washing my motorcycle leathers that day.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















5 comments
YOU MUST NOT MISS IT!!!
-------------- http://www.ftoto.com/ -----------
a leading worldwide wholesale company (or ucan say organization). We supply more than 100 thousand high-quality merchandise and famous brand name products all at wholesale prices.
-------------- http://www.ftoto.com/ -----------
I would never say that the books are classics, or the movies timeless, but to be honest neither is Lord of the Rings or many of the other books you reference. What they are is highly enjoyable fluff with a little bit of politics thrown in. Not wishing to watch them is a form of snobbery usually found in the chattering classes. Larsson infers that Lisbeth has Aspergers, hence her deemed anti-social behavior, and she's not a hero or even the central character, but probably the character that you most identify with. If you want to criticise something, you really should read/watch it.
What a smug, glib little blog! At least go and see the films or read the books. Classic second hand, lazy journalism. I have seen the movies. Not outstanding, though the Lisbeth character is quite compelling. Nora Epheron's dull,pseudo witty pastiche, is contrary for its own sake. Her ramblings on Lisbeth's body type seem to reveal Ms Ephron's own discomforts, nothing more. If Epheron can't grasp how a character who had experienced an extremely abusive home life would not be moody, reclusive, and introverted-and possibly go on to attempt to murder the abusive parent; then she must have led a sheltered life. Larsson's work has probably gotten too much praise, true, but that's popular fiction for you. Relax!
Rosalino, I agree: a person shouldn't criticise something if he/she hasn't experienced it first-hand. That's why you won't find any actual criticism of Steig Larsson's books, or the film adaptations, in the above blog; I merely wanted to highlight the factors that have proved offputting for me(e.g. Nora Ephron's brilliant pastiche: awfully hard to arrive fresh at something if you've read the pastiche first, no?)
Hooray - someone who says boxed set, not box set!!
I've been resisting the Girl products too, not being a fan of detective novels, but then I was talked into going to see the first film and I have to admit that it wasn't a total waste of time. When she tattooed the rapist everyone cheered, so that was a fun moment. I wasn't convinced when she got into bed with him because there was no chemistry between them, but they're Swedish, so it's probably compulsory. And the scenery was nice. A double bill of five hours seems a bit much though.