Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

Cultural Capital

Reflections on books and the arts from the New Statesman culture desk

Syndicate contentRSS

The Culture Secretary is wrong to knock ethnic minorities

Jeremy Hunt's comments show he does not understand the reality of art in modern Britain.

"Public money will no longer be given to arts organisations simply because they hire a high proportion of women or ethnic minorities, culture secretary Jeremy Hunt has warned," reports the Daily Mail.

And here were we at the Asian theatre company Tamasha, labouring under the misapprehension for these last 21 years that the Arts Council fund us because we stage plays the British public want to see! The implication in the minister's speech that artists such as ourselves only receive money because of our gender and race is cynical in the extreme.

The claim of a "box-ticking" approach to funding artists from Black and minority ethnic backgrounds promotes the notion that artists from minority groups are nothing but jumped-up quota-fillers. We would expect it from the Mail but when we start hearing it from the Culture secretary, it's alarming.

Hunt told the delegates at the Media Arts Festival that, "The days of securing taxpayer funds purely by box ticking - getting cash simply because a diversity target has been hit - are now over."

Under Labour, the arts were charged with challenging social exclusion, celebrating diversity and reasserting Britishness. At Tamasha, we've encountered our fair share of box-ticking theatres, wanting to collaborate with us purely to get Asian bums on their seats, but it comes with the territory. We're wise to it and don't collaborate with those theatres.

Yet the suggestion that artists of colour have been enjoying an Arts Council-funded joy ride demeans us and shows how little Hunt understands the reality on the ground.

Now that the critical pendulum is swinging away from the Arts for social ends back to the "purer" criteria of intrinsic artistic excellence, we are seeing a retrogressive new conservatism at work. After all, who decides the criteria for judging artistic excellence?

Cultural diversity is not important in and of itself, but because it allows us to contrast different values and beliefs and take positions on them. The arts offer a special forum in which to engage in political dialogue and debate that can help create a collective language of citizenship. We see that most clearly in our work in schools.

Ironically, in the very same speech Hunt urged arts organisations not to dump education outreach when the cuts come in. His headline-grabbing comments about funding women and minorities shows a lack of political and artistic vision. The box ticking was never of our choosing and nor was the labelling. Ministers come and go but we will continue to make plays with or without their interference.

Kristine Landon-Smith is co-director with Sudha Bhuchar of Tamasha Theatre Company

Tags: arts funding  Arts

7 comments

Justin's picture

Why don't you try applying to the lovely grey-beige folk at the arts council for a grant for a project honouring an English man like Elgar or Betjeman? Or for a festival celebrating English classical music? Then you really would have something to complain about. I never had the same access to arts council funding as groups who tick all the right boxes, but produce art worthy of note for nothing more than the fact that it pushed all possible diversity buttons. The great lie is that arts groups have equal access to arts council funding. If your project honours a dead white heterosexual male, you are at the back of the arts funding queue.

Lox's picture

Kristina, what's wrong with artistic excellence? What the f***? Is "excellence" intrinsically conservative? So by the same rationale, can we say that mediocrity is essentially a socialist value?
Who decides the criteria for deciding artistic excellence? Not you-the fact that you ask that question indicates that you're probably not qualified.

This is just the tired rhetoric of a navel gazing, self-obsessed clique that for some odd reason can't admit that there is excellence in some art: here's a definition, if you like. A piece of art that makes you feel that you're in the presence of something much bigger than you, something nameless and infinite, is probably excellent. Wagner is excellent, Andrew Lloyd Webber isn't. Picasso is excellent, Jack Vettriano isn't. King Lear is excellent, The Bill isn't.

June's picture

These companies have been enjoying a "free joyride." It's money for old rope. Imagine, the government gives you tax payers money and lottery money to put on your own plays and pay yourself a salary for life! How wonderful.
Time to get rid of the whole lot of these scroungers and send them off into the real world and see if they can earn a living by becoming freelance. I doubt Ms Landon - Smith (not a very ethnic sounding name?) would last five minutes.

swatantra nandanwar's picture

What Hunt fails to understand is that the Arts depend on constant interaction and fusion with different cultures. There is much that we can all learn and integrate new ideas into our own body of work.
Any Body or Institution that is not open to new ideas and change, and remains fossilsed and cocooned in its own comfort zone, is doomed to extinction, and deserves to be so.

David Vinter's picture

I then am clearly doomed, ethnic art leaves me cold, mostly it's a crashing row,mostly northwards through Africa, and almost all the muslim middle east, I switch off. On the other hand, I can listen to, and peruse Chinese and Japanese art. But then I'm a practical engineer, it's us that makes things work,spend time getting the new clean water pipeline to help eliminate disease, whilst half the earth are down on their knees praying.
It's Mozart, Newton, Einstein, Marconi, Dr Salk,and as Ovid said, the greatest man is he that can make two blades of grass grow where one grew before. Unless of course humans are going to limit their overpopulation of our tiny earth!
Throw as many brickbats as you like,I've seen poverty and I don't like it. There is no nobility starvation.

Rabyrover's picture

"Tick boxing was never of our choosing". So why are you complaining when it is going to be ended?

James's picture

Rabyrover:- for reference it said 'Box ticking' not 'Tick boxing' ...that is a minority sport involving parasites & very small gloves!

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets