Return to: Home | Blogs | Cultural Capital

Michael Moore: Q+A

The documentary-maker on capitalism, Obama and why Britain is about to get punished

This weekend, I've been watching films at Sheffield's Doc/Fest. One of the highlights so far has been Michael Moore's Capitalism: A Love Story, which Jonathan has already blogged about here. After the screening, Moore answered questions from the audience (via Skype, no less); below are a few choice excerpts.

Your film outlines the human impact of last year's financial crash. Do you have much hope that Obama can fix these problems?

You can't expect things to change overnight and there's not time in nine months to fix catastrophes left by the Bush administration. But I don't believe in the tooth fairy or Santa Claus and he might not be able to fix the problems left by Bush and Cheney.

In the UK there seemed to be more protection against the banking collapse. Why do you think the US doesn't have that protection?

For some reason as Americans we want you to be punished if you lose your job or get an illness. If you hit hard times it's at that moment that we want to be exceptionally cruel. People in America are good on an individual basis, but collectively we get angry at the world. Why do we want to punish people when they get ill? I've never really understood it.

Perhaps it's also because Americans don't know what's happening in the rest of the world. Why don't Americans travel more?

Why should we care about the rest of the world? People here aren't given a reason to care. And it's this attitude that kills creativity, kills curiosity. We don't want to know what's going on in France, Ireland, Finland; that's not surprising really seeing as we don't even care about ourselves.

I believe there is a basic goodness in people, but they've been made stupid. There are 44 million illiterate adults in the US. The media reinforces the stupidity and ignorance, which makes it very easy to manipulate people with fear. That's my country anyway, I don't know how it is in the UK when you have a Prime Minister who tells you that Iraq could fire a missile on you within 45 minutes [laughs].

What is capitalism?

Well, I can only define it as it exists today -- the same as these days you wouldn't answer the question "what is marriage?" by saying "well, it's something that happens when the groom visits the bride's father to ask permission..." In 2009 capitalism is a system of legalised greed, organised to protect the one per cent who own most of the wealth.

Is the "American Dream" -- the idea that anyone can become rich if they work hard enough -- a good thing?

I think that's what it is: a dream, not a reality for most people. These days it's more of a nightmare. In the old days you could work hard and if your boss prospered then you would prosper. Now you work hard, your boss prospers then you get sick and you lose your job.

But there are a lot of reasons people all around the world like America. There is something about our get up and go, sometimes we're full of ideas -- sometimes they're not very good ideas, sometimes they're great. My frustration is our capacity to do so much good for the world, the fact we don't do it is criminal.

You were mid-way through making the film when Obama was elected president. How did that impact on the project?

Well, I can tell you how it impacted on us as a team: 4 November 2008 was one of the happiest days we've had in decades. We could not believe our fellow citizens came through and did this. There is a lot of racism around, so just the fact that people pushed through that and chose the better person, the smarter person.

When Franklin Delano Roosevelt was elected in the 1930s, suddenly you had John Steinbeck, all this art, cinema, all these books -- we felt we were one of the first films of a new era, out of the darkness of the last 30 years. Kind of an enlightenment, that's how it feels.

I would like Roosevelt's dream of a second Bill of Rights [which would guarantee the right to a job, to education and to healthcare] to live on. When I say [in the film] that Europe has all these things, I don't mean you shouldn't have them. No system is perfect -- not even the NHS is perfect -- but you have at your core a belief that if someone gets sick they should be able to go to a doctor. So Obama gave us the feeling that maybe he will be the Roosevelt of the 21st century. We still have that hope, even after a year.

What practical advice would you give to everyday people who want to act on what they've seen in your film?

What you in the UK can do is stop being like us. All the consumption, the way we eat, the way we treat each other. What you've done in the UK, first during the Thatcher years, then during the Thatcher-lite years -- and especially your last Prime Minister -- you have copied the US and made it easier for the rich to get away with murder. You once had a system based on social democracy and you need to make sure that people still have a say.

Now you're going to have a Conservative prime minister, because people who supported Labour didn't rise up and say "enough". The UK provided a cover for Bush. Now you're going to get punished for it with a Conservative prime minister and I'm so sorry about that.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

14 comments from readers

John Booth
08 November 2009 at 15:22

"the way we eat"

I love the guy, but he can't really talk when it comes to eating, can he?

Daniele
08 November 2009 at 19:30

How refreshing to see an American not affected by "American madness" and seeing his country like it is, NOT through "Fox News" spectacles.

I love his definition of capitalism. Spot on!

brad evans
08 November 2009 at 19:41

The man preaches tolerance and diversity and valuing public schools and sends his own kid to an expensive private school that costs more than most Americans make in a year.

What you call a champagne socialist.

mount
08 November 2009 at 19:56

Yeh, Brad but no doubt he's got a wife.

Baron Pipin III
08 November 2009 at 20:06

If Obama fails, Michael must be a shoe-in for the presidency. Of the world, if possible. The man's a genius, every word he utters ought to be cast in stone, children all over the world should recite his pronouncements the way Muslim kids learn the Koran. His tacit endorsement of a second Bill of Right with the right to a job inspires so much that my eyes water. Sorry, I cannot help it. Could it be that Michael is the Jesus's second coming? It could, you know.

One truly despairs to read such deplorable comments like he's a champagne socialist. The appearance of individuals like Michael is so rare in the history of mankind. We should all stand on our knees for days of end to thank nature, and not nitpick on such trivia as education of his children, his bank account, his obesity and the rest. Come on, people, Michael's fat so that we can have more of him.

martino
09 November 2009 at 09:40

I've seen Moore's other films and have read his Stupid White Men book. They may suffer from oversimplification and he is highly selective in his examples, but his role has been (and continues to be) to spoon feed those of us who are essentially ignorant of alternatives to the prevailing Western ideologies that perpetuate the evils of Capitalism. He is indeed an entertaining teacher but believes at heart in the American Dream. As such, the 'champagne socialist' label is not, I believe, fair. He wants champagne for all!

Sheri
09 November 2009 at 17:19

He is a brilliant man; yet, I am still skeptical of Obama's motives and the way he is going about things.

As to the gentlemen who commented on "what we eat" and that MM cannot speak to this issue I say: Whom better than an overweight person to show the horrors of the food supply in this country? He is a victim of it.

As to the lady who comments that MM touts how bad our education system is yet sends his child to a private school, I say: Of course he sends his child to a private school! We have no education left in this country. If I had the money to send my child to a private school, I would. He has the money, he should and does.

Baron Pipin III
09 November 2009 at 20:55

Sheri has my vote

Dom
11 November 2009 at 08:36

He's an entertainer - a succesful film-maker. Faranheit 9/11 was good, Sicko was distinctly average. His books are repetitive and, frankly, not great. He doesn't deserve time spent discussing his Presedential credentials.

TJ_Lives
11 November 2009 at 17:18

A victim of the food supply? Nobody held a gun to his head and force-fed him. Not to my knowledge, anyway.

I'm surprised at how restrained he was in this interview. Normally he's a lot more...ranty.

That aside, he is not the second coming. He is just reiterating good ideas hatched by FDR, probably the greatest Amercan President of the 20th century. The primary difference between FDR and MM is that FDR had a strong moral backbone and didn't reduce himself to mudslinging and hypocrisy.

Oh yes, and he was intelligent.

L.Glos.
15 November 2009 at 21:31

Obnoxious little man but great for the Republicans.

Alistair Cole
17 November 2009 at 20:42

Saw all his films. Riddled with conspiracy theories and superficial analysis...then again this is typical of left wing commentators such as Michael Moore.

papigosh
18 November 2009 at 14:57

That one believes in an egalitarian society, where equality, merit and social justice is held supreme, does not mean one should be disqualified from sending ones children to a private school.

I am not expecting the one who tried to cast aspersion on MM to get the logic.

I will try again.

Because MM strives for people without insurance to be covered for every medical condition that may arise whether employed or unemployed, does not mean he (MM) should make do without medical insurance especially as he can afford it.

Got it?

papigosh
18 November 2009 at 15:22

TALKING ABOUT SIMPLIFICATION

Those who accuse MM of 'over simplification' of the issues plaguing us as a society should try to enlighten us in their 'sophisticated speak' what the following means -

Free market economy

Modernisation of public services

Quantitative easing

Private/Public Finance Initiative (PFI)

Centrist policies;

and other mumbo-jumbos quasi-intellectuals tend to rant about just to prove how cerebrally endowed they are, when it actually shows how bereft of ideas they really are.

The ability to simplify so called complex issues is the hallmark of a truely gifted person and a real teacher of men and women.

Learn to live with this.

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

A rouger shade of Palin

20 November 2009 11:35

The responsibilities of the intellectual

18 November 2009 15:39

Native spirit

18 November 2009 11:30

The man who knew too much

17 November 2009 16:51

Jailhouse rock

17 November 2009 15:56

Would Socrates have got research funding?

16 November 2009 11:46

The impact of "impact"

16 November 2009 09:44

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker