Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Glasman sticks up for Blue Labour

The Labour peer continues to promote his particular brand of anti-managerial politics.

You'd think Maurice Glasman would be all apologised out. The mea culpa seems to be a theme of this year's conference, and Glasman has one all of his own. After his comments on immigration earlier this year (when he suggested that Labour should listen to the EDL and engage with its supporters), the Labour peer and close friend to Ed Miliband was heavily criticised. Since then, Glasman has ladled out remorse, including in the pages of the New Statesman and now in conversation with Channel 4's Gary Gibbon at the Labour Party conference in Liverpool's ornate town hall.

Though many have called time on Glasman's "Blue Labour" project, he continues to promote his particular brand of populist, anti-managerial politics. Today, he offered yet another definition: Blue Labour is "the way people come together to protect people and places they love from exploitation". One of the chief exploiters, says Glasman, is the market, and he's clear that his is a view shared by the Labour leader who believes that "the market humiliates people". Ed Miliband is a "socialist, an intellectual" and loves to talk" about all these ideas in depth. (Glasman quickly regrets the "socialist" line - during questioning from the clutch of lobby journalists present, he clarifies that Miliband is "really a social democrat".)

On the subject of the leadership, he admits that it is taking time for Miliband to find his feet and that recovering from the bruising, family contest for the top job has been a long process. When asked if Miliband had been grieving for his elder brother, Glasman is cagey but concedes that it has "taken a year to find his energy". Glasman, who is friends with both brothers, says that Ed coped "a lot better than I did" with the fall-out. But still, it is only now, thanks to the Murdoch hacking scandal, that he thinks we are starting to see the leader's true abilities, and the "angry insurgent side" of his politics.

Glasman's own position in politics is ambiguous - he is a Labour peer, an academic and evidently still close to the leadership although he says that he maintains a distance and independence from Miliband ("I don't want to overstate my role," he insists). He points to issues, such as higher education (Glasman would like to halve the number of universities, and boost vocational institutions), where his own views differ dramatically from those of the leader. Perhaps he is keen to avoid the fate of Red Tory thinker Philip Blond, who as Gary Gibbon points out, was "lost on journey" by the Conservatives. "I am no pet intellectual," Glasman says, and in any case the ongoing conversation between him and Miliband has been "characterised by argument, so we're unlikely to fall out". At least they're talking: he laughingly mentions that he'd be keen to discuss policy with Ed Balls "who keeps telling me he's going to give me a ring, but it never happens".

As for the House of Lords, Glasman says it can be "lonely at times" - he has not grown up in the political system so doesn't have long friendships with his colleagues. His friends are the staff who work in the library and canteen. And while he loves the place, he wants it to change - believing that the Lords should represent the work of the population in the same way that the Commons represents us geographically. In a classic bit of Glasmanese, he describes his idea as the "vocational House" alongside the "locational House". Perhaps that's another one which Miliband will gently ignore.

Tags: Party Conferences 2011  Blue Labour  Labour

13 comments

Highlandet's picture

Arturo

I agree.New Labour abandoned the likes of us a long time ago

John P Reid's picture

Arturo and highandet, goodbye, i'm sure you can find a home in the socialist workers party.

John P Reid's picture

black triangle campaign ,i've never said i agreed with glasman ,and i've never said i'm going anywhere, and glasman is the one the labour leadership likes

Mrs.Josephine Hyde-Hartley's picture

Yes well everyone's entitled to at least and opinion - so "vocational House" seems like a good nick name for the Lords, I daresay. Providing of course we don't end up with the second House being totally elected -the concept of a vocational Lords has a certain ring to it, I think. Thus the "locational House" in modern trendy parlance might indicate the power of the Commons in terms of where it's at, so to speak ie embedded in those to whome our M.P's are first accountable and responsible to (and for) - if only they had a proper job description.

Get it?

Luddite's picture

As with the Mohammadian and Christian religion, the worst advertisement for Socialism is its adherents. Isn't it Arturo Bandini.

Luddite's picture

Labour needs the Blue collar workers, but the Blue collar workers don't need Labour.

Robert Taggart's picture

Glasman can stick it up Blue Liebore.
Because of his beloved NuLiebore UKGBNI be having the 'blues' !

Hugh Markey's picture

A fair proportion of the Labour vote has always considered how to cast its vote on an economic basis.
It is only fear of the Tories that motivates this highly volatile rump of voters to choose Labour. Very grudgingly.
Most of the clientele of British Workingmen's Clubs that we met over the years held racist, anti-women, and not far-off fascist views. Even public sector workers of our acquaintance were always anxious to escape to the private sector or start a small enterprise.
Pro-empire and Royalist to a man.
However, when it came to knowing which side their bread was buttered on you had no problem.
In spite of this economic certainty, a small war a la the Falklands, Suez or now Libya, and all bets are off.
The natural working-class Tory has always existed but since the coming of women workers in numbers this element has been reduced.
It took the Tories some time to realise that that death-grip of a mortgage inclined holders of this debt to vote the right way. Apparently the Tories were afraid of upsetting their middle-class voters. The spread of pensions to workers at large, and not just pen-pushers, was motivated by the same reasoning. Then council-housing!
And now the landlord is back - big-time. Ex-council housing is going at a discount and former occupiers, tenants transformed into householders, are selling to aspirational buyers cum landlords. Of course, in some cases the owner of the ex-council house is not the original tenant who once held a tenancy agreement with the local council. No, a blood relative, in-law or speculator more likely. There have been private tenancies for some time and housing authorities have even been forced to lodge the homeless in such premises.
Fortunately, well-to-do parents are purchasing starter homes for their offspring in such localities. Keeps the standard on the up. Some local psephologists advise us that these young householders either do not vote or vote Tory - a wasted vote?

Chav

Didymus's picture

Oh dear, when "socialism" has become a dirty word for the "Not so much Labour as Big Business" Party, things are really dire. In running away from European socialism we've run straight into the situation described here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/04/opinion/sunday/jobs-will-follow-a-stre...

Barry Ewart's picture

Blue Labour a "mixture of patriotism and populism." Patriotism, "The last refuge of a scoundrel" - Oscar Wilde. Populism, "The first refuge of opportunism." - Anon. Blue Labour r 'The Cling Ons' clinging on 2 New Labour. Time for Progressive Labour.

Black Triangle Campaign's picture

John P Reid
26 September 2011 at 17:56
"Arturo and highandet, goodbye, i'm sure you can find a home in the socialist workers party."

I'M SURE YOU & GLASMAN can find a nice home in the TORY 'REFORM' CLUB as so-called "One Nation" TORIES!

john woods's picture

Hugh Markey says:

"Most of the clientele of British Workingmen's Clubs that we met over the years held racist, anti-women, and not far-off fascist views."

Translated into English, this means "(a) Most working class males know instinctively what the more educated pretend they don't know: that men and women have different capabilities and different roles.

(b) It was the inner city working class, not the Polly Toynbees and Tony Benns of this world and the other over privileged bourgy leftie denizens of Hampstead , who were were turned into strangers in their own country by mass immigration, and object to this fact

Even public sector workers of our acquaintance were always anxious to escape to the private sector or start a small enterprise.

Pro-empire and Royalist to a man.

Arturo Bandini's picture

Sick of the supposed shame of being a socialist.

God forbid someone's political motivation should be to build a better, more equitable world for their children to inhabit.

No, much better to be an intellectual-Luddite, selfish NIMBY Tory, or a thieving, murdering NeoCon.

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets