Return to: Home | Blogs | Caroline Lucas

A Living Wage for Britain

During Blog Action Day, the Green Party advocates for raising the minimum wage to a living wage to tackle poverty in the UK

I'm writing this late on Wednesday - Blog Action Day 2008 - and bloggers all over the world are posting on the subject of poverty. The poverty crisis in less developed countries - and Europe's crucial place in that as one of the causes and one of the main potential solutions - forms a large part of my work as an MEP. I've crossed swords many times with the now Baron Mandelson of Foy and Hartlepool, who as European Trade Commissioner was very much in the 'problem' camp, and was delighted this week to be named MEP of the Year for Trade. But in this Blog Action Day post I'd like to look at solutions to poverty closer to home. People in the UK don't generally think of themselves as being in poverty, but many thousands are.


Total up the absolute basic living costs that families need to cover, and you get what’s known as a poverty threshold wage – and every study finds this to be already higher than the minimum wage set by the government.


But a real ‘living wage’ must also provide a secure margin so that the family involved does not fall into poverty and debt when it faces the kind of day-to-day challenges those of us who are better off can take in our stride: a broken kettle, the need to buy shoes for a growing child, the cost of a train journey to visit a sick relative.


The absolute minimum needed for a basic existence, calculated by this approach, shows that the minimum wage falls well short of what’s needed. More than a pound an hour short in fact. Every calculation of a living wage that has been done in towns and cities in the UK has found a living wage this year lies above seven pounds an hour. But from October this year, the minimum wage is just £5.73.


This means that anyone receiving the minimum wage is receiving poverty wages. And in 21st century Britain this is just not on.


If the Greens were in government, the national minimum wage would be set at least at the level of a real living wage. But meanwhile, we're pledged to use every piece of influence we can get to fight poverty pay.


In 2007, the lowest paid workers in the London Fire Brigade got a pay rise. Previously the people who clean fire stations were paid the national minimum wage, at that time just £5.35 per hour. But thanks to the work of the London Living Wage Unit, this changed and now the cleaners earn at least the London living wage of £7.45 an hour, enough to support themselves and their families at last.


What many people don’t know is that the Living Wage Unit was set up under Ken Livingstone’s administration thanks to the Green Party members of the London Assembly, Jenny Jones and Darren Johnson.


They held a casting vote over the Mayor’s budget for four years and used it to get a fair deal for all London government’s employees, and create the Living Wage Unit to calculate the amount needed to get by in the capital.


While they don’t have the same influence over the new Mayor, Greens in London are continuing to support the efforts of groups such as London Citizens, the Fair Pay Network and The East London Communities Organisation fighting for fair pay for cleaners, shop staff and catering and hotel workers across London.


In Oxford, Greens have also succeeded in passing a motion through the city council, bringing in a living wage for council workers there. But when the Greens brought the same motion to Oxfordshire County Council this June, the Liberal Democrats and Conservatives shamefully voted it down.


In Lewisham, the six strong Green Group is proposing a living wage for all council employees, and are proposing extending this to all council contractors as well. And our Deputy Leader, Adrian Ramsay (who is also taking part in Blog Action Day) defeated Conservative opposition to commit Norwich City Council to the principle of the Living Wage.


Over the next months, Greens all over the country will be following the example of Oxford, London, Lewisham and Norwich Green Parties. They will be campaigning hard so that millions more of the lowest paid workers in Britain get a decent wage.


The Greens have spent a long time being right about things like this, but pushed to the political margins. It makes me so proud that as we win more and more elections, we refuse to rest on those laurels but use that influence to make real changes in the lives of ordinary people who have also been marginalised by the establishment parties.


So next time you're tempted to think of the Greens as a single-issue party, ask a Fire Brigade cleaner.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

13 comments from readers

Carl Jones
17 October 2008 at 00:02

Caroline

The reason why the poor stay poor is the family tax credit and child benefit. both of these allow employers to pay low wages.....thats right, Mr Businessman pays himself a large salary, lives in a nice house in a low crime area, drives a huge 4x4, the wife has a bus for the kids and the go to a private school....all this and 2/3 holidays outside the UK......

.....he affords this, because he is indirectly subsidized by the government....so he pays (lol) little attention to the economic welfare of his employees.

Middle England really does live off the fat of the land.

Its does no good looking a simple numbers.....pensioners get screwed by having their pensions linkes to RIGGED inflation numbers......the minimum wage works the same way. Since the minimum wage, inflation has outstriped it by a stagering margin....many working people would rather not go to work.....because pay has become an insult.

You greens are in bed with the corporations, the same corporations who have clobbered the buying power (living standards) of Western workers so they could carry out their globalisation scam.....hardly very green.

Theo Blackwell
17 October 2008 at 16:00

Opposition Labour and Green councillors have pressed the point about the Living Wage at Camden council, but the officers are keen to argue that such an approach would be "illegal", despite tne Mayor of London (Ken/Boris) advocating the approach Have you come across any other examples of local authorities using this argument?

PeterCranie
17 October 2008 at 16:45

@Carl - you say that "greens are in bed with the corporations". You have absolutely no evidence for this, because none exists. We are stringent about who we do and don't take donations from.

If you want to make assertions like that, you have to back them up, otherwise people will dismiss all the points you've made as misinformation and sniping.

Cassandra
17 October 2008 at 18:07

@PeterCranie

Why are you wasting your time attempting to debate with ‘Carl Jones’?

He wraps up his nuggets of counterfactual piffle in a deliberately condescending prose style.

It is my opinion that he can *only* be doing this in order to elicit an emotional response from other readers; that he is doing it "for the lulz".

i.e. from what I've seen of ‘him’ on here, ‘he’ is a textbook example of a Troll and, by replying to him, you are only encouraging him to continue his bandwidth-wasting self-amusement.

I just wish that this forum enabled users to place certain individuals on an ‘Ignore’ list.

Carl Jones
18 October 2008 at 13:41

PeterCranie; I didn`t imply financial collusion.

CASSANDRA; we live in testing times which is imparting a certain amount EMOTIONAL grief.

YOU are clearly a green as you having NOTHING to add to what (sweeeet) Caroline has said in her article and for that matter, what I have said in my comment.

There is NS article called "Guided by an Invisible Hand" by Joseph stiglitz. There is a reply to one of my comments, its written by "amanfromMars"....many years ago we both posted on the BBC Radio Today message boards. For most of my time there, I was placed under pre-moderation. I still have 100`s of emails from the BBC because my posts were censored....I didn`t break the house rules, apart from the odd reply to people like YOU.LOL Eventually, the Today message board became a censored forum where you had to submit topics for approval, I left this forum for the BBC Radio 5 Live messaage boards, but was soon banned....thats right, pay my licence fee, but am banned from all BBC message boards and comment sections. I personally destoryed several government lies using MSM evidence.....I had posts censored because I used links to US MSM articles on the Bush elections....the BBC censored MSM article which were published in the US.LOL

Sure Cassandra, I did all this for attention....I and many other have exposed MI5`s involvement in 7/7. Or the NWO`s attempt to crash a CIA 747 onto London...questions were asked in the HoC.LOL I even sent No10 an email detailing the attempted assassination of Gordon Brown at LHR in January 2008.....full contact details were supplied...I`ve not heard a thing for reporting this serious CRIME!LOL

I was once asked by a BBC Newsnight producer to talk about crime, I declined, I said that you (he/the BBC) wouldn`t show what I had to say about the ""CRIME CONSTRUCT".LOL I was as the Dome for the Millenium exhibition, I was asked to comment by one TV crew, I declined, I told them they would be allowd to show what I had to say.LOL (continued)

Carl Jones
18 October 2008 at 14:07

Most of our newspapers have a facility to comment on some of their articles....I appear to be banned on all of them, including many in the US....I wonder, what are they so firghtened of.LOL

Anyway, returning to "amanfromMars", he left this link in one on his comments to NS "Guided by an Invisible hand" by Joseph Stiglitz.

http://tiny.cc/CsBU0

http:/tiny.cc/CsBUO

one will work. LOL

I you read this article you will see that the writter is puzzled by the fact that "hemp" is illegal to grow in the US....this and Flax are greeeen wonder crops....yet the corporate/political and greens maintain the NWO construct....like you greens are really CONCERNED.LOL

The worlds largest cruise ship visited Southampton before setting sail (lol) for Florida. The MSM were full of articles trying to get people to work out their carbon foot print, but not one negative word was uttered by the MSM.greens towards the GROWING cruise line business. This is what I mean when I say the greens are in bed with the corporations. Sure CASSANDRA, I only do it for the attention, so please don`t waste my time or attempt to hijack the debate.LOL If anyone is a Troll, its YOU! LOL

explodingbadger
20 October 2008 at 01:54

@Carl Jones

LOL LOL LOL

About the article: Yes companies should be forced to pay a living wage. Noone should be exploited in this day an age. If I vote I vote green, no point voting labour anymore.. turned out worse than the tories.

Carl Jones
20 October 2008 at 13:50

explodngbadger; is this the best you can do?

Saying "living wage" means nothing. Its what it can buy. How about a rule which says no one can earn less than 40% of the UK average wage. If you greens are going to talk about serious issues, then at least come out with some serious policies on low pay.

gnuneo
21 October 2008 at 02:09

a fully comprehensive policy? (although i support the 'living wage' policy as a stop-gap).

take the MODE average wage in the UK, and then put a cap of this x20 (or less). Above this figure the tax rate is 100% (or more). The only way for the wealthy to get their high incomes, is to ensure that wages *across the board* increase. People who do not believe in altruism/compassion, can still be pressured by positive tax legislation to simulate such personal development.

it is grotesque that in a modern democracy, we are once again heading towards guarded mansions, with hordes of starving Britons begging outside the gates for a crust of bread after long hours of work.

taghioff.info
30 October 2008 at 11:18

Proportional representation and coalition governments allow Green parties in somewhere like Sweden to concentrate on green issues, whilst being part of a socially progressive coalition.

I like the ideas presented here, and I think that Green political philosophy can add up to a complete political program, but the dilution of the political message of the Green party, and the public perception of them as a single issue party work against them in a first past the post system.

But I am sure they are aware of that...

taghioff.info
19 November 2008 at 10:11

And if you are on the topic of poverty, poor people tend to live outside the cash economy (that is what a PPP dollar a day really means.)

It follows that they live off of the environment. Which means that as a Green, you should probably be campaigning for minimum living footprint, as an extension of the right to life.

avrilp
24 November 2008 at 10:53

Sadly many of the policies supported by the Green party along with the anti 4x4 alliance for have directly contributed to this recession, especially the motor industry. The increases in road tax has all but forced the Motor industry to grind to a halt. Campain for a iving wage, how dare you. The blood of the British motor industry will be on your hands just as much as it is on Gordon Browns.

scientific earthling
11 December 2008 at 04:30

I like to refer to the current financial meltdown as the xGreed bust. The X is short for executive. Executive salaries were out of control, governments worldwide failed to act. Executives believed they were untouchable.

Executives got higher wage packages for increasing profit. This was easy to do by discarding basic principles of financial management.

The banks were the first to have their indiscretions come back to bite them. They tried to cover their losses by increasing interest rates and started to look at the loans they had issued to business. As banks demanded higher rates from borrowers who did not have sufficient assets to back their loans, the borrower could not pay the interest and we had corporate collapses. This further reduced the capital of the banks, more grabbing at straws.

Most investors with real money only received mediocre returns. Company executives in banks and other businesses received a king’s ransom.

Will investors ever be in a position to sue executives whom they trusted to run their business with due diligence for a modest return to themselves? I don’t think so.

Will the governments act? I don’t think so.

Historically the rapists and plunderers of the world have always been the most successful people of the world.

Now you talk of a living wage! I don't like your chances.

Immigration exists to lower wages for the masses.

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

'Hoon is the real vandal'

09 December 2008 09:18

A Green New Deal?

07 October 2008 10:32

Taking a lead

01 September 2008 15:38

Provocative policing

07 August 2008 14:04

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Blogroll

Vote!

Was the government wrong to sack David Nutt?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker