Return to: Home | Culture

Art attack

Peter Kennard

Published 17 January 2008

Banksy attracts the press attention, but around him is an increasingly influential movement of political artists operating outside the mainstream

The phone rings; the number is withheld. It's Banksy. He wants to know whether I can go to Bethlehem over Christmas. He is putting on an exhibition, bringing together like-minded artists from all over the world to raise awareness of the situation in Palestine. Like the annual guerrilla art shows that have taken place in London for the past six years, it will be called "Santa's Ghetto". Two weeks later, I find myself involved in an experience that transforms my ideas about what artists can do in the face of oppression.

We are living through an exciting time for political art. I have been an artist for 40 years, and my work has always focused on political and social issues. In the 1970s, I started making photo montage work, drawing on imagery from the Vietnam War and the row over nuclear armaments (a retrospective opens at the Pump House Gallery this month). Since the build-up to the Iraq War in 2002, I have been collaborating with a younger artist, Cat Picton Phillipps, developing new techniques and using digital technology to expose the lies that led to the invasion and the subsequent humanitarian disaster.

Over this period, our work has become linked to a group of young artists who work outside the official art world. Most of them started out painting graffiti on walls. The central figure in this group is Banksy, but although he attracts most of the press coverage, he is surrounded by a growing band of talented, politically committed artists. Our associates come from Spain and Italy, the US, Britain and Palestine. Since the era of the Bush/Blair war in Iraq, this movement has become increasingly politicised, just as my generation was politicised by the war in Vietnam. These are artists who want to connect with the real world, rather than work for the market, which has more of a stranglehold on art than ever. They combine creativity with protest, insisting that art should be more than the icing on the cake for the super-rich.

We arrived in Bethlehem with four fellow artists: Blu, an Italian who has painted on walls from Bologna to Buenos Aires; Sam3, from Spain; the long-standing Banksy collaborator Paul Insect, from Britain; and Gee Vaucher, another Brit and the only other artist of my generation. The rest are all in their thirties and come from street-art backgrounds. All of them are well informed about the Middle East and came to Bethlehem to show their solidarity with the Palestinians.

Banksy had been to the West Bank a number of times to paint on the Separation Wall. He knows and understands the situation and had a team of focused, sussed people working with him. They found a disused fast-food joint in Manger Square and managed to rent it. The idea was to show a combination of western and Palestinian artists. The art was available to buy on site only, so if you wanted to get hold of the latest Banksy or any of the other artworks, you would have to travel to Bethlehem to place a bid. This was important, because Bethlehem is being starved of its tourist trade as visitors are bussed in to see the Church of the Nativity and bussed out an hour later back to Israel. All proceeds from the sale, which exceeded $1m, went to local charities.

For our contribution, Cat and I decided to print a dollar bill across 18 sheets of the Jerusalem Post, ripped through to expose images of pre-Naqba Palestine. The pictures show the richness of Palestine's history and the diversity of its culture - a sobering antidote to the stereotype of a violent, irrational people that we so often see on the news. We wanted to make the work in Bethlehem because taking finished pieces over would be difficult, given Israel's heavy and ever-changing restrictions on what and who can travel in to the Palestinian territories.

We teamed up with a group of Palestinians, who helped to get hold of materials and sort out logistics. They also gave us all a window on life in the West Bank, with looming Israeli settlements and endless checkpoints. Every night we would pile into a kebab restaurant, where we would drink and dance, arguing over and discussing that day's work. One night over dinner, the Palestinians recounted how they had been held and tortured by the Israeli authorities while they were still in their mid-teens. It was extraordinary how welcoming they were to this motley band of artists. All the privations and restrictions have only increased the Palestinians' resilience and their desire to communicate with the outside world.

Through these friends we found a commercial printing house in Hebron, which got involved in sorting out our highly unconventional printing needs. This involved printing a giant dollar across many sheets of newspaper and also making a giant print to plaster on the Separation Wall. The printers immediately committed their time and energy to the project, and ended up printing for Banksy and the other artists.

Through this process of making, the people of Bethlehem became involved in what the work was saying. After we pasted our picture on the wall, we went for tea in the cafe opposite. The cafe owner, whose business has been destroyed by the wall, told us he appreciated the statement we had plastered on to the cement that he has to stare at every day of his life.

Sticking up a poster or painting the Separation Wall in the West Bank might sound inconsequential, but these are highly practical ways to help, in contrast to the intellectual interventions prevalent in much contemporary art. They contribute to a town and a people that are having their lifeblood strangled out of them.

In this context, it is important that the work communicates directly to the Palestinian people. While there has been a move to take on contemporary issues in a direct way in the theatre, in visual art the idea still holds that if you have something to say about the world, you have to hide it behind theory and obscurity. It sometimes seems that Britain's art colleges turn out experts in camouflage, rather than fine art.

The pressure of world events is so great that it is increasingly difficult to sustain the idea of art for art's sake. Radical art and politics converge in times of crisis, and that is happening now. I know, from my experience as a tutor at the Royal College of Art and at the University of the Arts in London, that the ironies of the Nineties YBA movement are now a thing of the past. Many art students and young artists are searching for ways to make a direct connection between their awareness of how things are in the world and their own art practice.

This involves thinking about not only the form of the art itself, but also the process of making. There are many collaborations taking place across media and disciplines, and artists are looking for new methods of distribution.

Unlike in my youth, there is no organised "left" into which artists can slot, but there is a concrete wall, 425 miles long, and we can turn it into an international canvas of dissent.

"Uncertified Documents", a retrospective of work by Peter Kennard, opens at the Pump House Gallery, Battersea Park, London SW11 on 30 January. For more information, log on to: www.wandsworth.gov.uk/gallery

Four to watch

Blu burst on to the public-art scene after the success of his contributions to the "Urban Edge" show in Milan in 2005. His reputation is built on expansive, surreal, often aggressive wall and pavement murals. Though renowned for his playfulness, acclaimed pieces from 2007, such as Fantoche in Switzerland, Letter A in New York and Reclaim Your City in Berlin, have a more macabre tone.

Suleiman Mansour co-founded al-Wasiti Art Centre in east Jerusalem, which he now directs, and went on to lead the New Vision artists' group, which proved influential during the first intifada. A pioneer of resistance art, Mansour makes work that revolves around the Palestinian struggle. He was head of the League of Palestinian Artists for four years, and won the Nile Award at the 1998 Cairo Biennale as well as the Palestine Prize for the Visual Arts the same year. He is famous for using locally sourced materials, such as mud and henna, in his pieces.

Sam3 (Samuel Marín) comes from Granada in southern Spain, where his ephemeral long, black silhouettes haunt the cityscape. Famous works include his 12 Shadows project for AlterArte and the iconic Erase Yourself, a silent protest against the civic legal authorities for removing graffiti in Barcelona.

Paul Insect is a London-based ex-designer whose pioneering of "steampunk", a mixture of Gothic Victoriana and futuristic themes, has proved popular with the British arts intelligentsia. In July last year, Damien Hirst bought his entire "Bullion" show at the Lazarides Gallery in Soho. His painting Unicorn sold for an estimated £24,500 at Sotheby's last month.

Ben du Preez

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

11 comments from readers

Maher
24 January 2008 at 01:35

Dear Peter Kennard

Your article about what artists can do in the face of oppression based on your trip to the Palestinian West Bank with Bansky and other freedom loving artists is illuminating and timely. The artists you mention restore one's faith in the necessity of art where and when it is needed as a potent form of resistence against oppression, brutality and occupation of one people by another.

Maher Othman

Maher
24 January 2008 at 01:40

Peter Kennard,s article about what artists can do in the face of oppression based onhis trip to the Palestinian West Bank with Bansky and other freedom loving artists is illuminating and timely. The artists he mentions illustrates what artists can do to highlight the plight of people who are victims of oppression, brutality and long occupation.

Maher Othman

Ron
24 January 2008 at 07:01

What a strange article. Stranger yet that all those artsts who "know the situation" have, in fact, no idea what is going on. They seem not to know about Palestinian suicide bombers who terrorized Israelis young and old. They seem not to know that the "Separation Wall" was put up in order to stop those suicide attacks. It seems to have worked. What a shame that the artists are not inclined to highlight the plight of of victims on the other side. Sad, very sad, that artists are not open enough to find out what is going on. But why should they? It is so much easier to swallow than to learn.

Evo
24 January 2008 at 19:07

"the plight of victims on the otherside" (?) - what a shame that "Ron" is not open enough to find out the true disproportionality of the situation or inclined to discover that this is the 4th largest war system in the world fighting against a group of the world's poorest, most marginalised and ill equipt citizens - with the greatest powers in the world continuously representiing and defending Israel, these artists are brave enough to defend the undefended - strange yes, in a world overflowing with cowards.

ronen
24 January 2008 at 22:58

"Art not too different from the Christian kitsch in the souvenir shops, simplistic political messages and insensitivity to the local population? Banksy and his celebrity street art posse celebrate Christmas in Bethlehem"

review of the show in Maarav: http://www.maarav.org.il/classes/PUItem.php?lang=ENG&id=1064

ellen
31 January 2008 at 05:16

Please view Phil Hensan's illuminating work

philinthecircle.com

Van Gough
03 February 2008 at 01:14

Banksy and his mates were not all welcomed by the natives on their visit . Indeed, one of his so-called works of art was covered up by the locals because it caused them offence. Something to do with donkeys!

But Banksy isn't the only artist making an ass of himself. Kennard isn't bad either. Take this statement for example -

"there is a concrete wall, 425 miles long"

He's wrong about that and any visitor to the region will tell you that the barrier is a wall in only a few places i.e. where Palestinian snipers used to have sufficient cover to fire directly at the men, women and children on the other side. The rest of the length of the barrier is made out of wire fences and other material - not concrete. It's obvious that Kennard has not put an ounce of research into the article and has not seen the greater proportion of the length of the barrier. It's equally obvious that he doesn't care just as long as he can exploit those on both sides in order to produce his piece of artistic agitprop.

MMAUS
05 February 2008 at 02:02

Congratulations on a fantastic piece Mr. Kennard. It does not surprise me in the least that the detractors have come our punching with the usual rhetoric about the sufferings of the Israelis. Did they for one second contemplate what 60 years of brutal occupation has done to the Palestinians? I think not. Please keep up your brave work and pass on our heart-felt thanks to the other artists who choose to support Palestine in the face of these blatantly scurrilous attacks.

A Palestinian in Diaspora – Melbourne, Australia

billparry
17 March 2008 at 11:31

This is a response to several of the above who wrongly criticise Peter Kennard's excellent article.

Ron: the Separation Wall's primary purpose is not to provide security but to grab another 10.1% of the Palestinian West Bank and to create another fact on the ground. Arguments that the the Wall's raison d'etre has to do with security were demolished by, among others, a comprehensive analysis called 'Under the guise of security', published by Israeli human rights groups Bimkom and B'tselem - http://www.btselem.org/Download/200512_Under_the_Guise_of_Se...

Anyone who travels to Palestine to see the course of the Wall and how it cuts through and separates Palestinian communities in order to 'protect' Israel's 450,000 illegal settlers living in the West Bank will quickly understand the true primary purpose of the Wall. Israel’s settlements are illegal under international law. The Wall was deemed illegal by the International Court of Justice's Advisory Opinion in 2004. If the illegal settlements were dismantled, there would be no need to build the wall on so much Palestinian land or to protect Israeli settlers – the Wall sticks to the 'Green Line' or 1949 Armistice Line for just 20% of its route and cuts deep into the West Bank for 80% of its course, swallowing prime agricultural land and important aquifers in its wake. Coincidence? Forcing injustice after injustice upon Palestinians, in flagrant breach of international law, is what ultimately undermines Israel’s security concerns.

Van Gough: Having just returned from Bethlehem, which involved speaking to dozens of locals about the work by Peter Kennard and others, I heard no dissent. All were grateful for the visit by these artists and the work they created. All of the Western artists openly admitted that there had been a few minor cultural sensitivities in a few cases. One of the Palestinian artists who participated in Santa’s Ghetto, Suleiman Mansour, told me that virtually all Bethlehemites appreciated the project, the $1m it raised for local charities, the international awareness it captured, and the art it produced. Local taxi drivers now offer ‘Banksy tours’. They are certainly not complaining.

The term 'Wall' is that used for the entire structure by the International Court of Justice: "the 'wall' in question is a complex construction, so that that term cannot be understood in a limited physical sense." (Para. 67) Opting for the terminology employed by the General Assembly in its request, the Court remarked that "the other terms used, either by Israel ('fence') or by the Secretary-General ('barrier'), are no more accurate if understood in the physical sense." (http://www.asil.org/insights/insigh141.htm#_edn1)

Baylasan
17 March 2008 at 11:35

Dears Van Gough and Ron,

First, for your knowledge, what physical construction aiming at surrounding the West Bank and not only the west Bank, but encircles few cities inside the West Bank and creates a reality worse than the South African Apartheid Bantostans, is a 8 meters high cement wall, so could this be called a barrier??!!

Barrier is defines as: A structure, such as a fence, built to bar passage.

What is been built in the West Bank can be called anything but not a fence, and it dose not bar passage, it imprisons a whole nation behinds it, BARRING their access to health, education, clean water, their owned land that they cultivate, social continuity and air and view.

If we want to accept Israel's claim to security, which is always used as an excuse to suppress and oppress the more than 4 million people, suppress them, and confiscate and control their land natural resources, lets say we accept that excuse, so why its built deep inside the West Bank and not on the Green Line, by that confiscating and annexing more of 47% of the West Bank to Israel. When completed the Wall will be around 450 miles long, more than double the length of the Green Line.

The UN Special Rapporteur has expressed that the main purpose of the Wall is not security but the incorporation of settlements to Israel. Please check the UN Economic and Social Council, 3rd March 2005. These settlements where built in violation of the international law, and built up on Palestinian confiscated land, with major construction of Jews only roads.

The Wall cuts off more than 200,000 Palestinians in East Jerusalem alone from the rest of the West Bank.

The Wall confiscates the most agricultural fertile land north of the West Bank, where more than 50% of the vegetables supply used to come from, making the Palestinian population more dependent on Israeli market. So Israel dose not only destroy Palestinian agriculture, it also benefits from this destruction.

So please check your facts before you make any statements,

And finally, Israel is in a way, doing to the Palestinians what Van Gouch tried to say in his famous painting the Prisoners Round, so my dear van Gough, you don't do justice to the artists of you use his name and don't hold his criticism to systems of oppression.

zeeisrael
17 March 2008 at 22:20

Excellent article about the raising awareness of the horrendous inflicted to the Palestinians by the Israeli Occupation Forces. The Wall is illegal under international law. If the Israelis wanted to build a wall, they should build on the Green line like any good neighbour would do. The Apartheid Wall is there to protect illegal settlers and is being used to steal more Palestinian land. Israel is an Apartheid state, a state for a specific ethnic group, and the Palestinians are being ghettoised. Down with Apartheid, yes to Human Rights and true equalities between Israelis and Palestinians.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Vote!

Was the government wrong to sack David Nutt?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker