
The costs of Labour’s growth boosterism
The Chancellor now understands that the politics of her role are as important as the economics.
ByNew Times,
New Thinking.
The Chancellor now understands that the politics of her role are as important as the economics.
ByDespite her rhetoric, the Chancellor doesn’t always put higher GDP first.
ByOr is it just another win for the attention economy?
ByBond market traders should not be trusted with the fate of a Labour chancellor.
ByClimate catastrophe, tech bros kissing Trump's ring, and a flailing British economy... maybe it would be better to ignore it…
ByThe Chancellor is caught between the neo-Croslandites and the neo-Blairites.
ByBritain is living through a technological revolution. Labour cannot afford to panic on the economy.
ByMinisters wrongly believed that ending the Tory psychodrama would be enough to boost the economy.
ByThe Chancellor can’t afford more bad news.
ByWhen do “efficiency savings” become cuts?
ByThe Chancellor aims to argue that her tough economic medicine has worked.
ByThe Chancellor is pushing through bold and inventive reforms but the wider picture for Britain’s economy is far from rosy.
ByHealth needs that aren’t met in primary care simply turn up in secondary care.
ByBond traders’ response to the Budget will act as a future constraint on higher public spending.
ByWere Labour's tax rises planned all along, or did the Tories force its hand?
ByPoor economic growth could force Rachel Reeves to choose between cuts and more tax rises.
ByHaving raised taxes and spending, Labour must now deliver improved services.
ByThe Chancellor’s £40bn tax rises have thrown down a challenge to business.
ByThe biggest revenue-raising item in the Budget will be paid for by employees.
ByThe Chancellor will use her Budget to tax and borrow far more than originally planned.
By