Support 100 years of independent journalism.

Advertorial feature by London Tech Week
  1. Spotlight
3 September 2020updated 09 Sep 2021 1:51pm

Regulate tech to realise the benefits

Policymakers must keep pace with the advancement of artificial intelligence.

By Elliot Wellsteed-Crook

When it comes to industry regulation, the story normally goes that after years of self-regulation or no regulation there is a scandal that kicks regulators into shape. When it comes to artificial intelligence, that is not an option. So far regulators have been caught between a rock and a hard place. Act too soon, and ill-formed policies stifle innovation. Act too late, and you fail to protect society and industry. The choice for citizens globally is split: look to the state to regulate AI or to business?

No country has a coherent approach to regulating AI, and regulations quickly morph into principles and investment strategies. Take the 2019 OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence, the first universal standards agreed to by major nations to promote AI technologies that respect human rights and democracy. In July, the European Commission published its AI High-Level Expert Group Assessment List to provide a checklist for businesses to self-assess the trustworthiness of their AI systems. While such voluntary non-binding guidelines encourage the responsible development of AI, they hold no regulatory clout.

Setting standards is an important first step, what is next is to translate these principles into national and international law. Much of the talk about regulating AI is also positioned alongside driving inward investment. Singapore’s AI Governance framework lists out AI policy principles alongside investment targets. This is a sign of how global competition for AI, and the promise of economic reward, has pushed AI regulation to the sidelines. Rather, effective regulation will do more to support AI reaching its full economic potential than suppress it.

If you look at the top three tech hubs – the United States, China and the United Kingdom – each one is taking a very different approach. The US free market model has championed corporates focused on self-regulation. China’s authoritarian approach, outlined in the 2017 initiative New Generation AI Development Plan, promotes a national push to become the world’s “leading AI power by 2030” and sets itself in competition with the rest of the world. The UK is taking the middle ground, working with the public and private sector.

When it comes to the responsible and ethical development of AI, the UK leads the pack. The UK is uniquely placed to capitalise on this and develop policies and laws with a pragmatic understanding of how the technology works, and what the implications are. The 2018 AI Sector deal and the flurry of new-formed bodies since – the Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation, Regulatory Horizons Council and the UK government’s AI Council – show immense promise to bridge the gap between industry and government, and advocate for AI regulation that serves to support, not stifle innovation.

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

Elliot Wellsteed-Crook is head of partnerships and public relations at London Tech Week.

Topics in this article :