Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Spotlight
7 April 2018updated 04 Aug 2021 10:51am

Eileen Burbidge Q&A: “London is the financial services capital of the world“

The Treasury's Special Envoy for Fintech talks about the unique financial landscape offered by the UK capital.    

By Oscar Williams

At the Treasury’s International Fintech Conference last month, Eileen Burbidge told Spotlight what makes London such an attractive launch pad for fintech companies.

You often describe London as the fintech capital of the world. Why does it deserve that title?

First of all, there is its financial services heritage. There’s no question: London and New York alternate in terms of being the financial services capital of the world. The time zone in London means you can conduct a financial services transaction and settle within the same business day as in Asia and America. On top of that, we have this growing digital ecosystem, and we have progressive regulators that are very thoughtful, in contrast to the US and other markets.

It’s like Wall Street, plus Silicon Valley, plus Washington DC operating in one city. There’s no other city that comes close.

How will Brexit affect the sector?

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

The most immediate impact of Brexit is that it’s a distraction. Entrepreneurs just want to focus on building their businesses. Being concerned about Brexit is an opportunity cost. There is also potential risk attached to attracting talent. Obviously we’re doing a lot to develop domestic talent but, like every other market in the world, we need to rely on international talent as well. I fear that Great Britain looks a little less welcoming now.

That will be a palpable issue because really high growth fintech start-ups need that highly skilled talent. The third point is less material than those first two and that is the risk to regulated entities should we not have full passporting rights after the transition period.

Content from our partners
A global hub for content producers, gaming and entertainment companies in Abu Dhabi
Insurance: finding sustainable growth in stormy markets
Why public health policy needs to refocus

The Treasury is going to work as hard as possible for some sort of equivalence, but there’s also this worst case scenario in which we don’t have full passporting rights and that will be a distraction. But for fintech it’s probably less of an issue than the existing financial services institutions because less than half of them need to be regulated, but it affects the ecosystem and our foundational layer.

Do fintech start-ups represent a genuine threat to legacy institutions?

I think fintech start-ups add a little competitive pressure. Do they actually threaten their existence? No, I don’t think so. TransferWise, for example, couldn’t exist without the incumbent banks.

The biggest existential threat to the banks is going to look like an Alibaba, like an Amazon or an Apple. It’s not the start-ups or small companies.

I think they recognise that now and there’s great opportunity for institutions to work together with small, agile teams to bring innovation into their organisation whether that’s through acquisitions or collaborations. I don’t know if the tech firms will go into banking with a regulated capital B, but they will go into financial services.

Topics in this article: