New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Science & Tech
10 July 2017updated 19 Aug 2021 3:21pm

How a badly faked photo of Vladimir Putin took over Twitter

Plus: how to identify fake images online. 

By Amelia Tait

Last week, the world’s eyes were on Vladimir Putin. As the Russian president sat down for his long-awaited meeting with Donald Trump during the G20 summit, the world held its breath. No one could look away. And nowhere was Putin’s pull better illustrated than in this viral photo of the leader, fixed with the rapt, almost adoring, gazes of Trump, Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and Turkey’s foreign minister Mevlut Cavusoglu. If your average picture speaks a thousand words, this one spoke a million.

Or it would’ve – if it was real.

Over the weekend the picture spread across social media, accumulating hundreds of thousands of retweets and shares. Some users quickly pointed out the photo was faked and that Putin had been Photoshopped into an empty chair. Despite this, the picture continued to spread, with many making memes and jokes about a moment that never even happened.

It is not clear where the picture originated. @Hasavrat is a Turkish Twitter user who gained more than 15,000 retweets and 25,000 likes on her tweet of the picture on 8 July, which was captioned: “A Renaissance painting of our age”. She tells me she found the image on the “Turkish Twittersphere” and she doesn’t know who created it. “It was one of those feeds that does political satire and meme-type commenting – we call it #Goygoy in Turkish,” she explains.

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via saturdayread.substack.com The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via morningcall.substack.com
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

One of the other earliest posts of the Photoshop was shared by the Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev, who shared it on his Facebook page on 8 July and deleted it after it emerged it was fake. This has led to some claiming the picture was created and spread by the Russian media to showcase Putin’s power. In the picture, Angela Merkel has been Photoshopped so that it appears she is wearing a ribbon of Saint George, a Russian military decoration often worn as a symbol of support for the Russian government. Were the picture created by Russian government-sanctioned propagandists, you’d imagine the Photoshop would be infinitely better. 

Although the picture’s creator is currently unknown, it is clear different people spread the photo for different reasons.

“I didn’t think it was real when I tweeted it,” @Hasavrat tells me, “I was very surprised and sort of regretted tweeting it at all.” She says she captioned the image with the words “of our age” because she was referring to the use of Photoshop, memes, and gifs in modern political discourse. Her intended audience were her Turkish Twitter followers, who she assumed would understand the joke.

“I did consider deleting it,” she says, “because I was noticing people were responding with ‘[it’s a] Photoshop’ non-stop, which is when it became apparent people thought it was real. I didn’t because I found it amusing, especially when journalists, MPs, think-tankers, etc started picking it up. People who I think really ought to know how to use Google Image search.

“Everyone has an inner troll, or at least I certainly do. I just muted the notifications on it.”

The fake picture continued to spread under joke captions, meaning many didn’t scrutinise its authenticity. Twitter user @ParkerMolloy shared the picture with the lyrics from the 1978 musical Grease, riffing off a scene in which the Pink Ladies surrounded the main character, Sandy. Molloy gained tens of thousands of retweets on the image, but deleted it on 10 July. “People seem to think I was trying to pass it off as real, so I deleted it,” she wrote.

On 9 July, Twitter users began sharing the news the photo was fake. Evan McMurry, a media editor at ABC, gained 13,500 retweets on his tweet showcasing the Photoshop and the original image. Earlier in the day, BuzzFeed editor Matthew Champion gained nearly 600 retweets when he shared the news. It has long been apparent that debunking posts don’t go anywhere near as viral as the fake posts themselves, and this incident seems no exception. Though McMurry’s tweet gained more shares than traditional debunks, there are still many online unaware that the picture is faked.

In 2012, academics found that 86 percent of fake images about Hurricane Sandy were spread through retweets, not original tweets. You don’t have to save and re-upload a fake image to be complicit in the damage they cause. To help you avoid this, the New Statesman has created a comprehensive guide to identifying fake images.

Content from our partners
An innovative approach to regional equity
ADHD in the criminal justice system: a case for change – with Takeda
The power of place in tackling climate change

Topics in this article :