Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. Welfare
18 January 2021updated 25 Jul 2021 11:48am

It would be morally indefensible – and politically foolish – to cut Universal Credit

The reversal of the £20-a-week increase in Universal Credit would cost six million families £1,040 a year.

By Anoosh Chakelian

The government’s decision to raise Universal Credit by £20 a week at the start of the pandemic was both welcome and practical. It provided officials with a ready-made benefit system that only needed to be tweaked to reach those most affected by Covid-19’s economic impact.

Ever since then, however, a question has become ever more urgent: will the money – planned for 12 months only – be taken away at the next Budget on 3 March? To date, the government has not suggested otherwise. Having argued that current borrowing is unsustainable, the Chancellor, Rishi Sunak, reportedly intends to reverse the increase and provide only a one-off £500 payment. 

[Hear more from Anoosh on The New Statesman Podcast]

The extra funding is worth £1,040 a year to six million families, who will face the sharpest drop in living standards in a generation if the cut goes ahead, the Resolution Foundation has warned. Poverty and inequality charities and think tanks, the Labour Party and campaigners including the footballer Marcus Rashford have been urging the government to retain the increase in Universal Credit. 

Labour will use an opposition day debate today to highlight the issue – in an attempt to flush out Tory MPs who are in favour of the increase in a (non-binding) vote. Although Tory MPs have been told to abstain by Boris Johnson, the issue is a headache for the Conservative Party beyond this afternoon’s debate.

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

The Northern Research Group of 65 Tory MPs, for example, has called the uplift “a real life-saver for people throughout this pandemic” and warned that ending it would be “devastating” for families “already struggling to stay afloat”. There are also reports that the Work and Pensions Secretary, Thérèse Coffey, and other cabinet ministers oppose Sunak and are pushing to extend the payment.

Content from our partners
Insurance: finding sustainable growth in stormy markets
Why public health policy needs to refocus
The five key tech areas for the public sector in 2023

As millions more people applied for benefits last year, Universal Credit has become a priority issue for many more MPs, Conservative and otherwise. Not only has the increase in the benefit been vital to millions of claimants, but many constituents are relying on social security for the first time ever.

As the New Statesman has reported, these newcomers to the system are more likely to have had higher incomes and owned homes than the existing claimant base – and are therefore more politically influential among Conservative MPs. During the rebellion of Tory MPs against the tier system last December, for example, the South Dorset MP Richard Drax said he “cannot vote to see more of my hard-pressed constituents moved from independence to Universal Credit”.

The divisions among Tory MPs and cabinet ministers show how Universal Credit’s generosity is becoming an increasingly politically salient issue. Meanwhile, the Conservative Party press office has weaponised against the Labour Party Keir Starmer’s plan to “scrap” Universal Credit in favour of another system – describing the payment as “vital support for millions of people”. This trend will be the driving force behind any U-turn at the Budget.