New Times,
New Thinking.

PMQs review: Rishi Sunak’s year keeps getting worse

The Prime Minister’s crude trans joke and his £1,000 Rwanda bet have exposed his lack of judgement.

By Freddie Hayward

The Prime Minister’s week is getting worse. His decision to place a £1,000 bet with Piers Morgan that flights carrying asylum seekers to Rwanda will take off before the election has exposed him on two fronts. It makes him seem pitiless for gambling on the lives of those in peril. It also makes him look like a man for whom £1,000 is small change. He probably thought refusing to take the bet would make him look uptight and unsure about his policy. But he didn’t think through the alternative. 

It was no surprise then that Keir Starmer began today’s PMQs with an inevitable jibe over the Prime Minister’s new gambling habit. “A year ago, the Prime Minister promised to bring NHS waiting lists down – isn’t he glad he didn’t bet a grand on it?” the Labour leader poked. At least I stand by my commitments, Rishi Sunak replied. “He’s so indecisive the only bet he’d make is an each-way bet.”

The jovial point-scoring did not last long. Then, Sunak made another tactless decision. To prove that Starmer lacked conviction, the PM began listing the promises that the Labour leader had broken: pensions, planning, peerages, “defining a woman! Although in fairness that was only 99 per cent of a U-turn,” Sunak said. The atmosphere plummeted. Esther Ghey – mother of the murdered transgender teenager Brianna Ghey – was due to be watching from the public gallery above their heads. Starmer, who was visibly angry, paused before standing to the despatch box and said: “Of all the weeks to say that, when Brianna’s mother is in this chamber – shame.”

Although asked to apologise by the Labour MP Liz Twist, Sunak’s only response to the outrage within the chamber was to repeat that the murder was a dreadful event. The Prime Minister’s spokesperson refused to apologise afterwards. If No 10 does end up saying sorry, it will have to explain why the joke is only unacceptable when a person such as Ghey is in the chamber and fine the rest of the time. 

Expect this issue to consume the political narrative for some time yet. Back in the chamber, Starmer ploughed on. After some unproductive back-and-forth about tax rises and the reasons dentistry is so poor in this country, he arrived at an illuminating point about the Prime Minister’s difficulty with reading the room. The Labour leader said: “Last week [the Prime Minister] and his MPs were laughing at someone whose mortgage had gone up £1,000 a month. This week he’s casually made a £1,000 bet in the middle of an interview. Last week he thought even raising questions about the cost of living was, and I quote, resorting to the ‘politics of envy’… [does he] understand why his own MPs are saying he simply does not get what Britain needs?” This is the type of question that could resonate with voters during the election campaign if the Prime Minister continues to misjudge the balance between political jousting and exhibiting normal levels of sympathy. 

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

Nonetheless, this was not the most revealing moment of the show (and it is a show). That came before the exchange between Starmer and Sunak, when Fleur Anderson, the Labour MP for Putney, asked the PM whether he agreed with his Foreign Secretary, David Cameron, that the UK could recognise a Palestinian state as part of “irreversible” progress towards a two-state solution. Sunak did not leap to the defence of his Foreign Secretary. He did not even mention him by name. He simply said: “Our long-standing position has been that we will recognise a Palestinian state at a time that is most conducive to the peace process.” It was not a defence of Cameron that will resoundingly put to bed the rumours of a gap between the two politicians. 

The Foreign Secretary has supposedly been given permission to take the lead on foreign policy. With that power he has made the government more critical of Israel and more receptive of Palestinian demands. But he seems to have gone too far for No 10’s liking. This looks like an attempt to rein him in. But will this work?

[See also: Who runs Labour?]

Content from our partners
Peatlands are nature's unsung climate warriors
How the apprenticeship levy helps small businesses to transform their workforce
How to reform the apprenticeship levy

Topics in this article : , , ,