Support 100 years of independent journalism.

Will the coronavirus pandemic change public attitudes to migration?

Polling suggests half of voters want to see lower levels of immigration after the pandemic – but some in Labour expect that opposition to soften.

By Patrick Maguire

One of the big questions facing both the Conservatives and Labour is how immigration policy might change once the free movement of people from the EU ceases when the transition period ends later this year.

Officially, the government’s preference is for a points-based system that judges EU and non-EU migrants, yet precise details are scarce. What is clear, however, is that such a regime might actually increase net migration.

Labour, meanwhile, has yet to commit or even sketch out the broad contours of its own policy. Last year the party conference passed policy demanding the retention and extension of free movement, but its manifesto made clear that it would end, as did their manisfesto in 2017.

Keir Starmer suggested free movement to and from the EU ought to stay during his leadership campaign, but Nick Thomas-Symonds, his home secretary, would not be drawn one way or the other in an interview with Sky on Sunday.

But what do the public want – and might attitudes be shifting because of the coronavirus pandemic? New polling by Redfield and Wilton Strategies for the New Statesman reveals that 50 per cent of voters want to see the government adopt a policy that results in fewer people coming to the United Kingdom once the outbreak is over.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

Almost one in four – 39 per cent – wish to see a policy that results in about the same number of people settling in the UK, while 12 per cent want a more liberal regime that drives up inward migration.

Content from our partners
How do we secure the hybrid office?
How materials innovation can help achieve net zero and level-up the UK
Fantastic mental well-being strategies and where to find them

Preferences are heavily split along partisan lines, with 73 per cent of voters who backed the Conservatives in 2019 favouring lower immigration. Just 26 per cent of Labour voters took the same position, with 55 per cent instead favouring no change in levels of immigration. Nineteen per cent want to see more inward migration.

The number of Tory voters who say they are receptive to anything but a more draconian approach is far lower. Twenty-two per cent want to keep immigration at about the same level, while only 8 per cent back higher levels of immigration.

Figures such as those might well influence the thinking of a Labour leadership that is keeping a close eye on public opinion, and calibrating its policy responses accordingly.

Some on the frontbench, however, believe the months to come could see the popular mood shift to a more pro-migration consensus if further pressure on the NHS highlights its reliance on migrant healthcare workers, and if a drop in seasonal migration into the agricultural sector leaves – in the words of one shadow minister – “food rotting in the fields”.