Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. UK Politics
23 January 2019

9 low points of International Trade Secretary Liam Fox’s car crash interview

The disgraced former defence secretary speaks. Nonsense.

By Media Mole

Liam Fox, who had to resign from cabinet in 2011 for breaking the ministerial code by styling his mate Adam Werritty as an adviser and bringing him into official meetings, has proved yet again why he’s rubbish at government.

As International Trade Secretary (look, in Theresa May’s defence, there weren’t any suitable senior Brexiteers to choose from for her cabinet), Fox is notorious for spouting nonsense about Brexit.

Remember when he said a free trade agreement with the EU should be “one of the easiest in human history” to negotiate? Or when he promised he’d have “up to 40” trade deals “ready for one second after midnight” when the UK leaves the EU this March?

Well, he continued in this dishonourable tradition in an interview on Radio 4’s Today programme this morning:

1 “We’re not telling them [business leaders in Davos] to prepare ‘for’, we’re telling to prepare ‘in case of’ a no deal Brexit”

So, to “prepare for”, then.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

2 “We can find ways of dealing with those issues [of a hard border between Ireland and Northern Ireland]. I think there are ways in terms of the technology we have, cooperation we could have, mutual recognition – a whole range of ways in which we can deal with that.”

That’s it, the Irish border question and the biggest obstacle to Theresa May passing her deal, SOLVED in one sentence by Dr L Fox. And there’s not just one solution, there’s a “whole range”! Why didn’t you tell us earlier, you beautiful genius?

Content from our partners
How do we secure the hybrid office?
How materials innovation can help achieve net zero and level-up the UK
Fantastic mental well-being strategies and where to find them

3 “Some of the amendments being spoken about where the House of Commons would take control over the initiation of legislation – there’s a real danger here, and it’s a much bigger constitutional one… The danger is you change our constitutional conventions.”

Yep. Liam Fox, ladies and gentleman, warning someone else’s actions could result in unintended consequences and a constitutional crisis. Accusing someone else of disrespecting the norms of UK politics. Accusing someone else of being a danger to the parliamentary system. Liam Fox.

4 “I think the worst outcome in this political process would be for Parliament, having given a guarantee to voters, that they would honour the result of the referendum to turn round and break that contract with the voters.”

The worst outcome. The worst outcome?

5 “Think about the political consequences as well as the short-term economic consequences.”

Guys, lighten up about those pesky economic consequences! Who needs money? Or insulin? Or clean drinking water…

6 “I think the most calamitous outcome would be for Parliament having promised to respect the result of the referendum to turn around and say they wouldn’t.”

And again.

7 “What you’re actually asking is: is having no Brexit a sustainable picture at all?”

No, he’s not. Delaying Article 50 wouldn’t stop Brexit.

8 “I think the most dangerous thing for Britain politically is for Brexit to be denied to the British people when they were explicitly promised it by the Parliament.”

And again, folks.

9 “It would open up a gulf of trust between Parliament and the people.”

Imagine a politician acting in a way that degrades public trust? Just imagine!