Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. UK Politics
22 October 2018updated 09 Jul 2021 7:16am

What’s behind the Labour Party’s rift with Hindu voters?

By Stephen Bush

The Chief Rabbi’s intervention has triggered a series of statements by other religious leaders. The Archbishop of Canterbury has released a supportive statement, as has the Muslim Council of Britain, who have also accused the Conservative Party of approaching Islamophobia within their party with “denial, dismissal and deceit”. The Hindu Council of Britain have released a statement in support of the Chief Rabbi, and have gone further, accusing Labour of having become an anti-Hindu force. 

What’s the cause of the breach between Labour and the Hindu Council? The party’s vocal opposition to India’s decision to strip Kashmir of its special status. But that Labour is in the firing line speaks to one of the most remarkable and shameless developments of recent times: the Conservatives’ local success in running against and demonising a position that they share at a national level with the Labour leadership. A majority of British Hindus voted Conservative in both 2015 and 2017 and are likely to do the same in December.  

Labour was sharply criticised for its condemnation of India’s actions in Kashmir in September by both the ruling BJP and the Congress Party, and both major parties think that it will cost Labour among British Hindus in December – but Labour’s conference motion is, word for word, identical to the official position of the government.

But a constituency level, Conservative candidates have, seemingly with great success, managed to insulate themselves from that position. British Hindus are being urged on WhatsApp to vote against Labour due to its anti-Hindu position, and those messages have a strong strain of anti-Muslim sentiment in them. 

That’s the real problem with the debate about whether or not Boris Johnson is racist, or Jeremy Corbyn is racist. Amber Rudd was one of the most liberal-minded politicians to occupy the Home Office in recent decades, during which she oversaw the Windrush Scandal – that she felt unhappy about it is neither here nor there. As I wrote yesterday, what is in Jeremy Corbyn’s heart is a side issue – what matters is what Corbyn has done, or not done, as leader of the Labour Party. 

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

And whether or not the Conservative Party’s leadership is itself hostile towards Muslims is a side issue – what matters is that the modern Conservative Party runs sectarian campaigns in parts of the United Kingdom as a matter of course, saying one thing and doing another, and stirring up cross-community tension into the bargain. 

Content from our partners
How automation can help telecoms companies unlock their growth potential
The pandemic has had a scarring effect on loneliness, but we can do better
Feel confident gifting tech to your children this Christmas