Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. The Staggers
19 June 2020updated 23 Jul 2021 9:46am

The contact tracing app is a failure, but not the only one

There are several flaws in the government's test and trace programme, and they all add up to one big problem. 

By Ailbhe Rea

Another day, another U-turn. The government has abandoned the “world-beating” centralised contact-tracing app it spent three months and millions of pounds on developing, to integrate it with the toolkit for a decentralised tracing app, developed by Google and Apple. It will not be ready until the autumn, or even the winter.

To summarise: the NHS app is good at distance, bad for privacy, to the extent that its Bluetooth-reliant software can’t run effectively on Apple devices, due to those devices’ privacy protections. The Apple/Google app toolkit, meanwhile, affords greater data privacy, but at the expense of accurate distance measurement.

There is some sympathy with Matt Hancock’s push for a state-developed app that overcomes these accuracy issues and some frustration at a perceived lack of cooperation from Apple. But only some sympathy, because need for the U-turn was entirely foreseeable months ago and those intervening months have cost the government money, time, and political credibility.  

But while the outcry continues over yet another U-turn, it is worth stepping back to observe the bigger picture, which suggests the main problem with the test and trace programme is not the tracing, but the testing.

“Independent SAGE”, the group of experts who have assembled to “shadow” the recommendations made by the government’s scientific advisers, have released a report highlighting concerns over “extensive data gaps” in the tracing system as a result of “haphazard” testing, which, it concludes, makes the current system “unfit for purpose”. It suggests there are missing cases in the community, and that a failure to collect data at every point of the scheme prevents a robust evaluation of its performance, among other detailed criticisms. 

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. A weekly round-up of The New Statesman's climate, environment and sustainability content. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

Some of the report’s recommendations have already been implemented since its release two days ago: Dido Harding announced yesterday that test results are now being lined up with GP records, in a welcome step to address the widespread concern that the tracing scheme is insufficiently integrated with local healthcare providers. But there are myriad further concerns, and it is worth noting Dido Harding’s own acknowledgement that the scheme will not be fully functioning until September.

It’s easy to get excited about another, very obvious, government U-turn over an app developed by the very politician who once named an app after himself. But the real problems with the test and trace system are myriad, small failures in data collection, insufficient local healthcare involvement, under-performance by private contractors, among other things.

These are not as sexy, as simple, nor as accessible to the lay reader as a single, obvious app disaster. Nevertheless, these are the things that desperately need to be scrutinised and put right. 

Content from our partners
Cyber security is a team game
Why consistency matters
Community safety includes cyber security