New Times,
New Thinking.

Can Labour keep up its Brexit balancing act?

The party’s ambiguity faces one big hurdle. 

By Stephen Bush

Labour are a party of Remainers outside of Westminster led by Brexiteers inside it. The reasons for that are complex: among the Labour leadership there are those who distrust the European Court of Justice and want to escape its regulatory orbit, as well as longstanding Eurosceptics. On the backbenches there are leavers from the Labour left, MPs who feel that the referendum mandate can only be met by ending the free movement of people, and MPs who fear losing the third of Labour voters who backed an Out vote in 2016. All of those beliefs pull the party towards a fairly drastic exit from the European Union.

But the majority of people who voted Labour in 2017 backed Remain in 2016 and for a significant chunk of them, they did so believing the party broadly shared their view.

That’s one of the few sources of Conservative optimism: sooner or later, or so the thesis runs, there will have to be reckoning between Labour’s position and that of its voters.

I am dubious about this for a variety of reasons, not least first-past-the-post, which makes it hard for Remainers to punish Labour without rewarding the Conservatives.

But this was a week in which we began to see how that thesis might come true: firstly after Jeremy Corbyn told this week’s meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party that single market membership was incompatible with Brexit, and secondly after a Brighton Labour councillor caused a small storm on Twitter when he branded whining Remainers “neoliberal snowflakes”.

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

Corbyn’s remarks were overshadowed first by Theresa May’s bad reshuffle and then by Tim Farron’s latest thoughts on gay sex, and no-one really cares what happens on Twitter at the best of times. Day-to-day, Labour’s ambiguity over Brexit is sustained by clever tactical work on the Labour side and May’s unwillingness to work with other parties. (It’s striking that the best thing for the country and the Conservative Party would have been a big, generous offer to work on Brexit with the other parties – that would force Labour to commit to a position, quite probably one not a million miles away from the Conservative one. Fortunately for Labour, she’s not that kind of politician.)

That means that the only big bear trap for Labour is the vote on the deal itself, when Labour will have to commit to one or the other. But I don’t think they will get caught on that one, as the easy way out is just to vote it down because it does not secure “the best possible access” to the single market, a form of words around which all of Labour can unite even as they disagree on the meaning.  

Content from our partners
We need an urgent review of UK pensions
The future of private credit
Peatlands are nature's unsung climate warriors