After just 48 years, we can announce the very late arrival of the third runway at Heathrow. Assuming, that is, that it makes its way past the legal challenge from five local councils and Greenpeace, the consultation with local residents, and the financial worries of the big airlines. And that’s not counting the political struggles…
While the Times leads with the logistical headaches – “Heathrow runway may be built over motorway” is their splash, the political hurdles dominate most of this morning’s papers
“Tory rebels let fly on Heathrow” says the i‘s frontpage, while the FT goes for “Prominent Tories lead challenge to May on Heathrow expansion”. Although Justine Greening, a May loyalist to her fingertips, has limited herself to a critical blogpost, Boris Johnson has said the project is “undeliverable” and will lead to London becoming “a city of planes”.
But May’s real headache is Zac Goldsmith, who has quit, triggering a by-election in his seat of Richmond Park, in which he will stand as an anti-Heathrow candidate. “Heathrow forces May into Brexit by-election” is the Telegraph‘s splash.
CCHQ has decided to duck out of the contest entirely, leaving Goldsmith running as the Conservative candidate in all but name, against the Liberal Democrat Sarah Olney.
What are Goldsmith’s chances? To win the seat, the Liberal Democrats would need a 19.3 per cent swing from the Conservatives – and in Witney, they got exactly that.
They will also find it easier to squeeze the third-placed Labour vote than they did in Witney, where they started the race in fourth place. They will find that task all the easier if the calls for Labour to stand aside are heeded by the party leadership. In any case, that Clive Lewis, Lisa Nandy and Jonathan Reynolds have all declared that they should will be a boost for Olney even if she does face a Labour candidate.
The Liberal Democrats are fond of leaflets warning that their rivals “cannot win here” and thanks to Witney they have one ready made.
Goldsmith risks having the worst of all worlds. I’m waiting to hear whether or not the Conservatives will make their resources freely available to Goldsmith, but it is hard to see how, without taking an axe to data protection laws, he can make use of Conservative VoterID or information gathered in his doomed mayoral campaign.
But in any case, the Liberal Democrats will still be able to paint him as the Brexit candidate and the preferred choice of the pro-Heathrow Prime Minister, as he is. I think Goldsmith will find he has bitten more than he can chew this time.