Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. Brexit
25 January 2017updated 26 Jan 2017 9:41pm

Downing Street’s attempt to find common ground with Donald Trump will end in disaster

Even on the issues the two administrations think they agree on, there is a huge gulf. 

By Stephen Bush

While the focus in Westminster is still on the fallout from yesterday’s court ruling and the parliamentary battle over Article 50, the foreign-policy focus in Whitehall is on Friday’s visit to meet Donald Trump.

In the FT, George Parker has a good primer on what Downing Street wants out of the trip, while his colleague Demetri Sevastopulo has the view from the White House. Progress on a US-UK trade deal has become psychologically important on both sides. For the Trump administration, because it proves the hype over his ability as a dealmaker, and for Downing Street, as a proof-of-concept that the UK can survive and thrive as a beacon of free trade after Brexit.

The two sides will focus on the things they agree on: trade deals (good) and Islamic terrorism (bad). But the problem is that even on those areas of unity, the phrase “dialogue of the deaf” comes to mind.

Let’s take trade. May’s inner circle have been worried since before Trump’s election that the Brexit vote, the global opposition to TTIP the success of Bernie Sanders and Trump’s candidacy, let alone his victory, were all part of an alarming worldwide reaction against free trade. Trump’s inner circle believe that every trade deal the United States has signed has been to the detriment of the other United States and to the advantage of other nations. As far as the global fight for free trade is concerned, Trump is part of the problem, not the solution. 

Any US-UK trade deal is quickly going to get bogged down in the Trump administration’s hostility to fair trade deals and the thorny issues of British agriculture and the public services.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

And then there’s Islamic terrorism. Trump believes that Vladimir Putin is part of the solution as far as Syria is concerned and seems to be willing to grant him freedom of manoeuvre not only as far as his own citizens are concerned but his immediate neighbourhood as well. The British government is among the most hostile to Putin in the world, something which will become even more striking once Francois Hollande enters retirement.

Content from our partners
How do we secure the hybrid office?
How materials innovation can help achieve net zero and level-up the UK
Fantastic mental well-being strategies and where to find them

And those are just the areas we think we can at least make warm noises on as far as Trump is concerned. We shouldn’t forget that May is not the first, but the second global leader to meet with Donald Trump since his shock election. The first was Shinzo Abe. Among his priorities: maintaining the security of America’s allies in the Pacific and preserving TPP. Since that visit, Trump has continued to pioneer his destabilising new model of TweetDeck diplomacy as far as North Korea and China are concerned, and has mothballed TTP. The Prime Minister shouldn’t expect her trip to work out any better.