New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Election 2024
24 June 2015

Trident’s an outdated waste. Even the military say so

A new report shows how antiquated our nuclear deterrent is.

By Kate Hudson

The way David Cameron uses his backing for Trident replacement to appear “tough on defence”, one would be forgiven for thinking that the military is four-square behind the Conservatives.

But a new report shows that this couldn’t be further from the truth.

In fact – across the armed forces – there are grave concerns that Britain’s nuclear weapons system neither addresses the real security threats facing Britain, nor represents value for money.

In a serious political intervention, Major General Patrick Cordingley, who led British forces in the first Gulf War, said:

‘Strategic nuclear weapons have no military use. It would seem the government wishes to replace Trident simply to remain a nuclear power alongside the other four permanent members of the UN Security Council. This is misguided and flies in the face of public opinion; we have more to offer than nuclear bombs.’

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

The report – British military attitudes to nuclear weapons and disarmament – by the Nuclear Information Service and the Nuclear Education Trust – is a ground-breaking study into military thinking on nuclear weapons. And it is startling to find that the military establishment is far from unanimous on the issue of Trident replacement.

Some participants in the study, commenting on the exorbitant cost of Trident replacement, stated that “no circumstances justify the large amounts of money required by [Trident] and this money would be better spent elsewhere.”

Many participants in the survey were also unclear about many aspects of the UK’s nuclear weapons, including their costs, purpose and credibility.

With a final decision on Trident replacement due in 2016 – at a price tag of £100 billion – now is the time for a hard-headed look at the strategic utility of nuclear weapons.

We already knew that the Government’s own National Security Strategy in 2010 downgraded the threat of state-on-state nuclear attack.

We already knew that former Defence Secretaries across the political spectrum from Michael Portillo to Des Browne have concluded that Trident is a waste of money.

Now we know that many in the military think Trident is a “political” tool and little more – that many in the armed forces would rather see the money spent on equipment which could actually be used: especially at a time when the military has been faced with spending cuts.

Many across the UK think Trident should be scrapped. Whether that is for moral, legal, economic or strategic reasons – the Government cannot afford to ignore public opinion from all quarters.

The time has come to scrap the UK’s nuclear weapons once and for all – and to ignore the opinion of both those who have served in the military and the British public would be an enormous folly.

Kate Hudson is the head of CND. British military attitudes to nuclear weapons and disarmament is released later today.

Content from our partners
We need an urgent review of UK pensions
The future of private credit
Peatlands are nature's unsung climate warriors