Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Culture
  2. Food & Drink
4 January 2016updated 27 Jul 2021 5:25am

Does Dry January do more harm than good?

It's doubtful that a month of abstinence improves our relationship with alcohol. 

By Ian Hamilton

Alcohol Concern has thrown down the gauntlet to drinkers: can you manage a month without alcohol? The campaign, Dry January, aims to attract funding through donations, raise awareness of alcohol-related problems and educate people about the health benefits of abstaining from alcohol.

Aside from saving money, Alcohol Concern claims that abstaining will help you lose weight and improve your sleep, and there is no shortage of participants – more than two million people signed up last year. But is there any evidence that Dry January works?

Gram for gram, alcohol contains almost the same amount of calories as pure fat, so abstaining for a month could reduce your weight, assuming you don’t compensate for the lost calories by eating more. Fat accumulates in the liver as a result of drinking. As little as two weeks abstinence can return your liver to good health, reducing the risk of alcohol-related liver disease. As for improving sleep, there is clear evidence that you will get a better night’s sleep if you abstain from alcohol.

So far, so good. However, Alcohol Concern’s main abition is to change the drinking culture in the UK through events like Dry January. Unfortunately, there is no evidence that Dry January achieves lasting change in consumption or in our beliefs and behaviour in relation to alcohol.

What difference does it make?

The campaign is premised on the idea of social contagion: if your friends start reducing their alcohol intake, the thinking goes, you are more likely to adopt the same behaviour.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

However, there has been an increasing trend in overall consumption of alcohol in the last sixty years with no real signs of abating. Estimates provided by the alcohol industry suggest we are consuming 1.4 litres more of alcohol per person than we were in 1975. (Interestingly, most people exhibit denial when asked how much they drink. This is demonstrated by the consistent difference between self-reported consumption of alcohol and total alcohol sales recorded by HM revenue and customs.)

Content from our partners
Transport is the core of levelling up
The forgotten crisis: How businesses can boost biodiversity
Small businesses can be the backbone of our national recovery

As the long term trend in consumption has risen, so has the number of people developing alcohol-related health problems. Since 2009 there has been a 44 per cent increase in those aged 50 and over accessing alcohol treatment. More generally, alcohol costs every tax payer £120 a year through the one million annual hospital admissions attributable to its use.

More harm than good?

Where does this leave Dry January? For people who have developed a dependency on alcohol, abstaining can produce a rebound effect. As a person experiences withdrawal symptoms such as anxiety, sleep disruption and restlessness – paradoxically the very things that many people find alcohol helps them overcome in the short term. This rebound effect could lead to more serious implications for heavy drinkers such as seizures and hallucinations. For this groupm Dry January may not be the right option. 

Instead, abstinence spread over the year could be more sustainable and better for your body. The consistent advice from the UK government is to have two dry days a week.

Guidance about alcohol has been difficult to communicate and there is generally confusion about safe levels of consumption. Dry January might add to such confusion giving the message that a month of abstinence does away with the need for regular breaks from drinking.

The Conversation

Ian Hamilton is a Lecturer in Mental Health at the University of York

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.