Registered user login:

Libertarian Labour?

Hazel Blears

Published 11 November 2008

Hazel Blears responds to 'point scoring' Lib Dem Lynne Featherstone who criticised what she sees as the Communities Secretary's centralising tendencies

The white paper Communities In Control, and the points I made in my Hansard speech last week, are firmly decentralist, localist, and in favour of passing more power to the people.

I want to see more real power in the hands of local people, stronger local government, more local co-ops, social enterprises and voluntary groups, and a variety of ways for the citizen to engage in the democratic process.

You would think that a Lib Dem might want to engage with some of this debate, because I always thought the Liberals were in favour of the decentralisation of power. But it turns out they would rather score points than support measures which would empower local communities. That’s a shame.

My politics is driven by my passion to see power, influence and control in the hands of local people. My approach is informed by seeing what has worked in Salford. When people have been given the tools, they will do the job. I’ve seen people step up to clean up their neighbourhoods, tackle crime and anti-social behaviour, run Sure Start centres, and regenerate their communities. There’s no shortage of energy, common sense, and determination. John Smith called it ‘the extraordinary potential of ordinary people’, and I see it time and time again as I go round the country, or in my own home city.

Within the British socialist tradition is a strong decentralist strand. Think William Morris, GDH Cole, the municipal ‘gas and water’ socialists, and all those campaigners in women’s groups, gay liberation, and anti-racist groups. Indeed anyone who ever organised a demo, booked a hall, organised a fund-raiser or knocked on doors is part of the progressive tradition which says ‘no answer but your own’.

But the point is that progressive governments need to create the framework for all of this energy and enthusiasm to be channelled in ways that makes a practical difference.

Politics isn’t just about protest, it’s about change. Unless we as government can co-opt all of the people who want to stand up for their communities, do something for the environment, take on drugs gangs, or raise money for their local school, then we will never made lasting change.

We can’t do it all from Whitehall. It needs champions in every community, taking on the vested interests, creating a new common sense of the age. Progressive politics is about winning electoral power, in order to give it away to people.

It is a pity that the Liberals, who after all haven’t been in power for 90 years, and whose entire approach seems to comprise shouting from the sidelines, just don’t get it.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

6 comments from readers

taghioff.info
11 November 2008 at 15:31

The issues lined up here are local democracy and democratising the house of Lords.

Both things are good ideas, but I don't see any concrete proposals explained here.

Surely our politicians can do better than this?

Diversity
11 November 2008 at 17:12

Oh Dear!

Ms Featherstone complains that eleven years of New Labour have not produced the more democratic and more local government which the LibDems have been asking for all that time; and that Ms Blears has now adopted the slogans without any real prospect of getting anything done.

Ms Blears complains that the Liberals have not introduced any policies because they have been out of government; and that referring to New Labour' s record or lack of record is point scoring.

If any points are being scored, Ms Featherstone seems to be well ahead.

But the essential difference seems to be that for Ms Blears it is essential that the government should "co-opt" local people. Ms Featherstone talks about local people doing more of what they want.

I have less objection to being co-opted by Hazel Blears than by Jack Straw or Jaqui Smith; but I really, seriously, do not want to be co-opted by any of them.

will883
11 November 2008 at 17:41

This is the lady who supported her Government closing down local hospitals and other NHS services from Whitehall and then joined a protest march against the closure of a maternity ward in her own constituency.

Roland Baker
11 November 2008 at 18:11

The 4 comments above mine are not from Hazel Blears fans. Sadly I am not a fan either.

Decentralisation of power means putting decisions made centrally back in the hands of local people and devising an accountability for them. Community action on local social problems takes place in the existing system. It is an engagement with politics but it is not decentralisation of "power".

Police Chief Constables are currently appointed. They could be elected in their Police force areas by voters. That would decentralise power, but I am not sure I agree with it even though in some quarters it would be very popular. I prefer not to politicise the Police.

What is a Social Enterprise by the way? How is it a decentralisation? Is it a Limited Partnership, an Unlimited Company, a Sole Trader, a PLC or what? Does it publish accounts according to the Combined Code? Marsh Farm Community Development Trust calls itself a social enterprise. It is a limited company, it refuses all requests to disclose its finances and files at Companies House using all available exemptions so the figures cannot be analysed. So please do not "Social Enterprise" me.

Hazel Blears was supported for Deputy Labour Leader by John Hutton and was eliminated in the first round with under 12% of the poll. Her article here shows why.

thomas
11 November 2008 at 18:32

It is intresting that Hazel Blears says there is ‘no answer but your own’ in one breath, and in the next goes on to dismiss Lynne Featherstone as a member of a group who "just don't get it".

Blears is an incoherent mess and Featherstone is right that the minister for communities is part of the problem.

thomas
11 November 2008 at 18:43

I also wonder if there is any irony in how Blears consultation on the Communities in Control white paper has shown her ability to engage with the public with the stunning response shown on her blog - http://haveyoursay.communities.gov.uk/blogs/hazelblears-empo...

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Hazel Blears

Hazel Blears is MP for Salford, and Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government. She has served as Chair of the Labour Party, as Home Office Minister, and as Public Health Minister.

Read More

Vote!

Should the international community intervene in Gaza?