Registered user login:

Go fourth

Published 18 September 2008

John Prescott, Alastair Campbell, Richard Caborn and Glenys Kinnock call for the party and its supporters to get off the back foot and join a new Campaign for a Labour Fourth Term

EXCLUSIVEIf the polls and pundits are to be believed, within two years or so, David Cameron will be prime minister and the Conservatives back in power.

People should cast their minds back to the mid-Nineties, when the Labour Party under Neil Kinnock held commanding poll leads and won great by-election victories. The same lesson is there for both parties in the subsequent re-election of the Tories in 1992. For the Tories: not to assume that poll leads automatically translate to seats. For Labour: never to give up, never to bow down before fatalism or the self-serving hope of opponents in a self-fulfilling prophesy.

The only real answer to the pollsters' question, "If there were a general election tomorrow, how would you vote?", is: "There isn't one." A lot can happen between now and then.

There is, however, one enormous difference between 1992 and now, and it is this difference to which Labour has to be particularly alert. In that election, and the one which followed in 1997, the big issue was the opposition party, Labour.

Were we fit to govern? Had we changed sufficiently to win back the trust of the people? Had we really thought through the policies, and did the sums add up?

A combination of a highly effective political organisation, and a media that largely followed its strategic lead, ensured that the only party under real intense scrutiny was ours.

Yet now, with the Tories well ahead in the polls, when it comes to real scrutiny, it is as though they didn't really exist.

Labour needs to rediscover the passion that gave us victory in the first place, to defend our record with pride

If most of us were to stop people at random in the street, and ask them to name three things that David Cameron would do as prime minister, it is not an insult to the public to suggest most would struggle to answer.

Likewise, most people would struggle to name more than two or three current members of the shadow cabinet. The people who would run our schools, hospitals, roads, armed forces are virtual unknowns outside the Westminster village.

This is not merely the result of a media bored with the story of Labour in power and keen for a new set of characters to populate the soap opera that passes for media debate on policy. It is also the result of a deliberate Conservative strategy to avoid policy, avoid facing the difficult decisions that politics ultimately requires you to make, and go along with the media game of making Gordon Brown the only story in town, preferably with as negative a slant as can be found.

There is no point in moaning, however. We have to do something about it. Not just the Prime Minister, not just the cabinet or the MPs, this includes anyone who understands that Britain is best served by a fourth-term Labour government, not a return to a Conservative Party scared to bring forward policies of substance because its MPs and members have not changed sufficiently to embrace anything other than the style and froth Mr Cameron is very good at.

That is why we are urging people to sign up to a new campaigning organisation, Go Fourth - Campaign for a Labour Fourth Term - a campaign dedicated to supporting the fight for the re-election of a Labour government and committed to the same principles and values that have won us an unprecedented three consecutive victories.

We passionately believe this party needs to get off the back foot, out of its despondency, and start campaigning on our proud record of government so we can take the fight to the Tories.

It's not going to be easy - we need to work harder than we've ever worked, campaign better than we've ever campaigned and reach out wider than we ever have.

To this end, the campaign's main aims will be to:

Proudly defend the record of the Labour government since 1997;

Actively support the government in promoting policies that will build on our successes;

Encourage greater participation in the Labour Party;

Highlight the damage a Conservative government will do to Britain.

Anyone who supports these four aims, and who believes Britain's best interests will be maintained by a Labour not a Tory government, is welcome to join our Campaign for a Labour Fourth Term. We are looking beyond politicians, or those who are normally active in the political debate, to a wider support. When we launch in six weeks' time, we'll spell out just how we can all come together to take on the Conservatives.

There were those who believed, when Labour lost the 1992 election - having been so far ahead in the polls, only to see that lead erode - that we would never get power again. Five years later, we were elected in a landslide.

Our opponents then pointed out that Labour had never secured two full successive terms in power.

When we won another landslide, some felt it would not be possible to win a third term. Yet, even after all the difficulties raised in the debate over Iraq, Labour did win a third term.

A fourth term, once unthinkable, remains a real prospect. More than that, it is vital to the future of Britain.

The Tory party has had to accept many of the changes Labour has made for the country. But while Britain has changed for the better, we should never forget that the Tories opposed the changes needed to make those improvements. And any analysis of their policy prospectus shows an unchanged party that has little understanding of the role of government in helping people face the challenges of modern life.

"Time for a change" is their only cry. But change to what? That is a question that the Campaign for a Labour Fourth Term will help the country answer.

The change would be to an outmoded, old-fashioned, elitist party determined to take Britain back to the days when the country was run by and for a privileged few, not for the many.

We are proud of what Labour has achieved for Britain. And we are determined to do what we can to stop the country going back to the Conservatives.

Rightly in politics, there is an enormous focus on the party leaders. But the fight cannot be won by them alone. Labour needs to rediscover the passion that gave us victory in the first place, to defend our record with pride, promote our policy agenda with confidence, knowing that we are alone in having thought through policies to meet the great challenges of our time.

Now is the time to get back on the campaign trail. So let's get knocking on the doors, fighting on the web and tackling the Conservatives through the media.

The Tories are still the same old Tories; offering the same quack prescriptions and easy options. We've beaten them three times already, so let's go for a fourth and stop them gaining a victory they have done absolutely nothing to deserve.

So, if you believe in fairness, equality and social justice, it's time to stand up and be counted.

It's time for you to join us in our Campaign for a Labour Fourth Term.

John Prescott is the former deputy prime minister; Alastair Campbell is the former director of communications and strategy for the Prime Minister's Office; Richard Caborn is MP for Sheffield Central; Glenys Kinnock MEP represents Wales in the European Parliament

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

27 comments from readers

MatthewBlott
17 September 2008 at 23:43

Hardly the most inspiring bunch are they.

no-where
18 September 2008 at 03:15

Kinnocks are still feeding heartlly at the trough. Easy

Welsh votes have made them super rich!

discustard
18 September 2008 at 08:59

Go Fourth is not quite right, Come third sounds better.

Kinnocks, Campbell, Bliars, Blunkett should be congratulated on their personal achievments - near millionaires all of them and at my (low rate taxpayer) expense.

swilly
18 September 2008 at 09:02

Go forth !?......... Go forth and multiply more like !!

Jonny Mac
18 September 2008 at 09:18

Bit of a give-away that the people campaigning for a Labour fourth term rather than to get rid of Brown The Disaster are all past it. Those actually in government, of course, are desperate to dump him but don't have the balls to do it.

All so pathetic. We're sick of you. Shut up and clear off.

Jonny Mac
18 September 2008 at 09:48

And incidentally, what a joke Prescott was on Today this morning. Amidst his absurd blustering, "HBOS" provded too difficult to remember, coming out as something like "HB-I-thing". Still, Prescott is famously a simple, unfancy bloke, who likes traditional working class pursuits like punching strangers, shagging his secretary and playing croquet, so he can't be expected to cope with banks that have two whole syllables in their name.

I think when he gets kicked upstairs to the Lords I'm going to kill myself.

mikeg
18 September 2008 at 10:47

So an opposition party that is not discussing policies but just enjoying the discomfort of an unpopular government. A party led by a grinning lightweight who says nothing other than ride the electorate who have decided it's time for change, perhaps accompanied by a suitable pop classic like "Things can only get better". I guess 2008 is remarkably similar to 1997 then, albeit with barefaced hypocrisy from the likes of Alastair Campbell. Hopefully this time a change of government will actually see things get better as opposed to a thousand times worse.

If they're looking for a taglne how about the Fourth Reich ? After all, being a Labour MP criticizing Brown appears to be a crime that costs you your job, which seems ironic given that Brown's leadership is going to cost hundreds of Labour MPs and thousands of voters their jobs

RFK1
18 September 2008 at 11:02

Thanks for this article. This is exactly what the Labour Party needs. Someone needs constantly to expose Cameron and the Tories. The media are giving him a free ride. Good Luck with your campaign.

psmith
18 September 2008 at 11:40

I find it amazing that for a political party that is about fairness, equality and supporting those who cannot support themselves, that the politicians involved have managed to profit quite nicely thank you.

Exactly how many of our so-called wonderful Labour MP's live a life of luxury in their million pound homes. Line your pockets nicely, yet the middle classes to pick up the tab? Now that the economic 'boom' that Labour has supposedly created is ending, where does that leave everyone? Sitting pretty with a comfortable lifestyle, or struggling with mortgage payments, crippling taxes and rampant inflation?

Legacy? Forth term? Come on, hardly a good picture from what I can see. Radical change to put Britain back on the map is what is needed. Not some political party that is desperately raiding the stationary cupboard before they are all fired....

What a sad and predictable end to what could have been something good. In the end, people are all the same, regardless of their supposed politics. Rarely do they follow through with their promises.

215cu
18 September 2008 at 12:24

Let me see..

A Scargillite that reached the dizzy heights of Minister for Culture & Sport.

A serial semantic mangler with a giant chip on his shoulder that can't keep his chips down or his trousers up.

A junket junkie and never held political office anywhere other than the European Union.

And a soft porn author that sexed up more than just Readers Wives.

I want someone to sort out the mess that's is all of Labour's making; not re-elect the same buffoon's to make it worse.

At least you have experience of being in the political wilderness as the article states so I will show no compunction sending you there again.

Scott Redding
18 September 2008 at 13:13

This "back to the days when the country was run by and for a privileged few, not for the many" stuff is malarkey.

Compass found, in 2007, that life expectancy had worsened, compared with 1997, and that infant mortality in the working class had grown. The share of wealth owned by the top 1% rose, and the share owned by the bottom 50% fell. 1 in 7 children lived in bad housing after 10 years of Labour. Two-thirds of ethnic minorities lived in the 88 most deprived wards after 10 years of Labour.

Why in God's green earth do we need a project for a 4th term? A 4th term to do what? Continue these glorious trends towards social justice?

Forward
18 September 2008 at 15:14

I applaud this - it's the right message at the right time, and I believe in it. I hope the strength of the positive message and commitment of those involved spills over into Conference & brings back the confidence in the fourth victory.

npgdavies
18 September 2008 at 21:45

Labour's record over the last 11 years is dire. Fantasy Island economics, incompetent management of anything, a false boom sustained on hidden borrowing, a war based on false information, lies and spin with everything.

Even if the Tories do nothing, it will at least do none of the harm that Labour's hyperactivity has done.

The Tories would have been better off losing in 1992. Their win then proved a Phyrric victory as was seen in 1997 and 2001.

Elections come down to a choice between "better the devils you know" and "time for a change" We know these devils far too well, and we'd be well off with a change this time.

mazza1230
18 September 2008 at 23:05

Now that the thin veneer of electability supplied by Tony Blair has been removed, it seems that Voters have at long last twigged that Labour are a busted flush......Good Riddance!

H Queeny
19 September 2008 at 12:50

At last focusing on Labour's achievements over the last decade! Unsurprisingly those calling for a leadership challenge are those most likely to lose their seats - desperate feeble limelight grabbing backbenchers who are worried about losing their fat salary! Bog off and lets get on with governing the country!

left888
19 September 2008 at 12:59

Well, looks like there's still one deep pit left in Wales. When will the Kinnocks stop digging?

I mean, come on, how does anyone with any brains or self respect go from a good sensible (if pretty restrained) programme with things like nuclear disarmament, to being willing slaves to the most right-wing government we've had yet. If they'd stuck to their principles, they'd be well respected politicians with a good track record. But like so many, they've thrown it all away. Why?

For Richard Caborn, simply alter the names in the above tirade.

And the other two morons don't deserve a mention.

Gerry Harper
19 September 2008 at 15:17

Brilliant , at last lets go for it !! This is just what we need,

go for the enemy and stop the bickering !

J G Miller
21 September 2008 at 00:21

QUOTE

If most of us were to stop people at random in the street, and ask them to name three things that David Cameron would do as prime minister, it is not an insult to the public to suggest most would struggle to answer.

UNQUOTE

And if you were to ask the man in the street the same question about the current Prime Minister Gordon Brown, the man in the street would be even less able to answer.

J G Miller
21 September 2008 at 00:42

QUOTE

Proudly defend the record of the Labour government since 1997

QUOTE

So that would be

1) 6 weeks detention without trial

2) the abolition of the 10 p tax rate

3) the failure to act over Northern Rock until the only option was nationalization

4) no referendum on the EURO despite the promise of one

5) the introduction of tuition fees for university students

6) the sale of the gold reserves at a time of low market price

7) the sale of peerages

8) the millions lost on improperly managed computerization schemes in HMRC and NHS

9) the widening gap between the wealthy and the poor

All of the above one would expect from a Tory government, not a supposedly Labour government.

And the best promise for the next Labout government --

compulsory identity cards, with all the information stored on a

National Identity Management System

that will be made available not just to the security services, but a whole host of government bureaucracies, and probably multinational corporations as well.

acawson
23 September 2008 at 16:19

"Likewise, most people would struggle to name more than two or three current members of the shadow cabinet"

True of the Cabinet itself, as well.

Peter Kenyon
24 September 2008 at 17:01

I will invite them all to join Save the Labour Party http://savethelabourparty.org

john problem
25 September 2008 at 09:59

On balance, one would say that a Punch & Judy show has more intellectual content than this twaddle. That Donald Duck speaks more persuasively, that Mickey Mouse has more nous and that Pinocchio is more truthful. Undeniably more truthful.

treborc
27 September 2008 at 22:21

I see Labour are to end universal benefits, everyone will now go onto JSA which will be time limited two two years carers the sick the disabled the lot.

No more income support.

New Labour, if this is Labour I give up


01 October 2008 at 10:31

I say to members who use this site to remain in the Labour Party for a fouth tern and let the tories go forth and multiply


01 October 2008 at 10:36

I believe that Labour will win the fouth term and the tories can go fouth and mulit..... that includes the rebels who wants a leadership challenge in the Labour Party

AJR
06 October 2008 at 22:36

All of these comments seem to be people bickering about how - in their opinion - Labour isn't worth it any more.

It's sad to see that even readers of the New Statesman have somehow come to the conclusion that David Cameron and his elusive policies could in any way be better for the Britain we've spent the past 11 years working for.

eleanorcross
15 October 2008 at 11:07

OK, so then what exactly are the Conservatives proposing that will make our society fairer and more equitable?

Tax breaks for married couples - discriminating against those who choose not to marry.

Even bigger tax breaks for those couples where one (ie the woman) chooses to stay at home (in her place) with the kids.

Cuts in services that support deprived families, again forcing mothers out of work and into the home to take care of the kids.

Removal of requirements on health services to provide quality care.

I could go on. But whichever way you look at it this does not add up to a viable alternative to Labour. 'Change for change's sake' - is that really what you want for the future of the country?

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Should the international community intervene in Gaza?