War and shopping – the extremism that never speaks its name
The Westfield Stratford centre, backed by a former Israeli commando and touted as the future face of
By John Pilger Published 22 September 2011
Looking for a bookshop that was no longer there, I walked instead into a labyrinth designed as a trap. Leaving became an illusion, rather like Alice once she had stepped through the Looking Glass. Walls of glass curved into concentric circles as one "store" merged into another: Armani Exchange with Dinky-Di Pies. Exits led to gauntlets of more "offers". Seeking a guide, I bought a lousy pair of sunglasses. Anything to get out. It was a vision of hell. It was a Westfield mega mall.
This happened in Sydney - where the Westfield empire began - in a "mall" not half as mega as the one that opened in Stratford, east London on 13 September. "Everything" is here, the architectural critic Jonathan Glancey reported, from Apple to Primark, McDonald's and KFC to Krispy Kreme. There is a cinema with 17 screens and "luxurious VIP seats", and a mega "luxury" bowling alley. Tracey Emin and Mary Portas lead the Westfield "cultural team". A "24-hour lifestyle street" called the Arcade leads to the biggest casino in the land. This will be the only way into the 2012 Olympic Games for seven million people attending the athletics. The simple, grotesque message "buy me, buy me" will be London's welcome to the world.
Beacons for the indebted
“If you've seen the Disney film Wall-E," wrote Glancey in 2008, "you'll certainly recognise Westfield and malls like it. In the film, humans who long ago abandoned the Earth they messed up through greed live a supremely sedentary life shopping and eating. They are very tubby and have lost the use of their legs. Is this how we'll end up? Or will we plunge into the depths of some mammoth recession . . . with nothing and nowhere to spend?" In the less apocalyptic short term, Westfield is "a step towards our collective desire to undermine the life and culture of the traditional city, along with its architecture, and to shop and shop some more".
The original development plan for Stratford City evoked Barcelona: a grid of defined streets of shops and places to live. Modern, civilised. Then the Olympics loomed and so did Westfield, a major corporate sponsor. The mega mall, the biggest in urban Europe, has been built amid grey tower blocks not far from where last month's riots occurred; its "designer" products, made mostly with cheap, regimented labour, beckon the indebted and insult the past. That it stands on a site where London workers made trains - thousands of locomotives, carriages and goods wagons - in what was once called manufacturing is of melancholy interest only. The mega mall's jobs produce nothing and are mostly low-paid. It is an emblem of extreme times.
The co-founder of Westfield is Frank Lowy, an Australian-Israeli billionaire who is to shopping what Rupert Murdoch is to media. Westfield owns or has an interest in more than 120 malls worldwide. Lowy, a former Israeli commando, gives millions to Israel, and in 2003 set up the "independent" Lowy Institute for International Affairs which promotes Israel and US foreign policy.
On the day after the Stratford mall opened, Unicef reported that British parents "feel trapped in a materialistic culture" in which they bought off their children with "branded goods". Low-income parents felt "tremendous pressure from society" to buy trainers, "gadgets" and "branded clothes" for their children. TV advertising and other seductions of the "consumer culture", together with low pay and long working hours, were responsible. Children told the researchers that they preferred to spend time with their families and to have "plenty to do outdoors", but this was often no longer possible. As "welfare" has become a dirty word, basic facilities for the young such as youth clubs are being eliminated by local authorities. I predict more riots
Four years ago, Unicef published a league table of children's well-being across 20 industrialised nations. The UK was bottom. A fifth of British children live in poverty; the figure is forecast to rise in the Olympic year. The priority of Britain's political class, regardless of party, is repayment by ordinary people of "the deficit", a specious and cynical term for epic handouts to crooked banks, and the simultaneous waging of squalid colonial wars for the theft of other countries' resources. This is extremism that never speaks its name.
It is an extremism that has emasculated the social democracies that were Europe's redemption following the Second World War. The forced impoverishment of Greece with exorbitant returns demanded by German and French central bankers is likely to produce another fascist military coup. The forced impoverishment of millions of Britons by David Cameron's ancien régime, with its growing police state and compliant bourgeoisie, especially in the media, will produce more riots; nothing is surer.
One can count on the extremism of apartheid in any form to trigger such a result, no matter its consumerist gloss hermetically sealed in a mega mall. The prospect is democracy for the rich and totalitarianism not only for the poor; and "liberal intervention", as the Guardian calls it approvingly, for those useful foreign parts too weak to resist our "precision" Brimstone missiles.
I went to Parliament Square the other day. The graphic display of state crimes mounted by the peace and justice campaigner Brian Haw had been removed by the Metropolitan Police, knowing that finally he could no longer stand up to them, bodily and in the courts, as he did for a decade. Brian died in June. Visiting him one freezing Christmas, I was moved by the way he persuaded so many passers-by and the power of his courage. We now need millions like him. Urgently.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


109 comments
How lucky we are to have a John Pilger who cuts quickly to the quick. But what do you Brits do about it - FA. ?
Ed:
A BIT nutty? A BIT?
Gideon, I'd always thought you were a well-meaning, misguided obsessive. But if you can endorse that shit posted by stab in the back (I'm sure you're educated enough to get the historical reference in his/her moniker) then you're starting to sound like an anti-semite. And don't quote Moshe Menuhin again: you do it regularly, and I assume that you're thinking in terms of camouflage...if a jew says it, and I say it, then I can't be accused of being anti-semitic.
Let's see you start condemning human rights abuses in arab countries. Go on, you've plenty to go on. But from what I can see the only time you're visible on any of these threads is when you get an opportunity to put the boot into israel.
Pilger's obvious and numerous distortions, omissions and untruths do him a disservice. His motivations and objectives must be quite bizarre. Unfortunately he has not realised he would be greatly effective if objectivity, logic, reason and intelligence were his allies. Perhaps he's not as smart as he thinks he is. Or perhaps it is by design to get more attention and confrontation. Nonetheless a unique voice.
Big Mac's, KFC chicken wings and Coke Zero for everyone! Poverty, massacres, and an endless 'war on terror'.
Orwellian uniformity and a massive jackboot repeatedly stomping on heads. Welcome to the new World order! As John Lennon said years ago: "The people who run the world are completely insane and psychotic". Nothing has changed.
Wilip: 'Oh, and as a matter of basic economics, workers don't own or control their pension fund'
Wrong. Australian workers do own their pension funds. When they retire they receive money from those pension funds. The more money they have in their pension funds the more they can receive. So Westfield is owned by Australian workers. Obviously you don't know anything about Australian pension funds.
You should learn some basic economics and write about things you actually know about. And stop nitpicking about my odd typpppoooo .. you better make sure you never make an English mistake.
Why do Ed, John Woods, 'Mr Danger' and 'Mr Divine' resort so quickly to abusing those with whom they disagree?
Surely, if they were confident that the evidence really backed their views, they would let the evidence do the talking?
@johnwood
There is no need for comments like that you made about Prophet Muhammed. Please don't post comments like that this is a discussion for grown ups. Interesting what some people would say from the comfort of their own home, hiding behind closed doors. Btw I'm glad to see more liberal articles like this one, at least there are some out there who refuse to be moulded by fat cats like Murdoch who have been targeting simpletons like you for decades...your comment on Muhammed is prime example of this.
I wasn't putting my foot in it. Just because I do the typo doesn't mean my writing isn't clear. Clarity has nothing to do with making the odd spelling mistake. What matters is the style of your English and Gideon's style isn't very clear. Your style may be clear but it is lacking in knowledge. I was talking about who owns Westfield, and I have demonstrated it is primarily Australian workers through Australian pension funds. You don't know anything about Australian pension. Isn't that right? You lump all pension funds in the same wishy washy way you see the 'capitalist system'. Let me enlighten you so you don't make yourself look even more stupid in subsequent posts.
Many pension funds in Australia are self managed. That is, workers can set up their own pension funds, and invest in any way they choose. Even the pension funds that are managed by administrators provide a choice between options from cash to direct shares. So in effect the pension funds are managed by the choice of the workers. The industry pension funds are not 'companies', they are pension funds usually dealing with workers from a certain sector. They are highly regulated by government and the 'cut' that they get is minimal because of the regulations.
The Australian pension fund scheme (know as 'super') is regarded as the best in the world for workers. And like I said these pension funds are primarily the owners of Westfield.
Oh and I forgot to mention that the employer contributes to the worker's pension fund (about 9% of the wage). And yet the worker receives the money when he/she retires, and not the business! How's that for a cut! Like I said it is considered the best worker's pension fund scheme in the world.