Cuts burden: Women 73%|Men 27%
Commons research shows the Chancellor's changes to tax and pay will hit women almost three times as hard as men.
By Alice Gribbin Published 02 December 2011 10:24
New research by the independent House of Commons Library shows that the measures outlined in the Chancellor's Autumn Statement will be paid for almost three times more by women than by men. On Tuesday, George Osborne laid out plans to raise £2.37 billion though tax credit cuts and caps on public sector pay -- but new figures reveal that 73 per cent (£1.73 billion) of the money will come from women, and just 27 per cent (£638 million) from men.
The report, commissioned by the Labour party, reveals that the Chancellor's two-year 1 per cent cap on public sector pay rises will affect 4.6 million women and 2.6 million men, meanwhile changes to child tax credits will take £908m from women (89 per cent), whilst men will lose £112m.
On release of the findings, Labour leader Ed Miliband called this latest round of cuts by the Coalition government "the biggest attack on women in a generation."
Labour's Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: "The Government is clearly shockingly out of touch with women's lives," and noted that Tuesday's round of austerity measures announced by Osborne are not the first with a gender bias: "If you look at all the changes to direct tax, benefits, pay and pensions announced by the Chancellor since the General Election, of the £18.9 billion that the Government is raising each year, £13.2 billion is coming from women and £5.7 billion from men. Women are being hit twice as hard."
The NS has long noted the Coalition's problems with women: a recent leading article considered David Cameron's treatment of issues "from public-service reform to benefits to rape," and statistics in both the long- and short-term have shown support by women for the Conservative party to be in steep decline.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















5 comments
No they should be made until they dropped dead. only joking but that seems to be the future.
Well, that's all right then.
Personally I would like focus to be greater on lower middle income groups, the most efficient way to help them is to increase the tax free threshold, all other ways have administrative costs.
If we focus on women I think entrepreneurship is another great area to focus, already girls do better than boys at exams but entrepreneurs are the next holy grail and helping women and entrepreneurs is a neglected area the future of the economy is mumprenuers and female entrepreneurs.
NO woman should be forced to work till 68.
And no man should be forced to work till 65.
Its an absolute disgrace. Altough we are living longer doesn't necessarily mean we have the physical capacity to work.
Nothing new here, been written about forever. Still no mention of the women who are entitled to no benefits in their own right if they have a partner that is working. Makes the unemployment statistics a bit nicer though - almost as if we don't count.
Post new comment