Deride Miliband for anything you like, but not his looks
The shabby treatment of the Labour leader opens the door to more of this kind of unedifying garbage in the future.
By Steve Baxter Published 16 January 2012 16:33
Is Ed Miliband too ugly to be prime minister? Or leader of the opposition? It's a question that has been captivating entirely no-one since John Humphrys, clearly the world's most handsome and desirable man, suggested the younger Miliband was as rough as a robber's dog. And yet, it pops up again. The Sunday Times commissioned a poll to ask the Great British Public what they thought.
Astoundingly, the majority did not reply with "I don't care either way - why are you asking me this? Is this really all you've got, at a time when our economies are circling the drain? Pointless tittle-tattle about the attractiveness or otherwise of leaders of the opposition? I remember when the Sunday Times stood for something, some stray fragment of journalistic integrity, a concept that long seems to have passed you by." Or at least, if they did, their barbed retorts have not been recorded by the psephologists in great detail on this occasion.
Is this what it's come to? Can we only judge our politicians based on whether they are as startlingly delicious as John Humphrys - unarguably the world's most gorgeously enticing man - or fall short of his high standards? Well, apparently it has. Forget Ed Miliband's policies; forget his presentation; forget anything he might say, or do. Is he pretty enough to be PM?
My reaction to this is the kind of thing that makes political correspondents, were they ever to chance upon this page while chortling away about a terrifically clever pun one of their sources told them over an enormous subsidised lunch, shake their heads. Oh but this is the cut and thrust, they would say, were they ever accidentally to happen upon these words. This is all part of the knockabout fun that is the world of politics.
I'm all for making fun of people, whether it's deserved or not. Some of the world's most brilliant and successful political leaders have been disgustingly, repulsively unattractive. You'd hardly want a kiss on the lips from FDR, or Churchill's baby-like face looming over and gurning at you during a moment of passion. Must we want to have sex with people, or consider them attractive, in order to believe in what they say?
Of course, it could get even worse in the near future. Imagine what could happen if Labour's Yvette Cooper, or any other bright and intelligent female politician, managed to become leader of their party. What then? It could all become a pungent mess of whether we could consider them as PILFs - politicians we'd like to fuck - rather than people with progressive policies.
In one sense, then, the shabby treatment of Ed Miliband over this pointless piffling issue opens up the door to more of this kind of unedifying garbage in the future. You can see with the fuss made over Louise Mensch's looks that this kind of thing is just waiting to be unleashed - and it will probably be a lot worse for whichever unlucky female takes over at the top of a political party in the future than it is now for Ed.
Not that that's any consolation. Deride Ed for anything you like - his use of the word 'atmos', for example, which made me cry blood into a bucket last week - but not for how pretty he is naturally. Despite all the attempts to make it so, this isn't a bloody playground. Not yet. Even the stunningly beautiful John Humphrys cannot convince me of that.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















23 comments
Not wanting to join in with the superficial judgements but.....John Humphrys, unlike his counterpart female newscasters, has become a shriveled and unattractive old fool.
I thought that the New Statesman had no problem with taking the piss out of the way our politicians look. See here. http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2011/01/eric-pickles-gian...
"It must be so demeaning to be judged by one's looks & ignored in every other respect," thought every woman in the history of the universe.
The sad truth is that Milibands unfortunate policies are badly expressed by a man who looks a geek.His insincerity and wooly words float into the ether and one concentrates on his rubber features.
Isn't it time someone gave that pompous smart ass Humphreys less respect and more of the hard time he deserves. Humphreys has spent too long making a living out of what he imagines himself to be. This self appointed tribune of the people, oozing smug self importance, is a has been with very little going for him. He needs cutting down to size and that should not be difficult. Ed Miliband could do it.
In the US I heard a rude adage, apparently from Hollywood: "Politics is showbiz for ugly people".
@John, London. Rather TB's 'rictus' and full employment and feeling proud of my country than fat David's shiny pillow face and all our rights disappearing down the swanny. Just saying.
I switched from the Sunday Times a long time ago - not because of its conservative editorial line but because it has become the most bloated tabloid on the newsstand. And I agree politicians shouldn't be judged on looks and Humphreys interviewing was crass and cack handed.
That said, I don't think Humphreys was trying to say Miliband is too ugly to be Prime Minister. The point (I think) he was trying to make was that some politicians have negatives that are hard to overcome - and he used Robin Cook as an example. And I think that point, although badly made in Humphreys case, is a good one. Morever, it applies to Miliband. His looks aren't the main problem - he's not a bad looking guy - but he doesn't have the X factor (Jonathan Freedland's words in response to his party speech) and if you're failing in other areas (policy and strategy) that negative can prove toxic.
Several of the Republican presidential hopefuls look as if they've come straight out of Hollywood's Central Casting.
A handsome maturity and a full-head of hair makes one presidential material these days.
Newt among the grey-hairs running for the Republican ticket, and with no leading-man profile to boot, may however still sink his glossier rivals.
And yet no Jewish-American, Republican or Democrat, is running.
Of course, Barry Goldwater had his shott but at the time the electorate thought he was a mite quick on the trigger. Shades of 'HIgh Noon' when the townspeople for no good reason couldn't back the sheriff.
For some time our group deplored the fact that no British Jew had attained the office of prime minister;
then it dawned on us that D'Israeli had led the Conservative Party into government.
Yes, the Conservatives had the first Jewish PM and not so long ago the first woman PM.
Surely there can't be a hint of anti-Semitism in the attacks on Ed Milliband. The Tories have a reasonable number of British Jewry on the coalition back benches, and besides those aides protecting the London mayor, they have many local councillos in Westminster and on other Greater London councils.
No, it seems anti-Semitism is not the elephant in the room. Still, it is getting a little personal; references to physical appearance and vocalisation.
And when there was a rumpus about politicians and police and journalists being a little too cosy nary a word about Free Masonry, the Knights of St Columbanus, Rotarians and Opus Dei to name but a few ,
After all Dizzy was Queen Victroria's fave PM.
Boy Scout
This might have been written by a feminist talking about how things should be in their idealistic world while ignoring actual reality. The bottom line is this, like it or not some, possibly many people will not vote for Ed Miliband because he looks geeky. A nerd if you will. Combine that with the fact everyone knows he has never has a proper job and it will turn off voters. Sorry, but that is important and worth mentioning reagrdless of whether we all prefer it were not.Appearance is important in politics whether you like it or not.
So we should judge them on what, exactly?...what they say?
...or do wait until later and judge them not on what they say, but what they tell us they actually meant when they said it?
See I'd like to judge them on whether they're in thrall to the free market...but then I'd have nobody to vote for, except my local Socialist Labour candidate-which I did- who lost his deposit again. Mind you, he is one ugly fucker.
Politics...it's a friggin minefield.
Agreed.
But is it OK to deride Ed of wasting two years in opposition against Cameron?
Or of having absolutely nothing in terms of policy or of any coherent line of attacking the Tories.
Or of having no presence, personality or debating skill when facing Cameron at PMQ's despite having open goal after open goal to score.
Or of having no charisma or gravitas
and might as well be invisible as far as the voters go.
He may well be a 'good man',likeable and highly intelligent but he is no budding PM. The sooner Labour MP's realise the almighty balls up they made in electing as leader the better because the next G E may be three years away but it is already lost.
They should either replace him now with his brother or leave it until the last minute before the next election when it would give the party a massive lift,but that would be a tremendous gamble.Best to do it now boys and girls.
I'm absurdly attractive. All it does is remind me daily of how luck forms us. I didn't do nothing for my looks, nor did Camenron for his upbringing, or Milibland for his brain. So I guess being good looking might not be a bad thing.
Humphries is a dick.
no judging on looks then,though it does depend what you mean by looks, someone can be very attractive, but look at me in a menacing way, if i judge them on that nasty look, what does that count as?
but anyway, what i am worrying about regarding miliband's leadership of the labour party is that he is at risk of moving it to the right of cameron, and i am going to have to vote conservative, to keep out a party of populist right wing bastards.
''is Ed Miliband too ugly to be prime minister? Or leader of the opposition?''
He's not ugly. He just happens to have an attractive brother.
'He will be the next PM of this country whether you like it or not'
Actually I think it depends on votes, so as a voter it does depend on me, whether you like it or not.
P.S/ It not that he's ugly, its that he looks like Wallace without Gromit, excpet with Nick Park to add the animation he is as lifeless incapable of any sense of urgency as a piece of plasticine.
Post new comment