Women's sport sold down the river only a month after Olympic high
What should be a blockbusting qualifying fixture for England's women footballers will be played at a time and place that guarantee it will be ignored.
By Naomi Westland Published 19 September 2012 12:47
The London Olympics catapulted women’s football into the spotlight. More than 70,000 fans watched the GB women’s team beat Brazil 1-0 at Wembley, eclipsing a 92-year old attendance record for a women’s game in the UK.
This huge turnout suggested the British public had finally cottoned on to the fact that women can play football and that it's worth watching. It was impossible for the media to ignore, even with plenty of competition from other Olympic events. Many hailed the Games as a new dawn for women's football.
But now, just over a month since the end of the Olympics, that dream appears to be over.
Today, the England women’s football team plays its final qualifying game on the road to the 2013 European championships. If this was the men’s team, it would be a blockbusting fixture at prime time on the hallowed turf at Wembley.
But this is the women’s team we’re talking about. The match takes place at the 11,000-seater Banks stadium, home to League One Walsall. And guess what? Kick off’s at 5pm, when everyone is still at work. Even if you live in Walsall, chances are you won’t be able to make it.
The game will be shown live on BBC2, which is progress. But according to research by the Women’s Sport and Fitness Foundation women's sport receives less than five per cent of sports media coverage, despite the fact that other research they’ve done shows 61 per cent of fans want to see more women’s sport in the media.
When I complained during the Olympics about the lack of coverage of women’s sport outside of the Games, and said there was never anything in the press to tell me when England’s women’s matches were on, people dismissed my comments and said that with the internet there’s no excuse for not being able to find out. They also said if no one makes the effort to go to women’s games the media won’t cover them.
So I promised myself that when the Games were over I’d look up the first England women’s match and go to it with my daughter. When I found out where and when it was I had to laugh. If I hadn’t, I’d have cried.
Football matches at impossible times mean fewer people will be able to go. When no one turns up, the male-dominated sports desks of our national newspapers will say: “Look, no one’s interested, why should we write about that?”
Media coverage equals role models, and this is particularly important as when they leave school girls are only half as likely to play sport as boys.
A keen footballer as a child and teenager, I understand the sexism girls and women come up against. I played in my primary school 11-a-side team and the girls’ 5-a-side team. The girls’ team made something of a local name for itself thanks to an inspirational and forward thinking teacher (Mr Matthews, if you’re reading this, thank you) who made it his mission to turn us into footballers. We dominated the local primary school league for years, winning the Trevor Brooking Cup on many occasions. I still have a photo of me shaking hands with the former England player as he presented me, as team captain that year, with the shield.
But all that changed when I started secondary school. None of the local schools had girls’ football teams. For a couple of seasons I played for a team on a local estate but the encouragement and the role models just weren’t there. Add the influence of society’s expectations of what teenage girls should be and do, and eventually I gave it up.
The lack of encouragement I faced as a young teenager in the late 80s should be a thing of the past. It’s not just about the media. Sports bodies need to do much more to promote women’s sport and more investment is essential to convince girls that sport is as much for them as it is for their male peers.
But the media can take a lead and stand up for women’s sport and sports fans. It can push UEFA to take a more ambitious approach to timetabling women’s games so more people can go and watch. It’s not too late to harness the enthusiasm and excitement of the Olympics and Paralympics. I really hope the Walsall fixture is a hangover from a bygone age, something already set up that they couldn’t rearrange, but I’m not convinced. Unless we start to see women’s football at high-profile venues around the country and prime time kick offs soon, an opportunity will have been lost and another generation let down.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists





















14 comments
This is nonsense.
How many people go and watch female club football? At the top level, the equivalent of the male premiership, it's a few hundred per match.
Not because the grounds are full, not because the matches are held during working hours, that's how many people want to watch them.
If you add up all of the weekly attendances at the top level woman's matches it's less than a the crowd at a single non-league male club.
My husband and I went to the match and it was excellent. We both commented about the time, 5pm most people are at work, we're retired. We were watching Croatia warm up and their goalkeeper was saving every goal that the male coach was hammering at her, this shows how well England played to get past her. Croatia were pinned down by England and rarely had a chance to score.
The trainer wasn't trying to score, during the goal keepers warm up you don't want to smash winners past them, it's supposed to help them get their eye in and keep their confidence high.
I feel genuinely angry at this, but not half as angry at the fact that the author of the article has seamlessly segued from Team GB to Team England.
Scotland ladies were playing tonight too. Did you even notice Naomi? Your despair at the sidelining of woman's football is eclipsed by your clumsiness in terms of the nation's real-politic. You could care less.
If you listen carefully you can hear the sound of the SNP embracing new voters.
Lovely.
I agree, I would have watched it if I was home in time. I checked the Guardian website under the section titled 'Football' but ... nothing. But I suppose promoting woman's sport is hardly a priority for a paper that regularly promotes the Islamist cause.
How can turn a sexism issue into.a race issue...what a racist fool you are...
Evidence for racism please? My point was in a supposed liberal newspaper - one positively steeped in identity politics - it can find no place to promote the national game for woman. Yet Islamism - something you would think is diametrically opposed to feminism - is regularly promoted.
I seldom watch football on the telly, my own team Liverpool are a continual disappointment to me and I would never watch that bunch of overpaid twats that play for England men's team. Having said that I wouldn't mind watching the ladies giving it some welly.
If you honestly believe the poor standard of women's football is on a par with the traditions of the men's game, then you really are living in la-la land.
No one cares about women's football in any great numbers to warrant a massive stadium and its costs for a few thousand fans, let alone media coverage to match the premier league, which is the biggest and best sports league n the world.
Media coverage is based on commercial viability. Newspapers have to sell advertising and copies to survive - its not a charity. Will thousands more buy the paper if there is a page on women's football? A very simple answer there: NO.
Your argument appears to be that the public profile of sports / sports teams is fixed and cannot ever be altered.
After all, without media interest and promotion, sports such as women's football are unlikely to attract large crowds, which in turn means they'll be unlikely to attract sponsors, which in turn means they'll be unlikely to afford the best coaches to ensure the players are brought up to elite standards, which in turn means they won't be able to attract the attention of large broadcasters or prime-time slots.
However, even without media interest and promotion, it could be possible for the larger clubs at least to improve the game of their women's teams. Maybe try (on an experimental one-off basis at first) arranging a joint training session between the male and female teams (if held at the stadium, the women could potentially use the away team's facilities), or maybe even a friendly (perhaps for charity?) between the two teams. Even if they're not evenly matched, it's likely to be beneficial to both teams - the men should be professional enough not to treat the women with proverbial kid gloves or try anything inappropriate...
Wow, I bet you feel much better for having said that.
The England men's qualifier against Ukraine at Wembley wasn't exactly a sell-out. Maybe we're all suffering from sports ticket fatigue?
Why can't there be women's football played in Walsall?
Oh, you expect things to have seriously changed because of the Olympics? Dream on.