Welfare
The 10 per cent cut to Council Tax Benefit will force many to pay the tax for the first time. It could prove the most disastrous of the coalition's welfare reforms.
The way in which the entire debate on benefits seems to be taking place entirely outside the realms of logic seems unprecedented, says Alex Andreou.
Four Lib Dems, including Sarah Teather and Julian Huppert, voted against the bill and two abstained.
"It is intolerable then to blame the unemployed for their poverty and our deficit."
The government's Impact Assessment shows that the poorest 10 per cent of households lose the most from the decision to raise benefits by just 1 per cent.
Raising benefits by less than the rate of inflation is a poverty-producing policy.
Osborne's plan to cut benefits will force more of the poorest families to choose between heating and eating.
Rather than arguing about policy and practice, both parties encourage a futile debate about motivation and motive.
Labour's 'tough' message risks encouraging the belief that benefit claimants seek to avoid work.
The better educated people are about the benefits system, the less likely they are to support the coalition's reforms.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists
