50 People Who Matter 2010 | 1. Rupert Murdoch
Sky Lord.
By Peter Wilby Published 21 September 2010
The rise of Margaret Thatcher, the rise and fall of New Labour, public hostility to the EU: the Murdoch empire has long played a major role in British politics.
Now the Murdoch influence is evident in the US, too. Rupert Murdoch's Fox News has become the leading cable news channel, its viewing figures exceeding those of its rivals CNN and MSNBC combined. According to one poll, the notoriously right-wing Fox is America's most trusted TV news outlet. Two-thirds of Tea Party supporters get their current affairs from Fox.
The controversy over plans to build a mosque (which isn't actually a mosque) close to "Ground Zero" was almost entirely created by Fox and Murdoch's US paper, the New York Post. Murdoch dithered over the 2008 presidential election, eventually backing John McCain. Now, more decisively, he has donated $1m to the Republican Governors Association. If right-wing Republicans do well in the midterm elections - and overthrow President Obama in 2012 - they will owe much to Fox News and Murdoch.
Could the Murdoch-owned Sky News become the British Fox, escaping regulations that require balance? BSkyB, the parent company, is now second only to the BBC - which ministers seem determined to downsize - in the British TV industry. It reaches more than ten million homes, makes profits of £500m a year and spends more on marketing than ITV does on programming.
James Murdoch, head of News Corporation Europe and Asia, has assured ministers that he and his father will not alter Sky News content. But the Murdochs' efforts to buy the 61 per cent of BSkyB they don't already own could allow them to redirect the channel. They could also combine satellite, newspaper and website subscriptions, making sense of their decision to put the online Times and Sunday Times behind a paywall. Newspapers might not directly influence votes, but they still make the political weather. David Cameron is unlikely to stand in their way.
Despite the sale of three Chinese TV channels, the Murdochs continue to spread their influence. Star India grows aggressively. News Corp has taken a stake in Rotana, one of the Arab world's biggest media companies. And the greatest prize of all remains within Murdoch's reach - toppling the New York Times as the leading US paper with the acquisition of the Wall Street Journal. Just possibly, the cash-strapped NY Times itself could fall into his hands.
Yet Murdoch may come to regret making such a powerful enemy. With the assistance of the NY Times, the claim that illegal phone-hacking was endemic at the Murdoch-owned News of the World refuses to go away. So far, the allegations have failed to implicate the former NoW editor Andy Coulson. But could they go higher, Watergate-style? At the very least, if the hundreds of alleged victims sue for breach of privacy, it could cost the company millions.
Next: 2. Barack Obama
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


21 comments
Hear hearmitchy and Matt
Faustino,
I live in Australia but am not Australian and I can tell you that these days The Australian is a rabid piece of right wing climate denier cods wallop.
Once upon a time, about 15 to 20 years ago, The OO was a good read and came at things from a strongly pro-republican (as in not monarchist) point of view.
Now it is just neo-con Murdochian fish and chip wrapping that tries to be a semi serious version of ‘Faux News’ or The New York Post.
Its target market is angry old white men. Most of whom are so angry and so foscilised that it is about time they went ‘to push up the daisies’ and become ‘ex-readers’.
the Fairfax papers such as The Age or The Sydney Morning Herald are far better reads and far less polemical in their politics.
@faustino: you're dazzled by the Murdoch press' quality?
Gee, then I guess your other source of news must be the Hicksville Bugle.
Let me explain something to you, one aussie to another: Murdoch deserves his #1 ranking, by virtue of the shear size and scope of the evil empire he has built: a destroyer of democracy, decency and truth; friend to tyrants and criminals; cheer-leader of illegal wars; tax avoider on an epic scale; becoming a US citizen for said avoidance.
I rank him alongside Hitler - Goebbels was benign in comparison. I you think otherwise you have been beguiled - by Murdoch perhaps, or drugs.
Finally, as one who's lived in Oz since 1970, let me remind you that Murdoch press propaganda helped in the demise of the Whitlam govt in 1975, which was in effect a CIA orchestrated coup d'etat, and that makes Murdoch a traitor.
As for previous commentator named "smarterthanDomino", I suggest you be known as "dumberthanShit".
It is a myth that Fox News is notoriously right wing. More Democrats watch Fox News than the entire viewership of CNN and MSNBC combined, and that is a fact.
crazy right wingers i guess are the working class tories who are completely brainwashed by the right wing media elite, the rich (tories) using in psychoanalysis reporters,
in the medis , example spin doctor for labour, for tories it pr man public relations,
labour will allways bow to media pressure , the rich & elite are to power full for labour ,
Murdoch's The Australian is far and away the best newspaper in Australia, and it airs a wide range of opinions. Sky News, partly-owned by Murdoch, is also better than all other tv news suppliers in Oz. Here at least, he is the main backer of a free and intelligent press, on which informed democracy depends.
@ Faustino
Well, you're talking about Australia - even the Sun would be quality, intelligent press there, just as Hitler would be considered left of centre.
Try again. Fail again. Fail better!
If present political trends in USA continue Murdoch's effective, continuous and thorough promoting of the 'conservative' base here may eventually pull down the temple. Why? Fascistic forces in USA are now building rapidly because Fox News feeds the paranoia and feeds ignorance.
Murdoch owns about 30% of News Corp so it's not some crazy dude taking over the world.
The socialist left only make a big deal out of Murdoch because they want to control all media. The NS is just as bad at propaganda as News Corp. Look at how it ignores any positive economic data so as not to give any legitimacy to the coalition, and look at how it constantly painted David Miliband in a bad light, and covered Ed Miliband much more than any of the other leadership candidates.
I, for one, welcome our new, petty, wrinkly-faced sniveling rat-faced git overlords.
Post new comment