Getty
Show Hide image

Rise of the nationalists: a guide to Europe’s far-right parties

Ten political parties leading the far-right surge on the continent.

We are seeing a rise of far-right parties in mainstream European politics. Playing on scepticism about the European Union following the eurozone’s travails, and using racist rhetoric to exploit a migration crisis that has become difficult to contain, these parties are gaining voters in countries across the continent. Here is a guide to the top ten insurgent far-right groups – some new, some established – achieving the most electoral success in Europe:

Alternative für Deutschland

Germany’s AfD has gained representation in ten of the 16 German state parliaments since September 2016. Last year, anti-Islam policies replaced its Eurosceptic focus, the slogan “Islam is not a part of Germany” emerging from the party’s spring conference. Support has slipped in recent months: AfD is polling at 8 per cent and its leaders, Frauke Petry and Jörg Meuthen, are under pressure after a senior AfD politician made a speech urging Germany to stop atoning for Nazi crimes.


All photos: Getty

Jobbik

The nationalist “Movement for a Better Hungary” held its position as the country’s third-largest party in the 2014 parliamentary elections and won a crucial by-election against the right-wing ruling party, Fidesz, a year later. Jobbik’s leader, Gábor Vona, 38, is trying to improve its image by repackaging it as a “people’s party”. It is still hindered by a reputation for anti-Semitism, which rests on its preoccupation with Hungarian ethnicity and hostility towards Israel.

Front National

The French party is enjoying a renaissance after a successful move to “detoxify” the brand under Marine Le Pen, the daughter of its first leader, Jean-Marie Le Pen. Polling at 26 per cent, Marine is expected to win the first round of voting for the presidential election on 23 April. Anti-immigration rhetoric brought the FN huge gains in the 2015 local elections – it came first in six of France’s 13 regions, beating the two main parties.

Golden Dawn

These Greek neo-fascists use Nazi-style symbolism and have expressed admiration for Hitler’s regime. Their leader, Nikolaos Michaloliakos – who in 2012 called the gas chambers “a lie” – rejects the label “neo-Nazi”, preferring “Greek nationalist”. Exploiting the fallout of austerity and the migration crisis, Golden Dawn came third in Greece’s September 2015 election, winning 7 per cent of the vote. At that time, its spokesman Ilias Kasidiaris, who boasts a swastika tattoo, declared: “Golden Dawn is a movement of power; it is not a protest movement any more.”

Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs

Licking its wounds after narrowly losing Austria’s rerun presidential election to the Greens’ Alexander van der Bellen in December, the FPÖ is trying to secure its clout. Its leader, Heinz-Christian Strache, travelled to Trump Tower to congratulate the new US president in January and had a meeting with Donald Trump’s then national security adviser, Mike Flynn. Accused of Nazi sympathies, the FPÖ is vocally anti-Islam. It holds 38 of the 183 seats on Austria’s National Council.

The Finns

The nationalist True Finns emerged from near-obscurity to become the third-largest party in Finland in 2011. “Revolution!” the press declared, as they won 39 of the 200 seats in parliament, adding 34 to their 2007 tally. But failing to work in coalition with governing parties condemned them to obscurity. Now known as The Finns, they returned strongly, becoming the second-largest party in parliament in 2015 and joining the current coalition. Led by Timo Soini, The Finns are Eurosceptic and anti-globalist.

Sweden Democrats

Having emerged from the white suprematist movement, the Sweden Democrats are the third-largest party in the Swedish Riksdag, with 49 seats and 12.9 per cent of the national vote. They work alone as an opposition party, because mainstream political groups refuse to co-operate with them. Their quiet and bespectacled leader, Jimmie Åkesson, 37, uses anti-immigrant rhetoric and has expressed admiration for Donald Trump. His party is polling second to the governing Social Democrats, at 21.5 per cent – on a par with the centre-right Moderate Party.

Danish People’s Party

The nativist Danish People’s Party became the second-largest party in Denmark in the 2015 general election, winning 21 per cent of the vote, up from 12 per cent in 2011. Rather than stay in opposition, it provides parliamentary support to the plurality of leading centre-right parties. Slick and soft-spoken, the DPP’s leader, Kristian Thulesen Dahl, has called for cuts to immigration from Muslim countries and withdrawal from the EU’s Schengen free-movement area. Its economic policies lean more to the left: it supports a strong welfare state.

Partij voor de Vrijheid

The Dutch nationalist, anti-Islam PVV experienced a rapid rise to power in 2006 when, as a relatively new movement, it gained a greater share of seats in the House of Representatives than other, more established parties. In 2012 it came third; at present, it has 12 MPs. Its leader and sole member is Geert Wilders, whose appetite for controversy and unconventional one-man route to popularity (see feature) prompted the Politico website to label him “the man who invented Trumpism”. Opinion polls put the PVV in the lead for the 15 March general election, narrowly in front of Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s Volkspartij voor Vrijheid en Democratie.

Lega Nord

Italy’s neo-fascists have enjoyed a bounce after slumping to a historic low of 4 per cent in the 2013 election for the lower house. But the party that used be a partner in Silvio Berlusconi’s coalition, winning 10.2 per cent of the vote in the 2009 European parliamentary elections, has been given new life by Matteo Salvini, 43, who became its leader in 2013. It has also proved adept at exploiting the migrant crisis, which has hit Italy hard, and it has been polling fourth among Italian parties (about 13 per cent) for much of this year.

Anoosh Chakelian is senior writer at the New Statesman.

This article first appeared in the 02 March 2017 issue of the New Statesman, The far right rises again

Photo: Getty
Show Hide image

The Trump-Bannon feud just feeds our need to put a narrative to the White House circus

We should stop allowing these men whose only agenda is a desperate need for relevance, to keep hijacking the media cycle.

Does anyone leave the White House with any dignity? In this series, Sean Spicer flounced out, stung by Scaramucci's hiring, and allegedly stole a mini-fridge while he was at it. The Mooch soon after famously lasted less in his position than any perishables in that mini-fridge. Omarosa was dragged out by security after using the White House as a pre-wedding venue, and now Steve Bannon, who miraculously didn't leave under any discernible cloud, is now in a full on food fight with Donald Trump. The White House is like a full digestive system, things go in fresh and clean, then are processed through its organs and are ejected, foul and rancid.

In the latest Trump administration bowel movement, a new “explosive” book by Michael Wolff, Fire and Fury (in a title that manages to outnaff Dan Brown - everything related to the Trump administration is out of really bad Tom Clancy fanfic), Steve Bannon burns any last vestiges of loyalty and among other salvos, calls the meeting between the president's son and Russian officials during the 2016 election campaign “unpatriotic” and “treasonous”. Trump responded by saying that Bannon had “lost his mind” and was struggling to win in the real world, where he was not hitched to Trump’s winning machine. Reading the details in the excerpt obtained by the Guardian, written in Wolff’s characteristicly breathless thriller style, feels like binge eating on something that’s bad for you but gives you a bit of a high, followed by a wave of emptiness and self loathing. A specific passage, about Ivanka making fun of her father’s hair, was delight followed by despair. Haha, even his daughter thinks he's ridiculous, the president of the United States is a vain buffoon held in contempt even by his own family. Haha. Oh God. 

Nothing anyone can say about Trump is surprising anymore, so why are we doing this. At this point it’s a fake highbrow reality show. Just because it’s the office of the president doesn’t make it less voyeuristic and petty than the Kardashian household. Which is why Wolff is an apt author for what is probably scripted reality. Apart from Bannon’s quotes, which are in themselves a subjective view of a political bottom feeder who has read his own press clippings, I would take the whole thing with a pinch of salt.

But we won’t, because no one can lay a glove on Trump and he is still in the White House a year later with the Mueller investigation frustrating us with its tiresome due process and so we are desperate for a hit. Narratives are created because people want to believe them. Remember Steve Bannon as Darth Vader? Remember how the media so badly wanted to believe that there was some genius behind the throne? Remember the long profiles with the moody photos of him as the dark Archangel, summoning grass roots anger and orchestrating it into a victory for Donald Trump? Remember the man who was not a racist, but a maverick, an ideologue? That man is the same one whose messages to Milo Yiannopoulos revealed a basic lack of literacy and a short temper. Behold the wise master engineer of the alt-right in correspondence:

“Your [sic] full of shit. When I need your advice on anything I will ask. ... The tech site is a total clusterfuck---meaningless stories written by juveniles. You don’t have a clue how to build a company or what real content is. And you don’t have long to figure it out or your [sic] gone. … You are magenalia [sic].”

In the latest interview with Wolff for his book, Bannon says that they are “…going to crack Don Junior like an egg on national TV”. That the meeting with the Russians was “bad shit”. Thanks for that Steve, your stints in the Ivy League and the upper echelons of investment banking which every media profile made sure to mention as prima facie evidence of your competence and genius have not let you down. 

Even Trump, to this day, after everything, is still constantly cast as this or that. Someone who has made the White House “accessible“ when his predecessors were “aloof“, someone with a “social media strategy“. One of the most challenging postures for the human mind to become accustomed to, is that of incoherence and randomness. We didn’t need Bannon to go through his White House de-fanging, or to lose his Alabama punt on Roy Moore to realise that he maybe isn’t all that hot. Perhaps the fact that he was a comically grandiose Breitbart editor with bad spelling, willing to piggyback off the alt-right to promote his ego, should have given that away.

But no one comes out of this looking good. We're clamouring for a book by Michael Wolff which is clearly a vehicle for a new Bannon “keeper of the flame“ psychodrama episode, to tell us something that we already know - the White House is a circus. The only thing we can take away from the whole affair is to be more skeptical of narratives and go by what our senses and prodigious evidence tells us. No one know what they are doing, there was no plan, and we should stop allowing these men whose only agenda is a desperate need for relevance, to keep hijacking the media cycle and imposing their own self-serving narratives.